|
Size: 1695
Comment:
|
← Revision 15 as of 2025-04-08 06:28:47 ⇥
Size: 2222
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 30: | Line 30: |
[[attachment:NIKA2_1MM_MS_v3_10_array1_C2_056.png|{{attachment:NIKA2_1MM_MS_v3_10_array1_C2_056.png|Lab_a1_2025|height=300}}|target="_blank"]] [[attachment:NIKA2_1MM_MS_v3_05_array3_C2_055.png|{{attachment:NIKA2_1MM_MS_v3_05_array3_C2_055.png|Lab_a3_2025|height=300}}|target="_blank"]] Please note that these frequency sweeps were taken in the C2 (CONCERTO2) cryostat under dark conditions. The cold amplifiers gains in C2 is not 100% homogeneous, explaining why some traces show higher transmission in the S21 plots. |
Back to NIKA2 run 72 (Cryo run 84) main page
Noise traces right before the re-commissioning (March 14th sweep; arrays 1, 2 and 3)
Further info at the bottom of this site
NIKA2 transmission curves previously managed
- From preceding commissioning phases
- As given by Perotto et al. 2020:
- Transmission of the new arrays 1 and 3 according to lab measurements (provided by Alessandro Monfardini):
Array 1 (H, reflection) is NIKA2_1mm_MS_v3_10 - Al 25nm - LO 1.755 GHz
Array 3 (V, transmission) is NIKA2_1mm_MS_v3_05 - Al 22nm - LO 1.791 GHz
Please note that these frequency sweeps were taken in the C2 (CONCERTO2) cryostat under dark conditions. The cold amplifiers gains in C2 is not 100% homogeneous, explaining why some traces show higher transmission in the S21 plots.