|
Size: 3046
Comment:
|
Size: 6358
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 37: | Line 37: |
| == Beam maps analysis == We have a new Ar3 and we need to characterize its geometry and its flat field. To this aim, on 2026/03/24 we took two beam maps focused on Ar1 (scans 20260324s169 and 177). The idea and hope is that the focus of Ar3 is roughly the same of that of Ar1, thanks to the March 10 intervention, and these beam maps will be good for our purpose. We reduce the beam maps during the night between 2026/03/24 and 25. <<BR>> Ar2 is out of focus and in order to be able to reduce it, we need to relax completely the constraints on its beam size and shape. <<BR>> Ar1 is well on focus. The best beam map is 177. The other (169) has some problems at the lower edge for unknown reasons. <<BR>> The Ar3 focus is decent. The array is missing Box S, as already known, and also several KIDs in Boxes M, N O (supposedly). Below here you can see the geometry of the three Arrays as derived from the average of these two beam maps. [[attachment:ar2run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|{{attachment:ar2run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|Ar2 beam maps 169 and 177|height=400}}|target="_blank"]] [[attachment:ar1run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|{{attachment:ar1run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|Ar1 beam maps 169 and 177|height=400}}|target="_blank"]] [[attachment:ar3run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|{{attachment:ar3run80_yynn_1_0_2_beamsAvMedAll.jpg|Ar3 beam maps 169 and 177|height=400}}|target="_blank"]] == Study of the Ar1 and Ar2 beams at different focus values == On 2026/03/25, we carried out a series of calib_1scan with different focus values, starting from the Ar1 optimal focus to the Ar2 optimal focus, in steps of 0.2 mm. The aim was to study the change of MB flux (because the CAL is based on main beams), % of flux in the side lobes of the beam, and FWHM of the minor/major axes of the beam, as a function of focus (distance from the optimal position). Below here you find a table that summarizes our measurements and a series of plots produced by the PIIC monitors for Ar1 and Ar2. |
|
| Line 40: | Line 58: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||| Study of side lobes (TP, point-like) || |||||||||| General |||||||| Ar1 |||||||||| Ar2 || || Scan nr || El. [deg] || Target || Z Focus [mm] || Notes || MB flux [mJy] || Side lobes % || FWHM min [arcsec] || FWHM max [arcsec] || MB flux [mJy] || Side lobes % || FWHM min [arcsec] || FWHM max [arcsec] || || 243 || 48.8 || 3C273 || 1.35 || Ar1 focus || 4.85 || 7.4% || 11.40 || 11.86 || 6.96 || 8.5% || 17.72 || 20.47 || || 245 || 50.1 || 3C273 || 1.15 || Ar1-0.2 mm || 4.32 || 9.5% || 11.43 || 12.84 || 7.19 || 7.7% || 17.54 || 19.49 || || 247 || 51.8 || 3C273 || 0.95 || Ar1-0.4 mm || 4.07 || 11.2% || 11.61 || 13.06 || 7.21 || 7.8% || 17.24 || 19.60 || || 249 || 52.9 || 3C273 || 0.75 || Ar1-0.6 mm || 3.77 || 16.0% || 12.44 || 15.67 || 7.51 || 7.2% || 17.19 || 18.84 || || 251 || 53.7 || 3C273 || 0.55 || Ar1-0.8 mm || 3.62 || 19.8% || 14.78 || 21.86 || 7.47 || 7.3% || 17.34 || 18.56 || || 253 || 54.3 || 3C273 || 0.35 || +/- Ar2 focus || 3.64 || 28.1% || 17.40 || 29.17 || 7.34 || 8.0% || 17.59 || 18.59 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |||||||||||||||||||||||||| NOTE: the focus values listed here do already include the -0.2 adjustment for the curved focal surfaces || |
Back to the NIKA2 Run 80 main page
Contents
Run80 data processing
Here we include the preliminary data reduction results of the re-commissioning NIKA2 run 80, as obtained at the telescope during this week (2026/03/24-31).
Focus difference between the three arrays
As of 2026/03/25 @01:25 UT.
The focus difference Ar1-Ar2 is roughly +1.00 mm.
The focus difference Ar3-Ar1 is roughly -0.05 mm.
Focus sequences
Scan nr
Target
Ar2
Ar1
Ar3
Polarized?
Notes
20260324s153-157
Uranus
0.27
1.25
1.2
no
Started at 1.0 mm; tadadada; Ar2 good fit; Ar1 and Ar3 fit is marginal
158-162
Uranus
out
1.3
1.25
no
Started at 1.5 mm; Ar1 perfect fit; Ar2 out of range
163-167
Uranus
0.28
out
out
no
Started at 0.5 mm; Ar2 perfect fit; Ar1 out of range
171-175
Uranus
out
1.22
1.18
no
started at 1.5 mm; Ar1 perfect fit; Ar2 out of range
206-210
0851+202
out
1.36
1.31
no
Started at 1.4 mm; Ar1 and Ar3 perfect fit; Ar2 out of range
Beam maps analysis
We have a new Ar3 and we need to characterize its geometry and its flat field. To this aim, on 2026/03/24 we took two beam maps focused on Ar1 (scans 20260324s169 and 177). The idea and hope is that the focus of Ar3 is roughly the same of that of Ar1, thanks to the March 10 intervention, and these beam maps will be good for our purpose.
We reduce the beam maps during the night between 2026/03/24 and 25.
Ar2 is out of focus and in order to be able to reduce it, we need to relax completely the constraints on its beam size and shape.
Ar1 is well on focus. The best beam map is 177. The other (169) has some problems at the lower edge for unknown reasons.
The Ar3 focus is decent. The array is missing Box S, as already known, and also several KIDs in Boxes M, N O (supposedly).
Below here you can see the geometry of the three Arrays as derived from the average of these two beam maps.
Study of the Ar1 and Ar2 beams at different focus values
On 2026/03/25, we carried out a series of calib_1scan with different focus values, starting from the Ar1 optimal focus to the Ar2 optimal focus, in steps of 0.2 mm. The aim was to study the change of MB flux (because the CAL is based on main beams), % of flux in the side lobes of the beam, and FWHM of the minor/major axes of the beam, as a function of focus (distance from the optimal position). Below here you find a table that summarizes our measurements and a series of plots produced by the PIIC monitors for Ar1 and Ar2.
Study of side lobes (TP, point-like)
General
Ar1
Ar2
Scan nr
El. [deg]
Target
Z Focus [mm]
Notes
MB flux [mJy]
Side lobes %
FWHM min [arcsec]
FWHM max [arcsec]
MB flux [mJy]
Side lobes %
FWHM min [arcsec]
FWHM max [arcsec]
243
48.8
3C273
1.35
Ar1 focus
4.85
7.4%
11.40
11.86
6.96
8.5%
17.72
20.47
245
50.1
3C273
1.15
Ar1-0.2 mm
4.32
9.5%
11.43
12.84
7.19
7.7%
17.54
19.49
247
51.8
3C273
0.95
Ar1-0.4 mm
4.07
11.2%
11.61
13.06
7.21
7.8%
17.24
19.60
249
52.9
3C273
0.75
Ar1-0.6 mm
3.77
16.0%
12.44
15.67
7.51
7.2%
17.19
18.84
251
53.7
3C273
0.55
Ar1-0.8 mm
3.62
19.8%
14.78
21.86
7.47
7.3%
17.34
18.56
253
54.3
3C273
0.35
+/- Ar2 focus
3.64
28.1%
17.40
29.17
7.34
8.0%
17.59
18.59
NOTE: the focus values listed here do already include the -0.2 adjustment for the curved focal surfaces