|
Size: 1095
Comment:
|
Size: 1095
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 17: | Line 17: |
| {{attachment:1mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}} | {{attachment:1mm_map.png||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_map.png||width=700,height=400}} |
| Line 20: | Line 20: |
| {{attachment:1mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} | {{attachment:1mm_profile.png||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.png||width=700,height=400}} |
| Line 23: | Line 23: |
| {{attachment:1mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}} | {{attachment:1mm_time.png||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_time.png||width=700,height=400}} |
Brief analysis of the faint source HLS091828 (z=5.243)
Coordinates:
- R.A. = 09h18m28.6s
- Dec. = 51d42'23.3"
Expected luxes (Combes et al. 2012):
- F1.3sma= 55+-7mJy
- F0.88mm= 125+-8mJy
- F2mm= 15+-7mJy
NIKA obsevations:
Day: 13/06/2013
Scans: 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tuning), 180 to 197
Size of the map:90"x90"
- We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow.
- The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli, and we check that the measured flux is, a priori, consistent with what we expect.
- The time per pixel maps are also shown
- Using Jack-Knives maps, we are able to estimate the noise level in the data.