|
Size: 1148
Comment:
|
Size: 1232
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 8: | Line 8: |
| == PIIC reduction of the 20250612s43 beam-map ++ SB @18:20 LT: The beam map is scan 20250612s43. Results of a quick analysis of the beam map: the quality of the beam map (sky, telescope, focus, etc.) is unfortunately not good enough for making new (preliminary) Ar1 and Ar3 DAFs. Below you see the classic FOV beam-map figure. Ar3 is much worse than Ar1 likely because the best focus difference that affects it. Nevertheless, also Ar1 is unusable. |
== PIIC reduction of the 20250612s43 beam-map == SB, 2025/06/12 @18:20 LT: The beam map is scan 20250612s43. Results of a quick analysis of the beam map: the quality of the beam map (sky, telescope, focus, etc.) is unfortunately not good enough for making new (preliminary) Ar1 and Ar3 DAFs. Below you see the classic FOV beam-map figure. Ar3 is much worse than Ar1 likely because the best focus difference that affects it. Nevertheless, also Ar1 is unusable. On the bright side: the central KID (Ar2) is definitely back! Yay! |
Back to the NIKA2 Run 73 main page
Contents
Processing of the June 2025 NIKA2 Re-Commissioning
PIIC reduction of the 20250612s43 beam-map
SB, 2025/06/12 @18:20 LT: The beam map is scan 20250612s43. Results of a quick analysis of the beam map: the quality of the beam map (sky, telescope, focus, etc.) is unfortunately not good enough for making new (preliminary) Ar1 and Ar3 DAFs. Below you see the classic FOV beam-map figure. Ar3 is much worse than Ar1 likely because the best focus difference that affects it. Nevertheless, also Ar1 is unusable.
On the bright side: the central KID (Ar2) is definitely back! Yay!
