Differences between revisions 13 and 14
Revision 13 as of 2012-04-23 12:39:20
Size: 1830
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2012-04-23 12:49:23
Size: 1832
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
The main document is [[attachment:Run3_Analysis.pdf|here]] The main document is [[attachment:Run3_Analysisv2.pdf|here]]

NIKA Run#3 Summary of Off line processing Results

Work in progress (Don't shoot) The main document is here

Focal Plane Geometry and Beams

Both RZ (Mopsic) and NP (IDL, from This pdf) have found a distortion of the focal plane geometry well beyond the expected one.

average FoV 1mm RZ 2mm beams in PF (RZ)

FoV 1mm&2mm NP

The focal plane distortion affects the beams in a correlated fashion with the Focal Plane Geometry distortion. This points towards a general optical distortion common to both detectors (an optical element is misplaced in the optical train).

Glitches and Mars plateau

plateau@1mm uPixs Jy

Cosmetics

rms of maps per scan per kid per beam averaged over 5 scans

Noise per scan per kid per beam averaged over 5 scans

Photometry

Evolution of the sky opacity during Run#3

Run#3 225GHz opacity at zenith

Absolute photometry

Using pointing sources (mostly quasars), we compare the absolute flux measured with NIKA run3 with an estimate obtained using PdB measurements. The summary of the photometry is given here as a spreadsheet and in this figure:

Run#3 NIKA vs PdB comparison

The agreement is reasonable with the fluxes covering from 1.5 to 15 Jy.

NIKA3SummOfflineProcResults (last edited 2012-05-07 11:37:11 by NikaBolometer)