Differences between revisions 36 and 37
Revision 36 as of 2026-01-15 12:25:35
Size: 6140
Comment:
Revision 37 as of 2026-01-15 13:47:29
Size: 6412
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 103: Line 103:
 * 140-25 .. repetitions of Cloud G, using 2251+158 (3C454) and Neptune as IP calibrators
 * @13:40 the imbf of scan 92 is not being produced by the new make-imbf. We do not stop/restart it, so that the people in charge of it can directly see "live" what is happening. Meanwhile we use the old make-imbf. if in half an hour is not back, SB will stop/restart it.
 * 140-25 one repetitions of Cloud G, using 2251+158 (3C454) and Neptune as IP calibrators

Back to the NIKA2 main page

Daily Reports (2026/01/13-20, NIKA2 run 78, Cryo run 90)

Observers on-site: Ste B, Cheng Yu, Rubén Fedriani, Paul Law, Andrea Bracco

Astronomer on Duty: Ioannis Myserlis
Pool Manager: Angel Bongiovanni

Operators: Joaquín Santiago (day) and Gloria Liñan (night)

Organization of shifts:
03:00-09:00 UT: Stefano Berta
09:00:15:00 UT: Cheng Yu and Rubén Fedriani
15:00-21:00 UT: Paul Law
21:00-03:00 UT: Andrea Bracco

Important

Focus offsets shall be measured on Ar1
Pointing offsets shall be measured on Ar2

Pool-Account usage: Accounting of observing times

  • Calibration observations like pointing, focus, and calib_1scan (the latter in case of NIKA2-Pol only, aimed at characterizing the instrumental polarization) which are conducted before and during project observations are part of the project time. Note that all proposals include such overheads in the time and sensitivity estimates. This holds for total power and polarimetry observations.

  • Other calibration observations which are important for all projects like beam maps, skydips, or calib_1scan for absolute flux calibration may be accounted under the pool account (nikaX-YY, where X = s,w and YY = year ; nikaw-25 in this case).

  • When conditions are unstable and it is unclear whether project observations make sense at all, calibrations may be accounted to the pool account.

Focus and Beam maps accounting

Please fill the Table with the Ar1,2,3 focus values as follows. At best, make one table per day.

  • Focus sequences (NOTE: Ar2 is very noisy and this might influence the A2 focus value)

    Scans nr.

    Target

    Ar2

    Ar1

    Ar3

    Pol?

    Notes

    20260115s2-6

    3C273

    0.30

    uhm

    out

    no

    started at 1.0 mm; Ar1 only marginally covered by the focus range -> re-do

    7-11

    3C273

    out

    1.31

    1.54

    no

    started at 1.4 mm;

    42-46

    1757-240

    out

    1.22

    1.41

    no

    started at 1.6 mm;

    53-57

    MWC349

    0.48

    1.47

    out

    no

    started at 1.22 mm

    70-74

    2251+158

    out

    1.42

    1.62

    yes

    started at 1.47 mm

Similarly, if any beam maps (total power or polarimetry) are taken:

  • Beam maps

    Scan Nr

    Target

    Focus

    TP (99 subscans) or Pol (95 subscans)

    Notes

Tuesday, 13th January 2026

We start the new week!

9:30-14:30 UT: Maintenance time

14:30-00:00 UT: Stopped due to high wind, fog and snow. In the afternoon we had a training session on NIKA2 observations with on-site observers.

Wednesday, 14th January 2026

00:00-9:00 UT: Still stopped. Snowing in the morning.

09:00-13:00 UT still stopped for wind and thick clouds

12:30-14:15 UT: Sky clears up a bit so we start with EMIR backup observations of project 150-25 at ~13:00 UT. This is the only project available for observations right now, even if it <15 deg away from the Sun, keeping in mind that E150 is not working. Anyway, after 1 hr the weather is getting bad again (pwv >= 10mm) and we park the telescope once more.

14:15-20:00 UT: Telescope stopped. Bad weather.

20:00-04:00 UT: Telescope parked. No night operator until tomorrow due to personal reasons.

A shy Sun is trying to melt the clouds

Thursday, 15th January 2026

03:45-09:00 UT Stefano:

  • @03:45 we start the NIKA2 total power observations; lost KIDs: 20/7/24; tau(225)=0.27; temperature -8 C; wind 2 m/s. Stability: peak to peak sky variation along the timelines < +/- 0.5 Jy/beam on pointing scans @2mm.

  • 197-25 four repetitions of CL3. Note: the first three repetitions were taken with 47 Hz sampling. No big deal: actually they'll be less affected by sky "instabilities".
  • 166-25 one repetition of GC1. Lots of haze in the l.o.s. in the second scan. We do not observe 166-25 any further.

09:00-15:00 UT Ruben and Cheng (+ Stefano and Ioannis):

  • calibrations: MWC349 (scan 58), NGC7027 (scan 59), CRL 2688 (scan 60), Skydip (scan 61)
  • 166-25 one repetition on GC3.
  • @11:15 UT we switch to polarimetry. Lost KIDs 12/6/20.
  • 140-25 one repetition on Cloud D, using 2251+158 (3C454) as IP calibrator
  • @13:40 the imbf of scan 92 is not being produced by the new make-imbf. We do not stop/restart it, so that the people in charge of it can directly see "live" what is happening. Meanwhile we use the old make-imbf. if in half an hour is not back, SB will stop/restart it.
  • 140-25 one repetitions of Cloud G, using 2251+158 (3C454) and Neptune as IP calibrators

15:00-21:00 UT Paul:

  • ...

21:00-03:00 UT Andrea:

  • ...

Friday, 16th January 2026

DailyReportsNika2Pool130126 (last edited 2026-01-20 07:56:21 by NikaBolometer)