Differences between revisions 30 and 33 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 30 as of 2013-06-14 14:30:34
Size: 1004
Comment:
Revision 33 as of 2013-06-14 14:36:06
Size: 1051
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
'''''Fluxes (Combes et al. 2012): ''''' '''''Expected luxes (Combes et al. 2012): '''''
Line 17: Line 17:
 {{attachment:1mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
Line 19: Line 28:
 .{{attachment:1mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 .
{{attachment:1mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 .{{attachment:1mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 {{attachment:1mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 {{attachment:1mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}}

Brief analysis of the faint source HLS091828 (z=5.243)

Coordinates:

  • R.A. = 09h18m28.6s
  • Dec. = 51d42'23.3"

Expected luxes (Combes et al. 2012):

  • F1.3sma= 55+-7mJy
  • F0.88mm= 125+-8mJy
  • F2mm= 15+-7mJy

NIKA obsevations:

  • Day: 13/06/2013

  • Scans: 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tuning), 180 to 197

  • Size of the map:90"x90"

  • We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow.

    1mm_map.pdf 2mm_map.pdf

  • The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli, and we check that the measured flux is, a priori, consistent with what we expect.
  • The time per pixel maps are also shown

    1mm_profile.pdf 2mm_profile.pdf 1mm_time.pdf 2mm_time.pdf

HLS091828 (last edited 2013-06-15 07:27:56 by NikaBolometer)