Differences between revisions 24 and 30 (spanning 6 versions)
Revision 24 as of 2013-06-14 14:22:18
Size: 597
Comment:
Revision 30 as of 2013-06-14 14:30:34
Size: 1004
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 14: Line 14:
 .''Scans'': 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tunning), 180 to 197  .''Scans'': 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tuning), 180 to 197
Line 16: Line 16:
 .We detect the source at both wavelenght, shown on the maps given bellow

     {{attachment:1mm_map.pdf||width=800,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_map.pdf||width=800,height=400}}
 .We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow.
 .The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli, and we check that the measured flux is, a priori, consistent with what we expect.
 .The time per pixel maps are also shown
 .{{attachment:1mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 .{{attachment:1mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 .{{attachment:1mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_time.pdf||width=700,height=400}}

Brief analysis of the faint source HLS091828 (z=5.243)

Coordinates:

  • R.A. = 09h18m28.6s
  • Dec. = 51d42'23.3"

Fluxes (Combes et al. 2012):

  • F1.3sma= 55+-7mJy
  • F0.88mm= 125+-8mJy
  • F2mm= 15+-7mJy

NIKA obsevations:

  • Day: 13/06/2013

  • Scans: 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tuning), 180 to 197

  • Size of the map:90"x90"

  • We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow.
  • The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli, and we check that the measured flux is, a priori, consistent with what we expect.
  • The time per pixel maps are also shown
  • 1mm_map.pdf 2mm_map.pdf

  • 1mm_profile.pdf 2mm_profile.pdf

  • 1mm_time.pdf 2mm_time.pdf

HLS091828 (last edited 2013-06-15 07:27:56 by NikaBolometer)