|
Size: 785
Comment:
|
Size: 1004
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 16: | Line 16: |
| .We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow | .We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow. .The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli, and we check that the measured flux is, a priori, consistent with what we expect. .The time per pixel maps are also shown |
| Line 18: | Line 20: |
| . . . .The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli .{{attachment:1mm_profile.pdf||width=500,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.pdf||width=500,height=400}} |
.{{attachment:1mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} .{{attachment:1mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}} |
Brief analysis of the faint source HLS091828 (z=5.243)
Coordinates:
- R.A. = 09h18m28.6s
- Dec. = 51d42'23.3"
Fluxes (Combes et al. 2012):
- F1.3sma= 55+-7mJy
- F0.88mm= 125+-8mJy
- F2mm= 15+-7mJy
NIKA obsevations:
Day: 13/06/2013
Scans: 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tuning), 180 to 197
Size of the map:90"x90"
- We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow.
- The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli, and we check that the measured flux is, a priori, consistent with what we expect.
- The time per pixel maps are also shown