Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2016-10-31 18:23:02
Size: 3977
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2016-10-31 18:23:30
Size: 3985
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 26: Line 26:
|| 200 || 18h17 || Neptune || Pointing b || 142.43 ||36.32 || 2.30 -2.50 0.00 0.00 -0.73 || 0.32 ||   || || We do the pointing again--> set pointing 1.6 -4.5 || || 200 || 18h17 || Neptune || Pointing b || 142.43 ||36.32 || 2.30 -2.50 0.00 0.00 -0.73 || 0.32 || 0.36 || 0.26 || We do the pointing again--> set pointing 1.6 -4.5 ||

NIKA2 run 6 31 October 2016

Back to list of day to day logbook of observations

2016-10-31

  • Quick description of the session: Find optimal foci in X and Y and then do beammaps

Observers: Juan + Florian -- Operator: Quique

Scan

UT

Source

Command

Az

El

Pointing X, Y, Focus

Tau225

Tau260

Tau150

Comment

165

16h09

G34.3

Track

175.99

54.11

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

0.19

We start a new session (Juan, Florian, operator: Quique). We begin this session by some dark tests.

166

16h18

G34.3

Pointing b

176.63

54.09

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

0.19

The pointing analysis went fine

167-168

16h24

G34.3

nkotf_square 4

179.84

54.14

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

0.39

Dark test to monitor the vibrations between subscans

169

16h28

G34.3

beammap1scan

181.32

54.09

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

0.45

Dark test to monitor the noise on a beammap

170

17h05

Neptune

track

125.68

26.35

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

0.38

We removed the window to be on the sky and now go on Neptune for a beammap sequence. !! Acquisition crashed !!

171

17h22

Neptune

track

128.96

28.77

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

0.39

Acquisition recovered --> we go on Neptune

172

17h23

Neptune

Pointing b

129.23

28.82

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

0.39

0.43

0.3

First we do a pointing --> set pointing -5.7 -1.1

173-177

17h27

Neptune

FocusOTF-Z 0

130.39

29.62

-5.70 -1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.39

Now we check the focus along the Z-axis direction --> set focus -0.5 --> It seems we are seriously out of focus so we do it again with this new correction

178-182

17h36

Neptune

FocusOTF-Z -0.5

132.14

30.77

-5.70 -1.10 0.00 0.00 -0.50

0.39

Check the focus along the Z-axis direction --> set focus -0.73

183-187

17h45

Neptune

FocusOTF-X 0.0

134.33

32.17

-5.70 -1.10 0.00 0.00 -0.73

0.33

Check the focus along the X-axis direction --> set focus 0.0 /dir X (best focus correction found using both the flux maximization and the error beam shape)

188-192

17h53

Neptune

FocusOTF-Y 0.0

136.16

33.18

-5.70 -1.10 0.00 0.00 -0.73

0.26

Check the focus along the Y-axis direction --> set focus 0.5 /dir Y

193-197

18h00

Neptune

FocusOTF-Y 0.5

137.95

34.21

-5.70 -1.10 0.00 0.50 -0.73

0.36

0.38

0.27

Check the focus along the Y-axis direction again--> set focus 0.0 /dir Y

198

18h12

Neptune

Pointing b

140.99

35.72

-5.70 -1.10 0.00 0.50 -0.73

0.32

We do a pointing again--> set pointing 2.3 -2.5

199

18h15

Neptune

Beammap1scan99sub a

142.10

36.10

2.30 -2.50 0.00 0.50 -0.73

0.32

Cancelled because the focus along the Y-axis is wrong

200

18h17

Neptune

Pointing b

142.43

36.32

2.30 -2.50 0.00 0.00 -0.73

0.32

0.36

0.26

We do the pointing again--> set pointing 1.6 -4.5

201

18h20

Neptune

Beammap1scan99sub a

143.21

36.70

1.60 -4.50 0.00 0.00 -0.73

0.41

First beammap of the session at optimal focus

NK2run6_20161031 (last edited 2016-11-01 09:18:49 by NikaBolometer)