|
Size: 2080
Comment:
|
Size: 2441
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 34: | Line 34: |
| == 5 - Glitches and 6 - Mars plateau == | == 5 - Glitches == 4 examples of glitches as seen by all detectors, 2 on the A arry and 2 on the B array. (Scan 64, A665, 20111020) [[attachment:Glitch_study_AGl3.pdf|Glitch on A]], [[attachment:Glitch_study_AGl80.pdf|Another glitch on A]] [[attachment:Glitch_study_BGl20.pdf|Glitch on B]], [[attachment:Glitch_study_BGl50.pdf|Another glitch on B (quite strong)]] == 6 - Mars plateau == |
NIKA Run#3 Summary of Off line processing Results
Work in progress (Don't shoot) The main document is here
3 - Photometry
Evolution of the sky opacity during Run#3
Absolute photometry
Using pointing sources (mostly quasars), we compare the absolute flux measured with NIKA run3 with an estimate obtained using PdB measurements. The summary of the photometry is given here as a spreadsheet and in this figure:
The agreement is reasonable with the fluxes covering from 1.5 to 15 Jy.
Sensitivity
20111019 flux measurements as a spreadsheet and in these figures as: maps and plots
4 - Focal Plane Geometry and Beams
Both RZ (Mopsic) and NP (IDL, from This pdf) have found a distortion of the focal plane geometry well beyond the expected one.
The focal plane distortion affects the beams in a correlated fashion with the Focal Plane Geometry distortion. This points towards a general optical distortion common to both detectors (an optical element is misplaced in the optical train).
5 - Glitches
4 examples of glitches as seen by all detectors, 2 on the A arry and 2 on the B array. (Scan 64, A665, 20111020) Glitch on A, Another glitch on A
Glitch on B, Another glitch on B (quite strong)
6 - Mars plateau
7 Cosmetics
rms of maps per scan per kid per beam averaged over 5 scans
