Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2021-09-07 12:03:58
Size: 2199
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2021-09-07 12:04:34
Size: 2205
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 14: Line 14:
Line 15: Line 16:
Line 20: Line 22:

Back to the NIKA2 main page

Daily Report

NIKA2 tests in a technical time (T07) slot for (i) checking noise traces of array 2 and (ii) test its behaviour on the sky after correlated noise issues of past weeks. Observing in remote mode. Times referred to LT.

July 9th, Friday

17h00m - 21h00; Ángel: Opacity (tau[225 GHz]) above 0.7 at the beginning, going down to ~0.4 at the end of the shift. Unstable in general. First pointing and focus on Mars (low altitude). Broad/distorted beams (>21" at 2mm) until ~19h. More decent focus corrections and even a bit broadened beams widths after that. Several pointing/bright sources of NIKA2 Pool catalogues observed in previous semesters under opacity conditions quite similar to the predicted ones for that date were chosen, in order to compare rms statistics. In particular, PCCS2G208.07 and M82 fields observed in W2020 and S2019, respectively, were observed during this technical time slot. PCCS2G208.07 is a Planck compact source of the newIRAM_NIKA2_1mm catalogue prepared by Bilal long ago, addressed to densify the pointing (and possibly, flux calibration) source catalogue for the instrument user community. It’s an AGN classified as a blazar, with reported variability at least since 2016 (it can be noted in our frames too). The second one is a known nearby starburst galaxy. The rms estimation given in the top of the plots below was obtained from the statistics on a pseudo-annular background polygon limited by 60% and 80% KIDs coverage isocontours in each case, for comparison purposes. For a given source, exposure time and map geometry is the same for each epoch. It seems clear that array 2 is in good shape (as with maps at 1.15 mm):

attachment:targets_T07_20210709.png

Just at the end of this observing shift, we obtained some timelines and noise traces for each array with the window open and after close it. As shown below, traces seem to be again as expected:

attachment:traces_arr2_20210709.png

DailyReportsNika2Pool090721 (last edited 2021-09-13 13:54:39 by NikaBolometer)