Differences between revisions 151 and 152
Revision 151 as of 2026-01-18 23:57:21
Size: 15795
Comment:
Revision 152 as of 2026-01-19 00:11:43
Size: 15795
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 234: Line 234:
 * Total power to polarization @00:00 ut  * Total power to polarization @01:10 ut

Back to the NIKA2 main page

Daily Reports (2026/01/13-20, NIKA2 run 78, Cryo run 90)

Observers on-site: Ste B, Cheng Yu, Rubén Fedriani, Paul Law, Andrea Bracco

Astronomer on Duty: Ioannis Myserlis
Pool Manager: Angel Bongiovanni

Operators: Joaquín Santiago (day) and Gloria Liñan (night)

Organization of shifts:
03:00-09:00 UT: Stefano Berta
09:00:15:00 UT: Cheng Yu and Rubén Fedriani
15:00-21:00 UT: Paul Law
21:00-03:00 UT: Andrea Bracco

Important

Focus offsets shall be measured on Ar1
Pointing offsets shall be measured on Ar2

Pool-Account usage: Accounting of observing times

  • Calibration observations like pointing, focus, and calib_1scan (the latter in case of NIKA2-Pol only, aimed at characterizing the instrumental polarization) which are conducted before and during project observations are part of the project time. Note that all proposals include such overheads in the time and sensitivity estimates. This holds for total power and polarimetry observations.

  • Other calibration observations which are important for all projects like beam maps, skydips, or calib_1scan for absolute flux calibration may be accounted under the pool account (nikaX-YY, where X = s,w and YY = year ; nikaw-25 in this case).

  • When conditions are unstable and it is unclear whether project observations make sense at all, calibrations may be accounted to the pool account.

Focus and Beam maps accounting

Please fill the Table with the Ar1,2,3 focus values as follows. At best, make one table per day.

  • Focus sequences (NOTE: Ar2 is very noisy and this might influence the A2 focus value)

    Scans nr.

    Target

    Ar2

    Ar1

    Ar3

    Pol?

    Notes

    20260115s2-6

    3C273

    0.30

    uhm

    out

    no

    started at 1.0 mm; Ar1 only marginally covered by the focus range -> re-do

    7-11

    3C273

    out

    1.31

    1.54

    no

    started at 1.4 mm;

    42-46

    1757-240

    out

    1.22

    1.41

    no

    started at 1.6 mm;

    53-57

    MWC349

    0.48

    1.47

    out

    no

    started at 1.22 mm

    70-74

    2251+158

    out

    1.42

    1.62

    yes

    started at 1.47 mm

    104-108

    Neptune

    out

    1.30

    1.50

    yes

    started at 1.42 mm

    20260117s3-7

    1757-240

    out

    2.02

    2.22

    no

    started at 2.1 mm (de-icing stopped 1h ago)

    ...?

    41-45

    Uranus

    0.77

    1.4

    1.58

    yes

    started at 1.8 mm

    58-62

    Uranus

    out

    1.06

    1.28

    yes

    started at 1.4 mm

    64-68

    Uranus

    0.23

    1.05

    1.30

    yes

    started at 1.0 mm

    80-84

    Uranus

    0.62

    out

    out

    yes

    started at 0.9 mm -> re-do

    85-89

    Uranus

    out

    1.62

    1.85

    yes

    started 1.9 mm, outside temperature dropped to -12 C

    100-104

    Uranus

    0.73

    1.65

    1.94

    yes

    started 1.62 mm, Ar2 flux only

    114-118

    Uranus

    out

    1.45

    1.66

    yes

    started 1.65 mm

    20260118s16-20

    3C286

    out

    1.05

    1.32

    yes

    started 1.45mm

    32-36

    3C279

    out

    1.03

    1.22

    no

    started at 1.3 mm

    41-45

    3C279

    0.1

    out

    out

    no

    started at 0.3 mm (focusing Ar2 for beam map)

    49-53

    3C279

    out

    1.01

    1.21

    no

    started at 1.3 mm, Ar2 FWHM only

    70-74

    1757-240

    out

    0.94

    1.15

    no

    started at 1.5 mm

    80-84

    1757-240

    out

    1.3

    1.55

    no

    started at 2.2 mm, Ar1 FWHM only

    91-95

    2251+158

    0.40

    1.41

    1.73

    yes

    started at 1.3mm

    114-118

    Neptune

    out

    out

    1.0

    yes

    started at 1.6 mm -> re-do

    119-123

    Neptune

    out

    0.76

    0.95

    yes

    started at 1.0 mm

    167-171

    Uranus

    out

    0.78

    1.15

    no

    started at 0.76mm

Similarly, if any beam maps (total power or polarimetry) are taken:

  • Beam maps

    Scan Nr

    Target

    Focus

    TP (99 subscans) or Pol (95 subscans)

    Notes

    20260118s38

    3C279

    1.03 (Ar1)

    TP (99)

    Focus optimized for Ar1 (i.e. standard choice in the S25 and W25 semesters)

    40

    3C279

    1.22 (Ar3)

    TP (99)

    Focus optimized for Ar3 [Ar1 Box I is KO]

    47

    3C279

    0.10 (Ar2)

    TP (99)

    Focus optimized for Ar2

Tuesday, 13th January 2026

We start the new week!

9:30-14:30 UT: Maintenance time. The team arrived at the telescope, only Andrea is missing.

14:30-00:00 UT: Stopped due to high wind, fog and snow. In the afternoon we had a training session on NIKA2 observations with on-site observers.

Wednesday, 14th January 2026

00:00-9:00 UT: Still stopped. Snowing in the morning.

09:00-13:00 UT still stopped for wind and thick clouds

12:30-14:15 UT: Sky clears up a bit so we start with EMIR backup observations of project 150-25 at ~13:00 UT. This is the only project available for observations right now, even if it <15 deg away from the Sun, keeping in mind that E150 is not working. Anyway, after 1 hr the weather is getting bad again (pwv >= 10mm) and we park the telescope once more.

14:15-20:00 UT: Telescope stopped. Bad weather.

20:00-04:00 UT: Telescope parked. No night operator until tomorrow due to personal reasons.

A shy Sun is trying to melt the clouds

Thursday, 15th January 2026

03:45-09:00 UT Stefano:

  • @03:45 we start the NIKA2 total power observations; lost KIDs: 20/7/24; tau(225)=0.27; temperature -8 C; wind 2 m/s. Stability: peak to peak sky variation along the timelines < +/- 0.5 Jy/beam on pointing scans @2mm.

  • 197-25 four repetitions of CL3. Note: the first three repetitions were taken with 47 Hz sampling. No big deal: actually they'll be less affected by sky "instabilities".
  • 166-25 one repetition of GC1. Lots of haze in the l.o.s. in the second scan. We do not observe 166-25 any further.

09:00-15:00 UT Ruben and Cheng (+ Stefano and Ioannis):

  • calibrations: MWC349 (scan 58), NGC7027 (scan 59), CRL 2688 (scan 60), Skydip (scan 61)
  • 166-25 one repetition on GC3.
  • @11:15 UT we switch to polarimetry. Lost KIDs 12/6/20.
  • 140-25 one repetition on Cloud D, using 2251+158 (3C454) as IP calibrator
  • @13:40 the imbf of scan 92 is not being produced by the new make-imbf. We do not stop/restart it, so that the people in charge of it can directly see "live" what is happening. Meanwhile we use the old make-imbf. If in half an hour is not back, SB will stop/restart it. 15 minutes lost waiting fro the old make-imbf to produce the pointing (scan 92) file. @14:00 UT Jean confirms that he has seen that there is a problem and Stefano restarts the new mak-imbf. Back to normal.
  • 140-25 one repetition of Cloud G, using 2251+158 (3C454) and Neptune as IP calibrators

@11:00 UT Andrea arrives at the telescope, safe and sound.

15:00-21:00 UT Paul:

  • Finishing 140-25 with pointing and calib_1scan with 2251+158 (3C454) and Neptune
  • Move to project 170-25 staying on Polarimetry.
  • Pointing , focus using Neptune (15:11 UT)
  • Thick fog arriving at 15:33 UT time.
  • Stability is very poor +/- 50 Jy/beam and moving the telescope to parking position...

Uhm... ARGH! Not again!

@16:00 UT little experiment, taking advantage of the poor weather:

  1. scan 113: normal pointing on 0316+413
  2. scan 114: gently knock on the cryostat with the handle of a screwdriver, at 1-2 Hz frequency
  3. scan 115: gently knock on the cryostat with the handle of a screwdriver, at 5-10 Hz frequency
  4. scan 116: caressing/sweeping the cryostat with the handle of a screwdriver
  5. scan 117: inserting the handle of the screwdriver between the cryostat and the ladder, such that they touch
  6. scan 118: same as 4., but dancing with pretty NIKA (2!)

None of these reproduced what we have experienced last week

21:00-03:00 UT Andrea:

  • Bad weather. High opacity, fog and snow. Telescope stopped.

Friday, 16th January 2026

03:45-09:00 UT Stefano:

  • Still stopped. Wind, snow and frozen rain in the morning.

09:00-15:00 UT Ruben and Cheng:

  • Still stopped: Wind, snow and frozen rain.

15:00-21:00 UT Paul:

  • Still stopped: snow and wind.
  • @15:30 UT the AoD moves to Granada and will continue his work remotely.
  • @17:00 UT The taumeter is frozen and marks low.
  • @19:00 UT the operator cleans the taumeter

21:00-03:00 UT Andrea:

  • Still stopped. Wind and frozen rain.

Saturday, 17th January 2026

03:45-09:00 UT Stefano:

  • Still stopped. Wind and frozen rain.
  • @07:00 UT the sky is clear. There is ice on the lower part of the primary dish, and ice stalagmites on the sub-reflector. The de-icing is on, but we have to wait for the Sun to help melting the ice.
  • @07:30 UT the operator cleans the taumeter

09:00-15:00 UT Ruben and Chen (+ Stefano):

  • @10:30 UT we start with TP, Lost KIDs 12/7/14 WOW; outside temperature -10 C, no wind.
  • the beam/focus is still quite affected by the de-icing (stopped 1h ago), hence low-priority TP first
  • 166-25 one rep of GC2
  • @11:45 UT we switch to polarimetry, it takes 3 attempts and a reboot of the mmpsync server to make things work; lost KIDs: 15/6/17.
  • 140-25 0.25 repetitions of CloudG. Paul realizes that the coordinates of CloudG in the catalog are wrong and different from those in the proposal. We delete the next 3 scans from the queue and put CloudG on hold until a change of coords is approved. We switch to CloudE.
  • 140-25 two repetitions of CloudE.
  • @15:00 UT we stop the telescope because we're in the clouds. Just in time.

Good morning! View from the neighbors The two telescopes look at each other (more or less)

15:00-19:30 UT: Paul:

  • Restarting at 16:00 UT and cont. on polarimetry project 170-25
  • 170-25 two reps of Tycho

19:30-03:00 UT Andrea:

  • quick training with Stefano
  • outside temperature dropped to -12 C, the focus changed a lot
  • 015-17 observations, using Uranus as IP calibrator, until it is available and then 3C286
  • 015-17 two reps of NGC1333S
  • two reps of NGC2024S3
  • started one rep of NGC2264D, that will continue in the next shift (see below)

NOTE a posteriori by Stefano and Andrea (2026/01/18): the new make-imbf did not produce the imbf of several 015-17 scans, for example 20260117s110, while the old make-imbf did.

Sunday, 18th January 2026

03:00-09:00 UT Stefano:

  • I let the current scan of 015-17 NGC2264D finish (1/3) and I delete the next two from the queue because El<~30. I then complete the 015-17 session with calib_1scan on 3C286 and 3C279 (different El).

  • @03:45 UT switch to total power. Lost KIDs 14/8/27.
  • 3 beam maps on 3C279, focused on Ar1 (scan 38), Ar3 (scan 39) and Ar2 (scan 47), respectively.
  • the new make-imbf "gets stuck" on the beam maps again: it does not produce them and does not produce the next scans (pointing/focus) either. Therefore, I produce the imbf of pointings manually. Then I restart the proper make-imbf (new) after waiting 34 minutes after the end of the first beam map (i.e., I restart it after the end of the second beam map). Remarkably, the imbf's of thethird beam maps are produced regularly.
  • during the 2nd beam map, box I (Ar1) is dead. I hope that during the whole 1st beam map it was OK. I check scan 39 (pointing after the 1st beam map): box I was OK. Fiuuu. A simple reboot of the DAQ is sufficient to bring it back to life. Lost KIDs 10/10/19.
  • skydip (scan 48). Usual alarms at sub-scans 9-10-11.
  • 197-25 two reps of Cl3
  • 166-25 started one rep on GC2 with alternative tilt angles

09:00-15:00 UT Ruben and Chen (+ Stefano):

  • 166-25 completed the rep on GC2
  • the new make-imbf got stuck on scan 78 (last scan produced 76; scan 77 was cancelled; scan 78 was not produced)
  • 166-25 one rep on GC3 (standard tilt)
  • @10:40 we switch to polarimetry. Lost KIDs: 10/8/18.
  • 140-25 0.75 reps on CloudE (we avoid the 4th scan because of clouds)
  • Clouds everywhere excpet in the N direction -> we try 170-25 that is in that region.

  • 170-25 the clouds arrived also to the N side. A pointing shows p2p of +/- 40 Jy/beam @2mm.
  • @12:40 UT therefore we stop for a while to see how the situation evolves.

15:00-21:00 UT: Paul (+ Stefano):

  • @15:30 UT we give it a try, pointing Neptune. Peak to peak sky variation along the timelines +/- 3 to 5 Jy/beam @2mm in this direction. The sky is slowly clearing up.
    • We prepare the focus and see if it becomes stable enough for observations. The taumeter is spiky because there are low clouds in its direction. On the other hand at high El and especially in the N direction, the sky is clear. "tau" at this point in only a number. We proceed.
  • 170-25 two reps of Tycho, with IP calibrators Neptune, 3C454 (2251+158) and Uranus.
  • @18:58 UT we switch to total power. Lost KIDs: 14/7/16.
  • some calibrations: Uranus (scan 146), Neptune (scan 149), Betelgeuse (scan 152)
  • very stable focus
  • 110-25 one rep of S284-2

21:00-03:00 Andrea:

  • Kept project 110-25. Done focus on Uranus. Good focus.
  • Third rep of S284-2.
  • skydip @23:39 ut in the pool account
  • Total power to polarization @01:10 ut
  • go to Uranus point and focus, out of the pool project.
  • Start with B-FUN (015-17)
  • calib1scan on Uranus (El > 30)

  • 1 rep on ngc2024S3

Monday, 19th January 2026

03:00-09:00 UT Stefano:

  • ...

09:00-15:00 UT Ruben and Chen:

  • ...

15:00-21:00 UT: Paul:

  • ...

21:00-03:00 Andrea:

  • ...

Tuesday, 20th January 2026

03:00-09:30 UT Stefano:

  • ...

End of the pool week.

DailyReportsNika2Pool130126 (last edited 2026-01-20 07:56:21 by NikaBolometer)