Differences between revisions 19 and 26 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 19 as of 2013-06-14 14:15:34
Size: 574
Comment:
Revision 26 as of 2013-06-14 14:24:55
Size: 776
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 14: Line 14:
 .''Scans': 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tunning), 180 to 197  .''Scans'': 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tuning), 180 to 197
Line 16: Line 16:
 .We detect the source at both wavelenght, shown on the maps given bellow

     
{{attachment:1mm_map.pdf||width=600}} {{attachment:2mm_map.pdf||width=600}}
 .We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow
 .{{attachment:1mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_map.pdf||width=700,height=400}}
 
 .The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli
 .{{attachment:1mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}} {{attachment:2mm_profile.pdf||width=700,height=400}}

Brief analysis of the faint source HLS091828 (z=5.243)

Coordinates:

  • R.A. = 09h18m28.6s
  • Dec. = 51d42'23.3"

Fluxes (Combes et al. 2012):

  • F1.3sma= 55+-7mJy
  • F0.88mm= 125+-8mJy
  • F2mm= 15+-7mJy

NIKA obsevations:

  • Day: 13/06/2013

  • Scans: 9 Lissajous of 5 min each with followed by tracks (for tuning), 180 to 197

  • Size of the map:90"x90"

  • We detect the source at both wavelenghts, shown on the maps given bellow
  • 1mm_map.pdf 2mm_map.pdf

  • The profiles are computed by averaging the map in concentric annuli
  • 1mm_profile.pdf 2mm_profile.pdf

HLS091828 (last edited 2013-06-15 07:27:56 by NikaBolometer)