|
Size: 1752
Comment:
|
Size: 2121
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 24: | Line 24: |
| {{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73.jpg||width=800}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73_foot.jpg||width=800}} | * 20151030s73 {{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73.jpg||width=800}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151030s73_foot.jpg||width=800}} {{attachment:beam20151030s73.png||height=450}} * 20151031s88 |
| Line 26: | Line 32: |
| {{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88_foot.jpg||width=500}} | {{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Mars_20151031s88_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:beam20151031s88.png||height=450}} |
| Line 30: | Line 38: |
| {{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217_foot.jpg||width=500}} | * 20151029s217 |
| Line 32: | Line 40: |
| {{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174_foot.jpg||width=500}} | {{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151029s217_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:beam20151029s217.png||height=450}} * 20151030s174 {{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_Uranus_20151030s174_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:beam20151030s174.png||height=450}} |
| Line 36: | Line 52: |
| {{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51_foot.jpg||width=500}} | * 20151030s51 {{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51.jpg||width=500}}{{attachment:Beam_3C84_20151030s51_foot.jpg||width=500}} {{attachment:beam20151030s51.png||height=450}} |
Describe OffProcNika2Run1Beam here.
Discussion on beams
Page last updated, FXD, CK, 2015-11-02 Figures to be redone
We measure the beam by using the middle scan of the 3-scans sequence launched with @beammap Here are the best-of on 3 sources.
Preliminary findings
- The main beam (the Gaussian part) seems with a normal width aka 11", 17".
- The quadrupod holding the secondary gives clear diffraction marks as a faint cross visible in all scans.
- In between, there is a large near-side lobe, especially at 2mm (but also visible at 1mm), that shows up as a rectangular pyramid-like shape at the 10% level, the origin of which is unknown. It seems to scale with wavelength. It was not so apparent in NIKA. Therefore the quality of the dichroic is not at the center of this issue.
For comparison, see the NIKA-1 beam maps in Fig.8 of Catalano+2014 and in Fig.8 of Monfardini+2011.
Beams on Mars
- 20151030s73
- 20151031s88
Beams on Uranus
- 20151029s217
- 20151030s174
Beams on 3C84
- 20151030s51
![[ATTACH]](/OffProcNika2Run1Beam?action=AttachFile&do=upload_form&ticket=006657e341.d3146219969777e09619b33ea6c7c82d0ada1a26&target=Beam_3C84_20151030s51.jpg "[ATTACH]"){kind=small}
