Differences between revisions 4 and 6 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 4 as of 2012-04-13 11:57:59
Size: 801
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2012-04-13 12:05:20
Size: 904
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
Work in progress (Don't shoot)
The main document is [[attachment:Run3_Analysis.pdf|here]]
Line 10: Line 11:
{{attachment:NIKA2mmPh6-20111019s52_indFFmxRef1mm22_1_rpp.png | 2mm beams in PF (RZ)}} {{attachment:OffProcNika3/NIKA2mmPh6-20111019s52_indFFmxRef1mm22_1_rpp.png | 2mm beams in PF (RZ)}}

NIKA Run#3 Summary of Off line processing Results

Work in progress (Don't shoot) The main document is here

Focal Plane Geometry and Beams

Both RZ (Mopsic) and NP (IDL, from This pdf) have found a distortion of the focal plane geometry well beyond the expected one.

average FoV 1mm RZ 2mm beams in PF (RZ)

FoV 1mm&2mm NP

The focal plane distortion affects the beams in a correlated fashion with the Focal Plane Geometry distortion. This points towards a general optical distortion common to both detectors (an optical element is misplaced in the optical train).

Glitches and Mars plateau

NIKA3SummOfflineProcResults (last edited 2012-05-07 11:37:11 by NikaBolometer)