|
Size: 3046
Comment:
|
Size: 4474
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 37: | Line 37: |
| == Beam maps analysis == We have a new Ar3 and we need to characterize its geometry and its flat field. To this aim, on 2026/03/24 we took two beam maps focused on Ar1 (scans 20260324s169 and 177). The idea and hope is that the focus of Ar3 is roughly the same of that of Ar1, thanks to the March 10 intervention, and these beam maps will be good for our purpose. We reduce the beam maps during the night between 2026/03/24 and 25. <<BR>> Ar2 is out of focus and in order to be able to reduce it, we need to relax completely the constraints on its beam size and shape. <<BR>> Ar1 is well on focus. The best beam map is 177. The other (169) has some problems at the lower edge for unknown reasons. <<BR>> The Ar3 focus is decent. The array is missing Box S, as already known, and also several KIDs in Boxes M, N O (supposedly). Below here you can see the geometry of the three Arrays as derived from the average of these two beam maps. [[attachment:ar2run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|{{attachment:ar2run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|Ar2 beam maps 169 ans 177|height=300}}|target="_blank"]] [[attachment:ar1run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|{{attachment:ar1run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|Ar1 beam maps 169 ans 177|height=300}}|target="_blank"]] [[attachment:ar3run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|{{attachment:ar3run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|Ar3 beam maps 169 ans 177|height=300}}|target="_blank"]] |
|
| Line 44: | Line 58: |
Back to the NIKA2 Run 80 main page
Run80 data processing
Here we include the preliminary data reduction results of the re-commissioning NIKA2 run 80, as obtained at the telescope during this week (2026/03/24-31).
Focus difference between the three arrays
As of 2026/03/25 @01:25 UT.
The focus difference Ar1-Ar2 is roughly +1.00 mm.
The focus difference Ar3-Ar1 is roughly -0.05 mm.
Focus sequences
Scan nr
Target
Ar2
Ar1
Ar3
Polarized?
Notes
20260324s153-157
Uranus
0.27
1.25
1.2
no
Started at 1.0 mm; tadadada; Ar2 good fit; Ar1 and Ar3 fit is marginal
158-162
Uranus
out
1.3
1.25
no
Started at 1.5 mm; Ar1 perfect fit; Ar2 out of range
163-167
Uranus
0.28
out
out
no
Started at 0.5 mm; Ar2 perfect fit; Ar1 out of range
171-175
Uranus
out
1.22
1.18
no
started at 1.5 mm; Ar1 perfect fit; Ar2 out of range
206-210
0851+202
out
1.36
1.31
no
Started at 1.4 mm; Ar1 and Ar3 perfect fit; Ar2 out of range
Beam maps analysis
We have a new Ar3 and we need to characterize its geometry and its flat field. To this aim, on 2026/03/24 we took two beam maps focused on Ar1 (scans 20260324s169 and 177). The idea and hope is that the focus of Ar3 is roughly the same of that of Ar1, thanks to the March 10 intervention, and these beam maps will be good for our purpose.
We reduce the beam maps during the night between 2026/03/24 and 25.
Ar2 is out of focus and in order to be able to reduce it, we need to relax completely the constraints on its beam size and shape.
Ar1 is well on focus. The best beam map is 177. The other (169) has some problems at the lower edge for unknown reasons.
The Ar3 focus is decent. The array is missing Box S, as already known, and also several KIDs in Boxes M, N O (supposedly).
Below here you can see the geometry of the three Arrays as derived from the average of these two beam maps.
