Differences between revisions 9 and 10
Revision 9 as of 2020-01-14 19:08:18
Size: 1172
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2020-01-14 19:09:24
Size: 1182
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 14: Line 14:
 * Calibrators MWC349, NGC7027, CRL2688. Fluxes look OK.  * Secondary calibrators MWC349, NGC7027, CRL2688. Fluxes look OK.

Back to the NIKA2 main page

Daily Reports

Bilal, Charlene, Caroline, Iacopo, Florian, Stefano, Carsten arrive at the 30m. Full house.

Jan 14, Tuesday

  • Laser used to check alignment between elevation axis and cryostat window. Strangely enough this seems to depend slightly on elevation. Small correction applied to M5 by SN.
  • Starting at 14:30 UT. High overcast of ice clouds.
  • Pointing session with ~33 sources. Pointing offsets look OK. JP fits model. Fit of Nasmyth offsets leads to a very slight improvement from 1.9" rms to 1.7" rms. Not yet implemented. Beam widths look OK.
  • Secondary calibrators MWC349, NGC7027, CRL2688. Fluxes look OK.
  • Skydip
  • Beam map on Uranus at 50deg Elevation.
  • Central pixel lost. Hole in the 2mm array. Re-do tuning. Re-do pointing, focus, 2 beam maps to create new kidpars after 1mm sweep done last week.
  • tau225~0.1. Ready to go. It would be helpful to have beam maps IMBfits be created separately from pointing and focus scans.
  • 18:10 Finally, after 3.5 hours, starting with science: LPSZ. New pointing model implemented in-between scans.

DailyReportsNika2Pool130120 (last edited 2020-01-20 18:28:37 by CarstenKramer)