Differences between revisions 81 and 82
⇤ ← Revision 81 as of 2026-10-08 03:27:19 →
Size: 9441
Comment:
← Revision 82 as of 2026-10-08 03:43:05 → ⇥
Size: 9789
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 34: Line 34:
 || 20261008s40-44 || || 1.47 mm || 1.09 mm || 1.08 mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A1 value. Using peak values||
 || 20261008s45-49 || || 1. mm || 1. mm || 1. mm || no || with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A2 value. Using peak values||
Line 145: Line 147:
   Remarks: the focus offset difference between A1/3 and A2 is about 0.3. However, the A2 FWHM is alway >21" and the beam is elongated. The shape is not the same as the one we use to have. Issue with the current DAFs? The dichroic? Lateral focus (but this should also affect A1/3)?    Remarks: the focus offset difference between A1/3 and A2 is about 0.3. However, the A2 (FWHM_x x FWHM_y)^1/2 is alway >21" and the beam is elongated: at best we have ~20"x25". The shape is not the same as the one we use to have. Issue with the current DAFs? The dichroic? Lateral focus (but this should also affect A1/3)? Other?

Back to the NIKA2 main page

Daily Reports (2026/10/6-13, NIKA2 run 81, Cryo run 93)

Observers on-site: Rémi, Giorgos, Mairi, Miren

AoD: Ioannis

Operators: Pedro, Sergio

Please fill the Table with the Ar1,2,3 focus values as follows. At best, make one table per day.

  • Focus sequences

    Scan nr

    Target

    Ar2

    Ar1

    Ar3

    Polarized?

    Notes

    20261007s25-29

    Mars

    1.85 mm

    1.71 mm

    1.70 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s33-37

    Mars

    1.76 mm

    1.63 mm

    1.59 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s43-47

    1156+295

    2 mm

    1.75 mm

    1.75 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s48-52

    1156+295

    2.2 mm

    1.75 mm

    1.8 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s53-57

    1156+295

    2.05 mm

    1.78 mm

    1.8 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s58-62

    1156+295

    2.3 mm

    1.85 mm

    1.83 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s65-69

    1641+399

    2.35 mm

    1.7 mm

    1.74 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s70-74

    1641+399

    1.9 mm

    1.75 mm

    1.75 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s75-79

    1641+399

    1.9 mm

    1.69 mm

    1.71 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261007s80-84

    1641+399

    2.22 mm

    1.93 mm

    1.96 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs, with the original focus script (0.4 mm steps)

    20261007s97-101

    1641+399

    2mm

    1.5mm

    1.52mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs, with the original focus script (0.4 mm steps), a2 not well constrained

    20261007s162-166

    2200+420

    1.05 mm

    0.7 mm

    0.71 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    Focus sequences

    Scan nr

    Target

    Ar2

    Ar1

    Ar3

    Polarized?

    Notes

    20261008s1-5

    1.36 mm

    1.09 mm

    1.09 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs

    20261008s11-15

    1.55 mm

    1.09 mm

    1.10 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A1 value. Not great at 2mm. Using peak values

    20261008s16-20

    1.55 mm

    1.18 mm

    1.18 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A2 value. Using peak values

    20261008s25-29

    1.51 mm

    1.09 mm

    1.11 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A1 value. Using peak values

    20261008s31-35

    1.41 mm

    1.14 mm

    1.14 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A2 value. Using peak values

    20261008s40-44

    1.47 mm

    1.09 mm

    1.08 mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A1 value. Using peak values

    20261008s45-49

    1. mm

    1. mm

    1. mm

    no

    with run92.ini and old DAFs. Starting on A2 value. Using peak values

Similarly, if any beam maps (total power) are taken:

  • Beam maps (99 sub-scans)

    Scan Nr

    Target

    Focus

    Notes

    20261007s30

    Mars

    1.71 mm (Ar1)

    run93, new sweep

    20261007s39

    Mars

    1.63 mm (Ar1)

    run93, new sweep

    20261007s181

    0316+413

    0.8 mm (Ar1)

    run93, new sweep

    20261008s8

    0316+413

    1.1 mm (Ar1)

    run93, new sweep

    20261008s23

    Uranus

    1.18 mm (Ar1)

    run93, new sweep

    20261008s38

    Uranus

    1.14 mm (Ar1)

    run93, new sweep

Please keep track of sweep changes: it makes our life easier when building the DAFs/Kidpars.

  • Changes of sweep

    Sweep

    Scan Nr

    Time

    Notes

    OLD

    up to 20261007s29

    for pointing & focus

    NEW

    20261007s30

    beammap

    OLD

    20261007s31-38

    for pointing & focus

    NEW

    20261007s39

    beammap

    OLD

    20261007s42-

    for pointing & focus

    NEW

    20261007s180-

    beammap

    OLD

    20261007s182

    for pointing & focus

    NEW

    20261008s7-

    beammap

    OLD

    20261008s9

    for pointing & focus

    NEW

    20261008s22-

    beammap

    OLD

    20261008s24

    for pointing & focus

    NEW

    20261008s37-

    beammap

    OLD

    20261008s39

    for pointing & focus

Pool-Account usage: Accounting of observing times

  • Calibration observations like pointing, focus, and calib_1scan (the latter in case of NIKA2-Pol only, aimed at characterizing the instrumental polarization) which are conducted before and during project observations are part of the project time. Note that all proposals include such overheads in the time and sensitivity estimates. This holds for total power and polarimetry observations.

  • Other calibration observations which are important for all projects like beam maps, skydips, or calib_1scan for absolute flux calibration may be accounted under the pool account (nikaX-YY, where X = s,w and YY = year).

  • When conditions are unstable and it is unclear whether project observations make sense at all, calibrations may be accounted to the pool account.

October 6th, 2026, Tuesday

10:30-15:30 : 3/4 observers arrived at the telescope. Rémi planned to arrive later today. Weather horrible. Maintenance ongoing.

Antenna parked all day, clouds, wind, and rain.

October 7th, 2026, Wednesday

07:00LT: pointing and focus tests with old sweep (run92). Difference between Ar2 and Ar1 ~0.35 mm. Difference between Ar3 and Ar1 practically 0.

10:00 - 11:30LT: new sweep by M. Calvo. We now have new run93.ini files.

11:45LT: starting NIKA2 observations to get beammaps for the new sweep. Back to run92 for pointing and focus on Mars. DAQ started, lost KIDs Ar1/Ar2/Ar3: 129/6/14; traces look fine. Opacity between 0.3 - 0.5. Peak-to-peak in Ar2 +/- 4-5 Jy/beam. Focus differences: Ar1 - Ar2 = -0.14 mm, Ar1 - Ar3 = 0.01 mm.

12:45LT: moving to run93 for beammaps. Lost KIDs Ar1/Ar2/Ar3: 21/8/30. To be understood if box I is lost or not. Beammap (20261007s30) focused on Ar1.

13h25LT: back to run92 for pointing and focus before another beammap. Lost KIDs Ar1/Ar2/Ar3: 140/7/15. Moving back to run93 for beammaps. Beammap (20261007s39) focused on Ar1.

14h30LT: focus tests with run92. Using the original focus script (with 0.4 mm step) starting from scan 20261007s80.

16h55LT: we try a mini pointing session making use of the sources in the PCCS catalogue provided by S. Berta (we have had to remove the "G" from the names in the end... 13 characters otherwise...) Opacity is ~ 0.35 (tau225 GHz), but a lot of clouds. We can not point, p2p fluctuations @Ar2 of +/- 20 Jy/beam.

19h00LT: We resume. Sky is stable (<5 Jy/beam) and tau around 0.3.

Summary:

Scan

Source

Azimuth

Elevation

tau_225GHz

Azimuth Corr.

Elevation Corr.

91

034.61+11.84

164

59

0.3

-5

-5

92

039.53+28.08

202

69

0.28

-3

-6

94

022.98+42.17

232

53

0.28

-3

-7

96

1641+399

285

71

0.28

-5

-8

104

039.28+62.77

274

43

0.26

-2.5

-7

109

1641+399

287

60

0.28

-4.5

-9

141

071.50+55.61

305

28

0.24

-2

-4.2

143

133.77+42.32

351

21

0.26

-0.5

-5

145

141.27+25.05

372

24

0.27

0

-2

147

W3OH

396

41

0.26

-2.8

-4.2

154

121.67-05.69

400

57

0.26

-6

-4

157

112.91-09.88

401

68

0.26

-6.5

-3

159

098.48-15.81

402

84

0.27

-8.7

-1

161

2200+420

307

81

0.24

-3

-4.3

Average

??

??

??

SD

??

??

??

October 8th, 2026, Thursday

00:30LT Stable (=/-2 Jy/beam) and good opacity (~ 0.25). Better beammaps are needed. We move to 0316+413 for first beammaps, waiting Uranus to be high.

1am --> 7am (Rémi): stable weather and opacity ~ 0.25 for the entire shift.

  • 2 beam maps on 0316+413 with focus and pointing optimized for A1, plus several pointing and focus
  • 2 beam maps on Uranus with focus and pointing optimized for A1, plus several pointing and focus
  • 1 beam maps on Uranus with focus and pointing optimized for A2, plus several pointing and focus

    Remarks: the focus offset difference between A1/3 and A2 is about 0.3. However, the A2 (FWHM_x x FWHM_y)^1/2 is alway >21" and the beam is elongated: at best we have ~20"x25". The shape is not the same as the one we use to have. Issue with the current DAFs? The dichroic? Lateral focus (but this should also affect A1/3)? Other?

October 9th, 2026, Friday

October 10th, 2026, Saturday

October 11th, 2026, Sunday

October 12th, 2026, Monday

October 13th, 2026, Tuesday

DailyReportsNika2Pool061026 (last edited 2026-10-16 09:30:57 by NikaBolometer)