Differences between revisions 4 and 6 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 4 as of 2016-10-28 18:55:00
Size: 4393
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2016-10-28 19:17:31
Size: 4598
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 28: Line 28:
|| 239 || 18h48 || Neptune || beammap1scan99sub || 148 || 39 || -2.5 -12.3 -0.32 0.27 -0.5 || 0.2 || We launch the beammap but we are not really happy with the beam shape... || || 239 || 18h48 || Neptune || beammap1scan99sub azimuth || 148 || 39 || -2.5 -12.3 -0.32 0.27 -0.5 || 0.2 || We launch the beammap but we are not really happy with the beam shape... ||
|| 240 || 19h17 || Neptune || beammap1scan99sub elevation || 156 || 41 || -2.5 -12.3 -0.32 0.27 -0.5 || 0.23 || orthogonal beammap ||

NIKA2 run 6 28 October 2016

Back to list of day to day logbook of observations

2016-10-28

  • Quick description of the session: first dark tests then beammaps

Observers: Juan + Florian -- Operator: Quique

Scan

UT

Source

Command

Az

El

Pointing X, Y, Focus

Tau225

Comment

199

16h20

G34.3

Track

179.8

19.2

0 0 0 0 0

0.3

We start a new session (Juan, Florian, operator: Quique). We decide to start by some dark tests

200

16h30

G34.3

nkpoint b

179.8

19.2

0 0 0 0 0

0.3

Dark test pointing

201

16h40

G34.3

beammap1scan

179.8

19.2

0 0 0 0 0

0.3

Dark test beammap

202

17h20

Neptune

track

129.56

29.16

0 0 0 0 0

0.3

Window open going on Neptune to start the pointing/focus/beammap session

203

17h35

Neptune

pointing b

129.56

29.16

0 0 0 0 0

0.3

First a pointing --> set pointing 1.4 -16.9 (really weird profiles, the reference pixels seems too far away from the center...)

204

17h40

Neptune

pointing b

129.56

29.16

1.4 -16.9 0 0 0

0.3

Check the pointing --> set pointing -1.4 -16.8

205-209

17h45

Neptune

focusOTF-Z 0

131

30

-1.4 -16.8 0 0 0

0.3

Now a focus along the Z-axis direction --> set focus -0.48

210-214

17h54

Neptune

focusOTF-X 0

133

31

-1.4 -16.8 0 0 -0.48

0.3

Now a focus along the X-axis direction --> set focus -0.33 /dir X

215-219

18h01

Neptune

focusOTF-Y 0

135

33

-1.4 -16.8 -0.33 0 -0.48

0.3

Now a focus along the Y-axis direction --> set focus 0.05 /dir Y

220

18h08

Neptune

pointing b

136.9

33.6

-1.4 -16.8 -0.33 0.05 -0.48

0.4

Final pointing before the beammap --> set pointing -4.1 -13.7

221-225

18h14

Neptune

focusOTF-Z -0.48

138

34

-4.1 -13.7 -0.33 0.05 -0.48

0.3

The pointing correction is large because the focus is still not good (elliptical beams) so we do a focus session again --> focus along the Z-axis direction --> set focus -0.5

226-230

18h22

Neptune

focusOTF-X -0.33

140

35

-4.1 -13.7 -0.33 0.05 -0.5

0.3

Focus along the X-axis direction --> set focus -0.32 /dir X

231

18h31

Neptune

pointing b

142

36

-4.1 -13.7 -0.32 0.05 -0.5

0.2

Pointing to check if the beams are better after a mirror checking --> set pointing 3.2 -16.5 (the beams are indeed much more symetric)

232-236

18h35

Neptune

focusOTF-Y -0.05

144

37

3.2 -16.5 -0.32 0.05 -0.5

0.2

Focus along the Y-axis direction --> set focus 0.27 /dir Y

237

18h42

Neptune

pointing b

145.6

37.7

3.2 -16.5 -0.32 0.27 -0.5

0.2

Final pointing before the beammap --> set pointing -2.1 -14.2

238

18h48

Neptune

pointing b

147

38

-2.1 -14.2 -0.32 0.27 -0.5

0.2

Check the pointing before the beammap --> set pointing -2.5 -12.3

239

18h48

Neptune

beammap1scan99sub azimuth

148

39

-2.5 -12.3 -0.32 0.27 -0.5

0.2

We launch the beammap but we are not really happy with the beam shape...

240

19h17

Neptune

beammap1scan99sub elevation

156

41

-2.5 -12.3 -0.32 0.27 -0.5

0.23

orthogonal beammap

NK2run6_20161028 (last edited 2016-10-29 15:58:42 by NikaBolometer)