Size: 1496
Comment:
|
Size: 2121
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 12: | Line 12: |
== Preliminary findings == * The main beam (the Gaussian part) seems with a normal width aka 11", 17". * The quadrupod holding the secondary gives clear diffraction marks as a faint cross visible in all scans. * In between, there is a large near-side lobe, especially at 2mm (but also visible at 1mm), that shows up as a rectangular pyramid-like shape at the 10% level, the origin of which is unknown. It seems to scale with wavelength. It was not so apparent in NIKA. Therefore the quality of the dichroic is not at the center of this issue. * For comparison, see the NIKA-1 beam maps in Fig.8 of [[http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2014/09/aa23557-14.pdf|Catalano+2014]] and in Fig.8 of [[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/24/pdf|Monfardini+2011]]. |
|
Line 14: | Line 24: |
{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73_foot.jpg||width=500}} | * 20151030s73 {{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73.jpg||width=800}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73_foot.jpg||width=800}} {{attachment:beam20151030s73.png||height=450}} * 20151031s88 |
Line 16: | Line 32: |
{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88_foot.jpg||width=500}} | {{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:beam20151031s88.png||height=450}} |
Line 19: | Line 37: |
{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174_foot.jpg||width=500}} |
* 20151029s217 {{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:beam20151029s217.png||height=450}} * 20151030s174 {{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:beam20151030s174.png||height=450}} |
Line 23: | Line 51: |
{{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51_foot.jpg||width=500}} | |
Line 25: | Line 52: |
== Preliminary findings == The main beam (the Gaussian part) seems with a normal width aka 11", 17". |
* 20151030s51 |
Line 28: | Line 54: |
The quadripod holding the secondary gives clear diffraction marks as a faint cross visible in all scans. | {{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51_foot.jpg||width=500}} |
Line 30: | Line 56: |
In between, there is a large near-side lobe, especially at 2mm (but also visible at 1mm), that shows up as a rectangular pyramid-like shape at the 10% level, the origin of which is unknown. It seems to scale with wavelength. It was not so apparent in NIKA. Therefore the quality of the dichroic is not at the center of this issue. | {{attachment:beam20151030s51.png||height=450}} |
Describe OffProcNika2Run1Beam here.
Discussion on beams
Page last updated, FXD, CK, 2015-11-02 Figures to be redone
We measure the beam by using the middle scan of the 3-scans sequence launched with @beammap Here are the best-of on 3 sources.
Preliminary findings
- The main beam (the Gaussian part) seems with a normal width aka 11", 17".
- The quadrupod holding the secondary gives clear diffraction marks as a faint cross visible in all scans.
- In between, there is a large near-side lobe, especially at 2mm (but also visible at 1mm), that shows up as a rectangular pyramid-like shape at the 10% level, the origin of which is unknown. It seems to scale with wavelength. It was not so apparent in NIKA. Therefore the quality of the dichroic is not at the center of this issue.
For comparison, see the NIKA-1 beam maps in Fig.8 of Catalano+2014 and in Fig.8 of Monfardini+2011.
Beams on Mars
- 20151030s73
- 20151031s88
Beams on Uranus
- 20151029s217
- 20151030s174