Describe OffProcNika2Run1Beam here.

Back to NIKA2 Run1 Main page

Discussion on beams

Page last updated, FXD, CK, 2015-11-02 Figures to be redone

We measure the beam by using the middle scan of the 3-scans sequence launched with @beammap Here are the best-of on 3 sources.

Preliminary findings

• The main beam (the Gaussian part) seems with a normal width aka 11", 17" (but only in single-pixel analysis). Blind 2D Gaussian fits to the maps result in broader beams of 13", 19.5" (see Table below).
• The quadrupod holding the secondary gives clear diffraction marks as a faint cross at about -30dB, visible in all Mars scans. Uranus and 3C83 are not bright enough to reach -30dB. To go deeper, we need Saturn or Jupiter maps.
• In between, there is a large near-side lobe, especially at 2mm (but also visible at 1mm), that shows up as a rectangular pyramid-like shape at the 10% level, the origin of which is unknown. It seems to scale with wavelength. It was not so apparent in NIKA. Therefore the quality of the dichroic is not at the center of this issue.

• For comparison, see the NIKA-1 beam maps in Fig.8 of Catalano+2014 and in Fig.8 of Monfardini+2011.

• The following table shows the FWHMs derived from 2D-Gaussian fits to the observed emission.

  • Source	Date/Scan	HPBW	HPBW
    		1mm	2mm
    Mars	20151030s73	12.9	19.3
    Mars	20151031s88	12.7	19.6
    Uranus	20151029s217	14.5	19.5
    Uranus	20151030s174	13.2	19.7
    3C83	20151030s51	14.3	19.4

Beams on Mars

• 20151030s73

  • 

    

• 20151031s88

  • 

    

• 20151028s103

  • 

Beams on Uranus

• 20151029s217

  • 

    

• 20151030s174

  • 

    

Beams on 3C84

• 20151030s51

  • 

    

Theoretical beams from Zemax simulations (SL 2015-11-02)

• The image show the beam at 1mm. For the 2mm band the shape is strictly identical, it is just twice bigger.