Differences between revisions 12 and 17 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 12 as of 2013-06-13 15:16:28
Size: 1565
Comment:
Revision 17 as of 2013-06-13 15:30:15
Size: 1531
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ----
Line 12: Line 10:
We present a comparaison between the results obtained for run5 and run6. This is a comparison of the opacities derived with skydip technique between the run5 and run6.
In Fig-1 we present the NIKA band-pass for the two NIKA channels together with the ATM model calculated for different water vapor contents. Note that the band-pass are different between run5 and run6, so we expect to have a different ratio between the opacities at 1mm and 2mm.
In fig-2 we present the comparison between the opacities derived for 1mm and 2mm (blue point) channels and the ATM model (purple line). The left plots present the results for the run 5 and the right plots for run6. Note that for the run6 we have juste one point corresponding to the opacities derived from the skydip performed on June 11th 2013 scan number 159.
Line 14: Line 14:
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- The agreement between the measure points and the ATM is good for both run5 and run6.
Line 17: Line 17:
== Description ==

We present a comparaison between the results obtained for run5 and run6.

---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ----




---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ----
{{attachment:atm_run5.jpg||width=400}}
{{attachment:atm_run6.jpg||width=400}}
''Figure-1: NIKA band-pass for 1mm and 2mm channels for run5 (left) and for run6 (right)''


{{attachment:skyd_run5.jpg||width=400}}
{{attachment:skyd_run6.jpg||width=400}}

''Figure-2: Comparison between the opacities Measured with the skydip technique the ones derived with the ATM model. left plot run5 right plot run6.''

---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ----
Line 49: Line 28:
---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ----
== Conclusion ==

Back to the NIKA run 6

Skydips Method: Comparison Run5-Run6 results with ATM Model

Description

This is a comparison of the opacities derived with skydip technique between the run5 and run6. In Fig-1 we present the NIKA band-pass for the two NIKA channels together with the ATM model calculated for different water vapor contents. Note that the band-pass are different between run5 and run6, so we expect to have a different ratio between the opacities at 1mm and 2mm. In fig-2 we present the comparison between the opacities derived for 1mm and 2mm (blue point) channels and the ATM model (purple line). The left plots present the results for the run 5 and the right plots for run6. Note that for the run6 we have juste one point corresponding to the opacities derived from the skydip performed on June 11th 2013 scan number 159.

The agreement between the measure points and the ATM is good for both run5 and run6.

atm_run5.jpg atm_run6.jpg

Figure-1: NIKA band-pass for 1mm and 2mm channels for run5 (left) and for run6 (right). The purple curves correspond to the ATM model calculated for different water vapor contents.

skyd_run5.jpg skyd_run6.jpg

Figure-2: Comparison between the opacities Measured with the skydip (blue points) technique the ones derived with the ATM model (purple lines). left plot run5 right plot run6.

Conclusion

Skydip_comp (last edited 2013-06-16 07:33:51 by NikaBolometer)