|
Size: 11929
Comment:
|
Size: 11748
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| = Daily Reports (2026/10/6-13, NIKA2 run 81, Cryo run 93) = | = Daily Reports (2026/10/20-27, NIKA2 run 81, Cryo run 93) = |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| Observers on-site: Rémi, Giorgos, Mairi, Miren | Observers on-site: Philippe André, Samuel Crowe, Jean-François Lestrade, Kaiyi Du |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| AoD: Ioannis | AoD: Miren |
| Line 9: | Line 9: |
| Operators: Pedro, Sergio | Operators: Sergio, Mario |
| Line 11: | Line 11: |
| Please fill the Table with the Ar1,2,3 focus values as follows. At best, make one table per day. |||||||||||||| Focus sequences || || Scan nr || Target || Ar2 || Ar1 || Ar3 || Polarized? || Notes || || 20261007s25-29 || Mars || 1.85 mm || 1.71 mm || 1.70 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs|| || 20261007s33-37 || Mars || 1.76 mm || 1.63 mm || 1.59 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs|| || 20261007s43-47 || 1156+295 || 2 mm || 1.75 mm || 1.75 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs|| || 20261007s48-52 || 1156+295 || 2.2 mm || 1.75 mm || 1.8 mm || no ||with run92.ini and old DAFs || || 20261007s53-57 || 1156+295 || 2.05 mm || 1.78 mm || 1.8 mm || no ||with run92.ini and old DAFs || || 20261007s58-62 || 1156+295 || 2.3 mm || 1.85 mm || 1.83 mm || no ||with run92.ini and old DAFs || || 20261007s65-69 || 1641+399 || 2.35 mm || 1.7 mm || 1.74 mm || no ||with run92.ini and old DAFs || || 20261007s70-74 || 1641+399 || 1.9 mm || 1.75 mm || 1.75 mm || no ||with run92.ini and old DAFs || || 20261007s75-79 || 1641+399 || 1.9 mm || 1.69 mm || 1.71 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs || || 20261007s80-84 || 1641+399 || 2.22 mm || 1.93 mm || 1.96 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs, with the original focus script (0.4 mm steps)|| || 20261007s97-101 || 1641+399 || 2mm || 1.5mm || 1.52mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs, with the original focus script (0.4 mm steps), a2 not well constrained || || 20261007s162-166 || 2200+420 || 1.05 mm || 0.7 mm || 0.71 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs || |
|
| Line 27: | Line 12: |
| |||||||||||||| Focus sequences || || Scan nr || Target || Ar2 || Ar1 || Ar3 || Polarized? || Notes || || 20261008s1-5 || Uranus || 1.36 mm || 1.09 mm || 1.09 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs|| || 20261008s11-15 || Uranus || 1.55 mm || 1.09 mm || 1.10 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A1 value. Not great at 2mm. Using peak values|| || 20261008s16-20 || Uranus || 1.55 mm || 1.18 mm || 1.18 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A2 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s25-29 || Uranus || 1.51 mm || 1.09 mm || 1.11 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A1 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s31-35 || Uranus || 1.41 mm || 1.14 mm || 1.14 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A2 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s40-44 || Uranus || 1.47 mm || 1.09 mm || 1.08 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A1 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s45-49 || Uranus || 1.51 mm || 1.17 mm || 1.17 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A2 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s56-60 || Uranus || 1.32 mm || 1.11 mm || 1.11 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting close to A2 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s67-71 || Uranus || 1.43 mm || 1.05 mm || 1.06 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting close to A1 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s67-71 || 0316+413 || 1.34 mm || 0.99 mm || 0.99 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting close to A1 value. Using peak values|| || 20261008s75-79 || Uranus || 1.43 mm || 1.05 mm || 1.06 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting close to A1 value. Using peak values|| |
|
| Line 41: | Line 13: |
| Similarly, if any beam maps (total power) are taken: |||||||| Beam maps (99 sub-scans)|| || Scan Nr || Target || Focus || Notes || || 20261007s30 || Mars || 1.71 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep || || 20261007s39 || Mars || 1.63 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep || || 20261007s181 || 0316+413 || 0.8 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep, pointing on ??? || || 20261008s8 || 0316+413 || 1.1 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep, pointing on Ar1 || || 20261008s23 || Uranus || 1.18 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep, pointing on Ar1 || || 20261008s38 || Uranus || 1.14 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep, pointing on Ar1 || || 20261008s52 || Uranus || 1.51 mm (Ar2) || run93, new sweep, pointing on Ar2 || || 20261008s63 || Uranus || 1.11 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep, pointing on Ar1 || || 20261008s90 || Uranus || 1.05 mm (Ar1) || run93, new sweep, pointing on Ar2 || |
== Important == |
| Line 54: | Line 15: |
| Please keep track of sweep changes: it makes our life easier when building the DAFs/Kidpars. |||||||| Changes of sweep|| || Sweep || Scan Nr || Time || Notes || || OLD || up to 20261007s29 || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261007s30 || || beammap || || OLD || 20261007s31-38 || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261007s39 || || beammap || || OLD || 20261007s42- || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261007s180- || || beammap || || OLD || 20261007s182 || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261008s7- || || beammap || || OLD || 20261008s9 || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261008s22- || || beammap || || OLD || 20261008s24 || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261008s37- || || beammap || || OLD || 20261008s39 || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261008s51- || || beammap || || OLD || 20261008s55 || || for pointing & focus || || NEW || 20261008s62- || || beammap || |
'''Focus offsets shall be measured on Ar1''' <<BR>> '''Pointing offsets shall be measured on Ar2''' |
| Line 74: | Line 18: |
| ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ---- || OLD || 20261008s65 || || for pointing & focus || ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- ---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ---- === Pool-Account usage: Accounting of observing times === |
== Pool-Account usage: Accounting of observing times == |
| Line 89: | Line 26: |
| == October 6th, 2026, Tuesday == | |
| Line 91: | Line 27: |
| 10:30-15:30 : 3/4 observers arrived at the telescope. Rémi planned to arrive later today. Weather horrible. Maintenance ongoing. | == Book-keeping of important scans == |
| Line 93: | Line 29: |
| Antenna parked all day, clouds, wind, and rain. | We ask you to please keep track of focus sequences (as much as possible) and beam maps (always). Thanks. |
| Line 95: | Line 31: |
| == October 7th, 2026, Wednesday == | === Focus sequences === |
| Line 97: | Line 33: |
| 07:00LT: pointing and focus tests with old sweep (run92). Difference between Ar2 and Ar1 ~0.35 mm. Difference between Ar3 and Ar1 practically 0. 10:00 - 11:30LT: new sweep by M. Calvo. We now have new run93.ini files. 11:45LT: starting NIKA2 observations to get beammaps for the new sweep. Back to run92 for pointing and focus on Mars. DAQ started, lost KIDs Ar1/Ar2/Ar3: 129/6/14; traces look fine. Opacity between 0.3 - 0.5. Peak-to-peak in Ar2 +/- 4-5 Jy/beam. Focus differences: Ar1 - Ar2 = -0.14 mm, Ar1 - Ar3 = 0.01 mm. 12:45LT: moving to run93 for beammaps. Lost KIDs Ar1/Ar2/Ar3: 21/8/30. To be understood if box I is lost or not. Beammap (20261007s30) focused on Ar1. 13h25LT: back to run92 for pointing and focus before another beammap. Lost KIDs Ar1/Ar2/Ar3: 140/7/15. Moving back to run93 for beammaps. Beammap (20261007s39) focused on Ar1. 14h30LT: focus tests with run92. Using the original focus script (with 0.4 mm step) starting from scan 20261007s80. 16h55LT: we try a mini pointing session making use of the sources in the PCCS catalogue provided by S. Berta (we have had to remove the "G" from the names in the end... 13 characters otherwise...) Opacity is ~ 0.35 (tau225 GHz), but a lot of clouds. We can not point, p2p fluctuations @Ar2 of +/- 20 Jy/beam. 19h00LT: We resume. Sky is stable (<5 Jy/beam) and tau around 0.3. Summary: || ''Scan'' || '''Source'''||'''Azimuth'''||'''Elevation'''||'''tau_225GHz'''||'''Azimuth Corr.'''||'''Elevation Corr.'''|| || 91 || 034.61+11.84 || 164 || 59 || 0.3 || -5 || -5 || || 92 || 039.53+28.08 || 202 || 69 || 0.28 || -3 || -6 || || 94 || 022.98+42.17 || 232 || 53 || 0.28 || -3 || -7 || || 96 || 1641+399 || 285 || 71 || 0.28 || -5 || -8 || || 104 || 039.28+62.77 || 274 || 43 || 0.26 || -2.5 || -7 || || 109 || 1641+399 || 287 || 60 || 0.28 || -4.5 || -9 || || 141 || 071.50+55.61 || 305 || 28 || 0.24 || -2 || -4.2 || || 143 || 133.77+42.32 || 351 || 21 || 0.26 || -0.5 || -5 || || 145 || 141.27+25.05 || 372 || 24 || 0.27 || 0 || -2 || || 147 || W3OH || 396 || 41 || 0.26 || -2.8 || -4.2 || || 154 || 121.67-05.69 || 400 || 57 || 0.26 || -6 || -4 || || 157 || 112.91-09.88 || 401 ||68 || 0.26 || -6.5 || -3 || || 159 || 098.48-15.81 || 402 || 84 || 0.27 || -8.7 || -1 || || 161 || 2200+420 || 307 || 81 || 0.24 || -3 || -4.3 || || || || || || || || || ||'''Average'''|| || || '''??''' || '''??''' || '''??'''|| || ||'''SD'''|| || || '''??''' || '''??'''|| '''??'''|| || |
Please fill the Table with the Ar1,2,3 focus values as follows. At best, make one table per day. |||||||||||||| Focus sequences || || Scan nr || Target || Ar2 || Ar1 || Ar3 || Polarized? || Notes || || 20261020s44-48 || 1830-211 || 1.35 || 1.04 || 1.02 || no || starting at 1mm || || 20261020s74-78 || K3-50A || 1.40 || 1.13 || 1.13 || no || scatter A2 || || 20261020s101-105 || Uranus || 1.51 || 1.03 || 1.03 || yes || || || 20261021s9-13 || 3C454 || 1.64 || 1.14 || 1.17 || yes || || || 20261021s28-32 || Uranus || 1.48 || 1.17 || 1.2 || yes || || || 20261021s59-63 || 0316+413 || bad || 1.05 || 1.03 || no || started 1.14mm || || 20261021s77-81 || 1226+023 ||bad || bad || bad || no || started 1.05 mm; realized we were very far out of focus || || 20261021s82-86 || 1226+023 || 0.7 || 0.51 || 0.51 || no || started 0.5 mm || || 20261021s94-98 || 1641+399 || bad || 0.4 || 0.4 || no || started at 0.5 mm || || 20261021s123-127 || 1226+023 || bad || 0.6 || 0.55 || no || started at 0.5 mm || || 20261021s139-143 || 1226+023 || bad || 0.9 || 0.8 || no || started at 0.5 mm || || 20261021s146-150 || K3-50A || bad || 0.8 || 0.8 || no || started at 1 mm || || 20261021s164-168 || K3-50A || 1.12 || 0.74 || 0.79 || no || started at 0.8 mm || || 20261021s185-189 || 1928+738 || 1.7 || 1.2 || 1.22 || no || started at 1 mm || || 20261021s213-217 || Uranus || 1.62 || 1.15 || 1.17 || yes || started at 1.2 mm || || 20261022s17-21 || Uranus || 1.69 || 1.30 || 1.32 || yes || started at 1.15 mm || || 20261022s28-32 || Uranus || 1.75 || 1.23 || 1.25 || yes || started at 1.30 mm || || 20261022s48-52 || 0316+413 || bad || 1.01 || 0.98 || no || started at 1.25 mm; huge scatter in arr2 focus fits || || 20261022s58-62 || 0851+202 || bad || 1.3 || 1.4 || no || started 1.00 mm; large scatter so we ran it again || || 20261022s63-67 || 0851+202 || 1.6 || 1.2 || 1.2 || no || started 1.3 mm || || 20261022s78-82 || 0851+202 || 0.98 || 0.75 || 0.75 || no || started 1.2 mm || || 20261022s94-98 || 1633+382 || 0.91 || 0.67 || 0.67 || no || started at 0.75 mm || || 20261022s109-113 || 3C286 || bad || 0.75 || 0.74 || yes || started at 0.67 mm || || 20261022s126-130 || 3C454 || bad || 0.77 || 0.73 || yes || started at 0.75 mm || || 20261022s146-150 || 3C545 || bad || 1.2 || 1.2 || yes || started at 1.0 mm || || 20261022s184-188 || Uranus || 1.53 || 1.09 || 1.11 || yes || started at 1.2 mm || || 20261023s31-35 || Uranus || 1.63 || 1.32 || 1.34 || yes || started at 1.41 mm || || 20261023s65-69 || Uranus || bad || 1.09 || 1.08 || no || started at 1.32 mm || || 20261023s78-82 || 0851+202 || 1.4 || 1.08 || 1.08 || no || started at 1.09 mm || || 20261023s107-111 || 1633+382 || bad || 1.05 || 1.04 || no || started at 1.08 mm || |
| Line 142: | Line 68: |
| == October 8th, 2026, Thursday == | === Beam maps === |
| Line 144: | Line 70: |
| 00:30LT Stable (=/-2 Jy/beam) and good opacity (~ 0.25). Better beammaps are needed. We move to 0316+413 for first beammaps, waiting Uranus to be high. 1am --> 7am (Rémi) : stable weather, clear sky and opacity ~ 0.25 for the entire shift. * 2 beam maps on 0316+413 with focus and pointing optimized for A1, plus several pointing and focus * 2 beam maps on Uranus with focus and pointing optimized for A1, plus several pointing and focus * 1 beam map on Uranus with focus and pointing optimized for A2, plus several pointing and focus * 1 skydip (using the new sweep): scan 20261008s53 * 1 beam map on Uranus with focus and pointing optimized for A1, plus several pointing and focus Remarks: 1) the focus offset difference between A1/3 and A2 is about 0.3. However, the A2 (FWHM_x x FWHM_y)^1/2 is alway >21" and the beam is elongated: at best we have ~20"x25". The shape is not the same as the one we use to have. Issue with the current DAFs? The dichroic? Lateral focus (but this should also affect A1/3)? Other? 2) The best focus can vary by up to 0.1mm for A1/3 depending if we start from the current A1/3 or A2 value: systematic positive shift when starting with A2 value. 1am --> 7am (Giorgos) : |
Similarly, if any beam maps (total power) are taken: |||||||| Beam maps (99 sub-scans)|| || Scan Nr || Target || Focus || Notes || || || || || || || || || || || |
| Line 165: | Line 77: |
| ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ---- * finish the beammap of Remi's shift, do a skydip, and back to old sweep |
|
| Line 168: | Line 78: |
| ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- ---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ---- ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ---- ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- 7am --> 1pm (Giorgos) : * finish the beammap of Remi's shift and back to old sweep * start test scans of project 092-26. Opacity increasing. Ar2 beam very elongated. |
Similarly, if any beam maps (polar) are taken: |||||||| Beam maps (95 sub-scans)|| || Scan Nr || Target || Focus || Notes || || || || || || || || || || || |
| Line 181: | Line 85: |
| ---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ---- | == October 20th, 2026, Tuesday == All observers arrive at the telescope. 16h20 - 19 LT, Kaiyi & Miren: * 16h20 LT: end of maintenance. Very cloudy and opacity around 0.44, doing system check with EMIR. * 17h27 LT: We did some repetitions on 030-26 (EMIR). 19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: Now opacity is around 0.35 and stable with p2p atmo fluctuations less than +/- 2 Jy/beam but 3 spikes on the taumeter during the session although sky looks fairly clear. Move to NIKA2 and project 093-26 and did 9 targets (cal_1scan). Then Observe secondary calibrator MWC349 (20261020s83) and a skydip (20261020s84). Then Miren switch to polarimetry with HWP for project 084-25: source G094.6028 with calibration scan on 3C454 before and after, we add a calibration scan on Uranus that is now above 40deg. Focus did not change significantly during the session (1.04-1.13). Pointing offsets are large (15") but consistent thru the run. |
| Line 184: | Line 101: |
| == October 9th, 2026, Friday == | == October 21st, 2026, Wednesday == |
| Line 186: | Line 103: |
| == October 10th, 2026, Saturday == | 1 - 7 LT, Philippe: Opacity (tau225) fluctuating between ~0.4 and ~0.3. Observed 1 repetition on G094.6028 and 1 repetition on G100.38 for project 084-25. Did a calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261021s33) in polarized mode. Took 1 full repetition plus 2 of 3 scans of observe_G111a for 031-26 (stopped after 2 scans as elevation was getting quite low for polarimetry). Switched to TP (47Hz) at 6:45 LT. Did another calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261021s45) in total power (47Hz) and a skydip (20261021s46). |
| Line 188: | Line 108: |
| == October 11th, 2026, Sunday == | 7 - 13 LT, Samuel: Opacity (tau225) started around 0.3 but steadily dropped throughout the morning to around 0.2. Started with project 082-26 observing NGC4449. Took 4 full repetitions of 2 scans each on NGC4449, then switched to observing IC0342 for project 083-26 because the opacity was so low. Finished one full repetition of 5 scans on IC0342. Project 083-26 is now completed. Took one scan of n2edf (half a repetition) for project 092-26, before cancelling the second scan of the repetition because the opacity went above 0.3 and began fluctuating. Switched back to project 082-26 to observe NGC4449 but it was too high so we cancelled. There is no other high priority option at 47 Hz TP (and this opacity) so we switched to 23 Hz TP to observe 093-26. We started data acquisition at 13:02 local time with lost kids, array 1/2/3 = 18, 9, 24. |
| Line 190: | Line 110: |
| == October 12th, 2026, Monday == | 13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: opacity (tau225) started with ~0.35. Started with project 093-26. We switched from 23 Hz TP to 47Hz TP at 14:48 with lost kids, Ar1/2/3 = 18,9,26. We switched to project 082-26 and completed 4 repetitions (1hr) on NGC4449. Opacity became very good, tau=0.25~0.15, therefore we changed to project 092-26, and complete one repetition. We did calib_1scan on NGC7027 (20261021s158), MWC349 (20261021s159) & CRL2688 (20261021s160). Then we switched back to project 092-26 and run one new repetition. |
| Line 192: | Line 112: |
| == October 13th, 2026, Tuesday == | 19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: tau225 between 0.15 and 0.1 all along the run. Project 092-26 TP 47Hz : 5 repetitions completed. At some point resonances were somewhat spread out, so Miren retuned. Move to polar mode. One Cal_1scan on Neptune (20261021s194) for calibration IP. Then project 084-25 : 1 repetition on target G094.6028 with IP cal on quasar 4C454 before and after. On cal_1scan on Neptune for calibration IP (20261021s194). == October 22nd, 2026, Thursday == 1 - 7 LT, Philippe: Very good (clear and stable) sky conditions, with opacity (tau225) ~0.15 throughout the shift. Observed B-FUN (015-17) polarimetry project: 2 repetitions of observe_b213_polar before transit, 1 repetition of observe_ngc2024n_polar near transit, and 2 repetitions of observe_b213_polar after transit. Did a calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261021s218) in polarized mode. 7 - 13 LT, Samuel: Clear and stable sky conditions continued from the night; opacity (tau225) ~0.15. Did a fifth repetition of observe_b213_polar and a calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261022s39) in polarized mode. Did a final calibration scan on Uranus (calib_1scan:20261022s45) in polarized mode before switching to project 043-26. Completed one full execution of observe_S284-3.pako (1 hour). We then switched to TP 47 Hz to take observations of NGC4449 for project 082-26. 13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: Good sky conditions (tau225~0.13). We did two repetitions of project 092-26. Switched from 47Hz TP to Pol at 15:50. We did one repetition on G24.78 of project 049-26. 19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: excellent sky tau=0.1-0.13 throughout the shift. NIKA-Pol. Continue project : 1 repetition 049-26 : G24.78 and 3C454 for IP calib. Did 1 primary calibrator Neptune Cal_1scn (20261022s153). Move to project 084-25 : 2 repetitions G094.6028 and 3C454 for IP calib. == October 23rd, 2026, Friday == 1 - 7 LT, Philippe: Sky conditions quickly degrading at the beginning of the shift with tau225 increasing from ~0.15 to ~0.35 with large fluctuations around 0.3 in the middle of the shift. Partly cloudy to cloudy. Stability was good at the beginning (+/-2 Jy/beam @ 2mm) but got worse (+/-5 Jy to +/- 10 Jy/beam depending on the region of the sky) in the middle of the shift before improving again. Continued nevertheless with polarimetry. Observed 1 repetition of observe_ngc1333n_polar for B-FUN (015-17), 1 repetition on G100.38 for 084-25, 1 repetition observe_G111b for 031-26, and finally 1 repetition of observe_ngc2024n_polar for B-FUN. Did two calibrations on Uranus (primary calibrator): 20261022s189 and 20261023s26. 7 - 13 LT, Samuel: Sky conditions improved since the night but still a bit unstable. tau225 generally decreasing down to about 0.15 with sporadic jumps up to 0.25. Occasional jumps in the p2p noise as well. Finished the repetition on ngc2024n with a break before the third scan to recalibrate the KIDS. Completed a calibration on Uranus (20261023s54) and 1 more repetition of observe_ngc2024n_polar for B-FUN (project 015-17). Finished with a calibration on Uranus (20261023s63) before switching to TP 23 Hz to observe 1 repetition (1 hour) of s284-1 for project 043-26. Switched to TP 47Hz to observe NGC4449 for project 082-26. Finished one leftover scan from yesterday (because of tracking warnings) before completing 4 full repetitions (1 hour). Started 4 more repetitions on NGC4449. 13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: 19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: == October 24th, 2026, Saturday == 1 - 7 LT, Philippe: 7 - 13 LT, Samuel: 13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: 19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: == October 25th, 2026, Sunday == 1 - 7 LT, Philippe: 7 - 13 LT, Samuel: 13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: 19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: == October 26th, 2026, Monday == 1 - 7 LT, Philippe: 7 - 13 LT, Samuel: 13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: 19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: == October 27th, 2026, Tuesday == 1 - 7 LT, Philippe: 7 - 13 LT, Samuel: |
Daily Reports (2026/10/20-27, NIKA2 run 81, Cryo run 93)
Observers on-site: Philippe André, Samuel Crowe, Jean-François Lestrade, Kaiyi Du
AoD: Miren
Operators: Sergio, Mario
Important
Focus offsets shall be measured on Ar1
Pointing offsets shall be measured on Ar2
Pool-Account usage: Accounting of observing times
Calibration observations like pointing, focus, and calib_1scan (the latter in case of NIKA2-Pol only, aimed at characterizing the instrumental polarization) which are conducted before and during project observations are part of the project time. Note that all proposals include such overheads in the time and sensitivity estimates. This holds for total power and polarimetry observations.
Other calibration observations which are important for all projects like beam maps, skydips, or calib_1scan for absolute flux calibration may be accounted under the pool account (nikaX-YY, where X = s,w and YY = year).
- When conditions are unstable and it is unclear whether project observations make sense at all, calibrations may be accounted to the pool account.
Book-keeping of important scans
We ask you to please keep track of focus sequences (as much as possible) and beam maps (always). Thanks.
Focus sequences
Please fill the Table with the Ar1,2,3 focus values as follows. At best, make one table per day.
Focus sequences
Scan nr
Target
Ar2
Ar1
Ar3
Polarized?
Notes
20261020s44-48
1830-211
1.35
1.04
1.02
no
starting at 1mm
20261020s74-78
K3-50A
1.40
1.13
1.13
no
scatter A2
20261020s101-105
Uranus
1.51
1.03
1.03
yes
20261021s9-13
3C454
1.64
1.14
1.17
yes
20261021s28-32
Uranus
1.48
1.17
1.2
yes
20261021s59-63
0316+413
bad
1.05
1.03
no
started 1.14mm
20261021s77-81
1226+023
bad
bad
bad
no
started 1.05 mm; realized we were very far out of focus
20261021s82-86
1226+023
0.7
0.51
0.51
no
started 0.5 mm
20261021s94-98
1641+399
bad
0.4
0.4
no
started at 0.5 mm
20261021s123-127
1226+023
bad
0.6
0.55
no
started at 0.5 mm
20261021s139-143
1226+023
bad
0.9
0.8
no
started at 0.5 mm
20261021s146-150
K3-50A
bad
0.8
0.8
no
started at 1 mm
20261021s164-168
K3-50A
1.12
0.74
0.79
no
started at 0.8 mm
20261021s185-189
1928+738
1.7
1.2
1.22
no
started at 1 mm
20261021s213-217
Uranus
1.62
1.15
1.17
yes
started at 1.2 mm
20261022s17-21
Uranus
1.69
1.30
1.32
yes
started at 1.15 mm
20261022s28-32
Uranus
1.75
1.23
1.25
yes
started at 1.30 mm
20261022s48-52
0316+413
bad
1.01
0.98
no
started at 1.25 mm; huge scatter in arr2 focus fits
20261022s58-62
0851+202
bad
1.3
1.4
no
started 1.00 mm; large scatter so we ran it again
20261022s63-67
0851+202
1.6
1.2
1.2
no
started 1.3 mm
20261022s78-82
0851+202
0.98
0.75
0.75
no
started 1.2 mm
20261022s94-98
1633+382
0.91
0.67
0.67
no
started at 0.75 mm
20261022s109-113
3C286
bad
0.75
0.74
yes
started at 0.67 mm
20261022s126-130
3C454
bad
0.77
0.73
yes
started at 0.75 mm
20261022s146-150
3C545
bad
1.2
1.2
yes
started at 1.0 mm
20261022s184-188
Uranus
1.53
1.09
1.11
yes
started at 1.2 mm
20261023s31-35
Uranus
1.63
1.32
1.34
yes
started at 1.41 mm
20261023s65-69
Uranus
bad
1.09
1.08
no
started at 1.32 mm
20261023s78-82
0851+202
1.4
1.08
1.08
no
started at 1.09 mm
20261023s107-111
1633+382
bad
1.05
1.04
no
started at 1.08 mm
Beam maps
Similarly, if any beam maps (total power) are taken:
Beam maps (99 sub-scans)
Scan Nr
Target
Focus
Notes
Similarly, if any beam maps (polar) are taken:
Beam maps (95 sub-scans)
Scan Nr
Target
Focus
Notes
October 20th, 2026, Tuesday
All observers arrive at the telescope.
16h20 - 19 LT, Kaiyi & Miren:
- 16h20 LT: end of maintenance. Very cloudy and opacity around 0.44, doing system check with EMIR.
- 17h27 LT: We did some repetitions on 030-26 (EMIR).
19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: Now opacity is around 0.35 and stable with p2p atmo fluctuations less than +/- 2 Jy/beam but 3 spikes on the taumeter during the session although sky looks fairly clear. Move to NIKA2 and project 093-26 and did 9 targets (cal_1scan). Then Observe secondary calibrator MWC349 (20261020s83) and a skydip (20261020s84). Then Miren switch to polarimetry with HWP for project 084-25: source G094.6028 with calibration scan on 3C454 before and after, we add a calibration scan on Uranus that is now above 40deg.
Focus did not change significantly during the session (1.04-1.13). Pointing offsets are large (15") but consistent thru the run.
October 21st, 2026, Wednesday
1 - 7 LT, Philippe: Opacity (tau225) fluctuating between ~0.4 and ~0.3. Observed 1 repetition on G094.6028 and 1 repetition on G100.38 for project 084-25. Did a calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261021s33) in polarized mode. Took 1 full repetition plus 2 of 3 scans of observe_G111a for 031-26 (stopped after 2 scans as elevation was getting quite low for polarimetry). Switched to TP (47Hz) at 6:45 LT. Did another calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261021s45) in total power (47Hz) and a skydip (20261021s46).
7 - 13 LT, Samuel: Opacity (tau225) started around 0.3 but steadily dropped throughout the morning to around 0.2. Started with project 082-26 observing NGC4449. Took 4 full repetitions of 2 scans each on NGC4449, then switched to observing IC0342 for project 083-26 because the opacity was so low. Finished one full repetition of 5 scans on IC0342. Project 083-26 is now completed. Took one scan of n2edf (half a repetition) for project 092-26, before cancelling the second scan of the repetition because the opacity went above 0.3 and began fluctuating. Switched back to project 082-26 to observe NGC4449 but it was too high so we cancelled. There is no other high priority option at 47 Hz TP (and this opacity) so we switched to 23 Hz TP to observe 093-26. We started data acquisition at 13:02 local time with lost kids, array 1/2/3 = 18, 9, 24.
13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: opacity (tau225) started with ~0.35. Started with project 093-26. We switched from 23 Hz TP to 47Hz TP at 14:48 with lost kids, Ar1/2/3 = 18,9,26. We switched to project 082-26 and completed 4 repetitions (1hr) on NGC4449. Opacity became very good, tau=0.25~0.15, therefore we changed to project 092-26, and complete one repetition. We did calib_1scan on NGC7027 (20261021s158), MWC349 (20261021s159) & CRL2688 (20261021s160). Then we switched back to project 092-26 and run one new repetition.
19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: tau225 between 0.15 and 0.1 all along the run. Project 092-26 TP 47Hz : 5 repetitions completed. At some point resonances were somewhat spread out, so Miren retuned. Move to polar mode. One Cal_1scan on Neptune (20261021s194) for calibration IP. Then project 084-25 : 1 repetition on target G094.6028 with IP cal on quasar 4C454 before and after. On cal_1scan on Neptune for calibration IP (20261021s194).
October 22nd, 2026, Thursday
1 - 7 LT, Philippe: Very good (clear and stable) sky conditions, with opacity (tau225) ~0.15 throughout the shift. Observed B-FUN (015-17) polarimetry project: 2 repetitions of observe_b213_polar before transit, 1 repetition of observe_ngc2024n_polar near transit, and 2 repetitions of observe_b213_polar after transit. Did a calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261021s218) in polarized mode.
7 - 13 LT, Samuel: Clear and stable sky conditions continued from the night; opacity (tau225) ~0.15. Did a fifth repetition of observe_b213_polar and a calibration on Uranus (calib_1scan: 20261022s39) in polarized mode. Did a final calibration scan on Uranus (calib_1scan:20261022s45) in polarized mode before switching to project 043-26. Completed one full execution of observe_S284-3.pako (1 hour). We then switched to TP 47 Hz to take observations of NGC4449 for project 082-26.
13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi: Good sky conditions (tau225~0.13). We did two repetitions of project 092-26. Switched from 47Hz TP to Pol at 15:50. We did one repetition on G24.78 of project 049-26.
19 - 1 LT, Jean-François: excellent sky tau=0.1-0.13 throughout the shift. NIKA-Pol. Continue project : 1 repetition 049-26 : G24.78 and 3C454 for IP calib. Did 1 primary calibrator Neptune Cal_1scn (20261022s153). Move to project 084-25 : 2 repetitions G094.6028 and 3C454 for IP calib.
October 23rd, 2026, Friday
1 - 7 LT, Philippe: Sky conditions quickly degrading at the beginning of the shift with tau225 increasing from ~0.15 to ~0.35 with large fluctuations around 0.3 in the middle of the shift. Partly cloudy to cloudy. Stability was good at the beginning (+/-2 Jy/beam @ 2mm) but got worse (+/-5 Jy to +/- 10 Jy/beam depending on the region of the sky) in the middle of the shift before improving again. Continued nevertheless with polarimetry. Observed 1 repetition of observe_ngc1333n_polar for B-FUN (015-17), 1 repetition on G100.38 for 084-25, 1 repetition observe_G111b for 031-26, and finally 1 repetition of observe_ngc2024n_polar for B-FUN. Did two calibrations on Uranus (primary calibrator): 20261022s189 and 20261023s26.
7 - 13 LT, Samuel: Sky conditions improved since the night but still a bit unstable. tau225 generally decreasing down to about 0.15 with sporadic jumps up to 0.25. Occasional jumps in the p2p noise as well. Finished the repetition on ngc2024n with a break before the third scan to recalibrate the KIDS. Completed a calibration on Uranus (20261023s54) and 1 more repetition of observe_ngc2024n_polar for B-FUN (project 015-17). Finished with a calibration on Uranus (20261023s63) before switching to TP 23 Hz to observe 1 repetition (1 hour) of s284-1 for project 043-26. Switched to TP 47Hz to observe NGC4449 for project 082-26. Finished one leftover scan from yesterday (because of tracking warnings) before completing 4 full repetitions (1 hour). Started 4 more repetitions on NGC4449.
13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi:
19 - 1 LT, Jean-François:
October 24th, 2026, Saturday
1 - 7 LT, Philippe:
7 - 13 LT, Samuel:
13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi:
19 - 1 LT, Jean-François:
October 25th, 2026, Sunday
1 - 7 LT, Philippe:
7 - 13 LT, Samuel:
13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi:
19 - 1 LT, Jean-François:
October 26th, 2026, Monday
1 - 7 LT, Philippe:
7 - 13 LT, Samuel:
13 - 19 LT, Kaiyi:
19 - 1 LT, Jean-François:
October 27th, 2026, Tuesday
1 - 7 LT, Philippe:
7 - 13 LT, Samuel: