Differences between revisions 11 and 12
Revision 11 as of 2026-09-21 10:28:49
Size: 21258
Comment:
Revision 12 as of 2026-09-21 10:31:26
Size: 21260
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 127: Line 127:
[[attachment:260917_60_Piece_of_super-insulation_that_caused_the_leak.jpg|{{attachment:260917_60_Piece_of_super-insulation_that_caused_the_leak.jpg|260917_60_Piece_of_super-insulation_that_caused_the_leak|height=300}}|target="_blank"]]
[[attachment:260917_61_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_at_closing_again_after_having_fixed_the_leak.jpg|{{attachment:260917_61_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_at_closing_again_after_having_fixed_the_leak.jpg|260917_61_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_at_closing_again_after_having_fixed_the_leak|height=300}}|target="_blank"]]
[[attachment:260917_60_Piece_of_super-insulation_that_caused_the_leak.jpeg|{{attachment:260917_60_Piece_of_super-insulation_that_caused_the_leak.jpeg|260917_60_Piece_of_super-insulation_that_caused_the_leak|height=300}}|target="_blank"]]
[[attachment:260917_61_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_at_closing_again_after_having_fixed_the_leak.png|{{attachment:260917_61_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_at_closing_again_after_having_fixed_the_leak.png|260917_61_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_at_closing_again_after_having_fixed_the_leak|height=300}}|target="_blank"]]

Back to the NIKA2 main page

Second intervention on dichroic and Ar2 shims to try compensating 2mm-1mm focus difference witnessed since the March 2026 intervention

Work Plan

Extracted from July 15 regular NIKA2 meetings with few more details:

  • The plan for the intervention is the following: day 1 we open the cryostat and dismount the dichroic ; night 1 we let the dichroic relax ; day 2 we put back the dichroic membrane in its mount, measure its possible residual distortion, and mount it back in the cryostat with shims for Ar2 that depend on the measurement done, then close the cryostat and start vacuum tests ; day 3 continue pumping and start cooling down.
  • From the 2 experiences of cool down after measurement on dichroic (1st NIKA2+ cool down in March 2025, and cool down after shims intervention in March 2026) we experienced that the distortion stayed almost unchanged at 1st cool down after opening. In fact in March 2026 it move from 2.0 mm measured just before closing the cryostat, to 1.5 mm according to the Ar3-Ar2=0.85 mm focus difference at beginning of run 80. Based on this empirical knowledge, depending on the residual distortion after having put the membrane back in its mount there's 2 possibilities:
    • 1) If the distortion is < 0.5 mm we can put back the dichroic in the same orientation as before and insert the shims that compensate exactly for the measured distortion. The chance that the situation after cool down is worse than currently, is negligible.

    • 2) If the distortion is > 0.5 mm, since we can't reduce more the distance between last lens and Ar2, the idea would be to put back the dichroic flipped compared to the present orientation so that the focus shift is not toward the lens but further away from the original position of Ar2, and we insert the shims that compensate for this new focus shift. The chance that the situation after cool down is worse than the current situation is higher than the previous case, because we are not totally sure that the dichroic will stay distorted in the direction that is opposed to the direction it distorted until now. The chances that it reverses its direction of distortion during cool down seem pretty small though. And if the distortion reduces a bit as we expect, we don't know by how much it will exactly.

  • On day 2 of the intervention, before mounting back the dichroic in the cryostat and inserting shims, we can organize a meeting, and describe the situation to take a common decision.

Preliminary work before September 14th, 2026, and staff for the intervention

  • NIKA2 warmed-up, and at ambient pressure
  • Shims at the telescope.
  • Tool box for opening NIKA2 cryostat.
  • Torque wrench at the telescope.

Intervention team: Martino Calvo, Benedetta Kalemi, Samuel Leclercq, David John

All the team at the telescope on Monday 14th, to prepare everything for the intervention on Tuesday morning.

September 15th, Tuesday

Opening NIKA2:

260915_1_Dismounting_NIKA2_nose 260915_2_Dismounting_NIKA2_nose 260915_3_Dismounting_NIKA2_nose 260915_4_Dismounting_NIKA2_nose 260915_5_Dismounting_50K-stage-nose-height-adjustment-tie-rods 260915_6_Unlocking_300K_stage_to_slide_it 260915_7_100K_screen 260915_9_4K_screen 260915_10_1K_screen 260915_11_NIKA2_100mK_stage

Opening of the cryostat quite efficient, done in a bit more than 2 hours.
We measure then the distortion of the dichroic. Side note: on the last picture of the group below one can see very well the inner structures of the dichroic in the reflection of the ruler lightened in green.

260915_14_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_Rx-cabin-side 260915_15_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_center 260915_16_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_Vertex-cabin-side

==> The dichroic is distorted by 2.5 mm, a bit more than the distortion deduced from the Ar3-Ar2 = 1.2 mm focus difference obtained in the latest focus test done before warming up.

We dismount completely the dichroic and let the free membrane relax for 7 hours.

After the 7 hours, the membrane has taken the chips distortion it always had naturally when free of any constraint. Putting it back in the rings and screwing them with a 0.2 N*m torque (intermediate between the 2 previous values), we measure again the residual distortions.

260915_17_30m-Telescope 260915_18_Dichroic_membrane_natural_chips_distortion 260915_19_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_left 260915_20_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_right 260915_21_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_center

==> The membrane didn't relax to a flatter surface! The distortion stays practically unchanged.
==> No need to wait longer, it's clear it won't evolve much more. So we decide to flip it and introduce shims that would compensate for the expected distortion at cold temperature.
Base on previous experience where the membrane flattened by a bit more than 0.5 mm, Samuel do Zemax simulation supposing a 1.5 downward distortion at cold temperature.
==> Zemax simulation says we have to introduce 17 mm shims thickness on Array 2 mount to compensate for the 1.5 mm deep dichroic distortion. So we mount back the flipped dichroic, measure it again as a double check, and put the corresponding group of 3 shims (1 + 0.5 + 0.2 mm thicknesses) on array 2 mount.

260915_22_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_Vertex-cabin-side 260915_23_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_Rx-cabin-side 260915_24_Measuring_dichroic_distance_to_mount-top-face_center 260915_25_dismounting_Array2 260915_26_dismounting_Array2 260915_27_placing_shims_on_Array2_holder 260915_28_remounting_Array2_with_17mm_shims 260915_29_Array2_mounted_with_17mm_shims 260915_30_protecting_100mK_stage_for_the_night 260915_31_sunset_and_moon

The measurements with the dichroic back in place and distortion downward (vs upward previously) gives and amplitude of ~2.0 mm. But this doesn't change the decision made about the shims.
End of day 1.

September 16th, Wednesday

We started measuring again the dichroic distortion before closing. We distortion is still 2.0 mm deep, nothing moved during the night. So we start the process of closing the cryostat.

260916_32_flipped_dichroic_mounted_and_array-2_with_shims_before_closing_cryostat 260916_33_100mK_screen_mounted_back 260916_34_1K_screen_mounted_back 260916_35_4K_screen_mounted_back 260916_36_50K_screen_mounted_back 260916_37_100K_screen_mounted_back 260916_38_300K_screen_mounted_back 260916_39_cleaning_o-ring_of_300K_screen_nose_side 260916_40_mounting_back_4K_baffle 260916_41_mounting_back_M7-M8-50K-assembly 260916_42_tirant_lower_part_in_its_plug_on_the_M7-M8-50K-assembly 260916_43_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_after_adjusting_tirants 260916_44_mounting_back_100K_nose_screen 260916_45_50K_thermal_IR_filter 260916_46_taping_new_superisolant_sheet_on_100K_nose_screen 260916_47_mounting_back_1st-third_of_300K_nose_screen 260916_48_mounting_back_2nd-third_of_300K_nose_screen 260916_49_3rd-third_of_300K_nose_screen_mounted_back 260916_50_releasing_pins_allowing_to_put_back_the_cryostat_at_its_working_position 260916_51_cryostat_nose_side_pin_partially_inserted_in_its_position_hole 260916_52_cryostat_nose_side_pin_fully_inserted_in_its_position_hole

After 4 hours of work, the cryostat is closed and back in place. Note: the 11th picture above shows the fixation device of the lower part of the "tirant" (tie rod / strut) on the 50K part of the nose (M7-M8 assembly); to see the upper part on the 300K cryostat body, look at the 3rd picture of the cryostat opening of the intervention made in march.
We start pumping just before lunch. Unfortunately the leak detector that Dave had send for revision many weeks ago, and that should have been returned to IRAM a few weeks before the intervention, has still not been returned by the contractor.

After lunch the pumping rate is visibly slower than after the previous interventions. It might be a leak, or degassing from the additional super insulation we put during the closing process, or it might be that the auxiliary pumping unit we put to help the cryostat pumping system is less efficient than the leak detector we normally use? Too bad that we don't have the leak detector. It should arrive tomorrow morning. In the meantime we tried reviving a very old spare leak detector, but this was unsuccessful; this unit is broken. Nothing much we can do. We just let the pumping system running.

260916_53_auxiliary_primary_and_turbo_pumps_plugged_to_cryostat 260916_54_cryostat_turbo_pump_bottom_vertex_wall_corner 260916_55_pumping_rate_on_cryostat_control_interface_seems_too_slow 260916_56_old_leak_detector_broken 260916_57_sunset

End of day 2.

September 17th, Thursday

Given the pressure decrease rate overnight, and after having mounted a bigger turbo pump, without much success, it's clear we have a leak. At 9:30 the repaired ASM leak detector arrived at the telescope (thanks to the IRAM Granada staff who picked it up at the depot where the manufacturer had sent it, and drove it up at the telescope as soon as possible). We crane it up in the receiver cabin, mount it on NIKA2 cryostat, and as soon as the vacuum is low enough, we start searching for the leak. We start with the worst place the leak could be: the interface between the 300K body and the base plate to the cryostat... Alas, the leak is there! We try to tighten the screws and add clamps in the hope of applying enough pressure to the two parts to seal the leak. But it doesn't work. The time to do all that it's about 11:45 when we finally decide to open the cryostat again. In principle, Benedetta, Martino and Samuel, should leave in 30 minutes to be at the Malaga airport in time for their trip back home. Having done the check-in online, they decide to postpone their departure by 1 hour to help Dave and Marcos opening the cryostat at least up to the "tirants" and let them dismount these delicate parts with some guidance that would help when closing again the cryostat after having hopefully found and fix the leak. 13:30, 1st "tirant" dismounted, Benedetta, Martino and Samuel leave the telescope hoping that there will be no traffic jam on the road to Malaga airport, and confident that Dave and Marcos, with possibly the help of Victor, will manage to fix the leak and close again the cryostat.

Dave and Marcos found the leak. It was caused by a small piece of torn super-insulation that was crossing the O-ring on the cryostat base plate. It must have moved there when we closed the 300K body, in the last millisecond before it touched the base plate, pushed by the displacement of air (the location was clear and being watched when moving the 300K body!). They clear all the joints again, and carefully close again the cryostat.

260917_58_craning_up_repaired_ASM_leak_detector 260917_59_ASM_leak_detector_plugged_to_NIKA2_and_running 260917_60_Piece_of_super-insulation_that_caused_the_leak 260917_61_height_of_M7-M8-50K-assembly_entrance_window_at_closing_again_after_having_fixed_the_leak

Pumping to try again to put the cryostat under vacuum at the end of the day.

September 18th, Friday

Leak check successful. The rate of pressure drop in the cryostat corresponds to that previously observed in the absence of a leak.
Vacuum reached and NIKA2 is cooling over the weekend, and beginning of the following week.

END of the 2nd intervention mission.

NIKA2+2ndDicIntervention (last edited 2026-09-21 10:31:26 by NikaBolometer)