|
Size: 168
Comment:
|
Size: 2027
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| Tests performed during the heavy maintenance. | Tests performed during the heavy maintenance (2007.06.20) [[TableOfContents]] === Goals === Identify the origin(s) of the "acceleration" problem in MAMBO2. We want to answer the following questions: * Is the acceleration problem due to a mechanical or electrical process ? * What is the influence of the driving program on its intensity (Basic/Cascade) ? |
| Line 4: | Line 12: |
| Goals: Identify the origin(s) of the "acceleration" problem in MAMBO2 [[BR]] People: DJ, SL, SN, JP |
=== People === Pico Veleta: DJ, SL, SN, JP |
| Line 9: | Line 19: |
| Methods | === Methods === * Inclinometer installed on the Mambo2 platform attachment:inclinometerPhoto.jpg ---------- * On-off measurements on an absorber. The on-off are done w/o the wobbler taking offset in azimuth and elevation to activate the Basic or Cascade controller. The Basic/Cascade limits are (600,400) arcsec in (Azimuth,Elevation). The Basic controller has a smoother behavior than the Cascade controller. * An extra weight is added on the bolometer platform to check the effects of a change in the platform response to the vibration. * Oscilloscope monitoring directly on Mambo2 are performed during an on-off measurements, === Results === * Inclinometer measurements for two on-off measurements with the Cascade and the Basic controller. [[BR]] attachment:inclinometerBolo.jpg * On-off measurements with the offsets in elevation: 360" (scan 47, Cascade) and 440" (scan 50, Basic) [[BR]] '''Cascade controller''' attachment:scan47-elev-cascade.jpg --------- '''Basic controller''' attachment:scan50-elev-basic.jpg --------- * An extra weight was put on the bolometer platform (scan 51) attachment:scan51.jpg --------- * Measurements of electrical peak with the oscilloscope during an on-off measurements with the offsets in elevation (scan 53). No correlation was found between the beginning of the scans where the extra noise peaks appeared and the electric activity. A peak frequency of 5 sec was observed but which may be related to the air conditioned system. === Conclusions === |
Tests performed during the heavy maintenance (2007.06.20)
Goals
Identify the origin(s) of the "acceleration" problem in MAMBO2. We want to answer the following questions:
- Is the acceleration problem due to a mechanical or electrical process ?
- What is the influence of the driving program on its intensity (Basic/Cascade) ?
People
Pico Veleta: DJ, SL, SN, JP
Methods
- Inclinometer installed on the Mambo2 platform
attachment:inclinometerPhoto.jpg
- On-off measurements on an absorber. The on-off are done w/o the wobbler taking offset in azimuth and elevation to activate the Basic or Cascade controller. The Basic/Cascade limits are (600,400) arcsec in (Azimuth,Elevation). The Basic controller has a smoother behavior than the Cascade controller.
- An extra weight is added on the bolometer platform to check the effects of
a change in the platform response to the vibration.
- Oscilloscope monitoring directly on Mambo2 are performed during an
on-off measurements,
Results
- Inclinometer measurements for two on-off measurements with the Cascade and the Basic controller.
BR attachment:inclinometerBolo.jpg
- On-off measurements with the offsets in elevation: 360" (scan 47, Cascade) and 440" (scan 50, Basic)
BR Cascade controller attachment:scan47-elev-cascade.jpg
Basic controller attachment:scan50-elev-basic.jpg
- An extra weight was put on the bolometer platform (scan 51)
attachment:scan51.jpg
- Measurements of electrical peak with the oscilloscope during an on-off measurements with the offsets in elevation (scan 53).
No correlation was found between the beginning of the scans where the extra noise peaks appeared and the electric activity. A peak frequency of 5 sec was observed but which may be related to the air conditioned system.