Differences between revisions 8 and 9
Revision 8 as of 2016-10-27 18:13:28
Size: 1599
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2016-10-27 19:17:55
Size: 2223
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 17: Line 17:
|| 176-187 || || || || || || || || Do not consider, doing test to check problems of oscillations when doing a track |||| 176-187 || || 188 || 19h14|| Neptune || nkpoint b || 154 || 40 || DARK TEST no autotuning ||
|| 189 || 19h15|| Neptune || beam140scans || 154 || 40 || DARK TEST no autotuning, cancelled ||
|| 190 || 19h17|| Neptune || beam140scans || 154 || 40 || DARK TEST ||

NIKA2 run 6 26 October 2016

Back to list of day to day logbook of observations

2016-10-27

  • Quick description of the session: first dark tests then beammaps

Observers: Juan + Florian -- Operator: Quique

Scan

UT

Source

Command

Az

El

Pointing X, Y, Focus

Tau225

Comment

172

16h01

G34.3

Track

165.46

53.34

0 0 0 0

3.48

We start a new session (Juan, Florian, operator: Quique). We decide to start by some dark tests

173

16h08

G34.3

Pointing b

166.14

53.38

0 0 0 0

2.98

First a pointing --> The processing went well

174

16h12

G34.3

Beammap

174.73

54.11

0 0 0 0

1.81

We now do a beammap in azimuth in this dark test as we have not done such study in the previous sessions

175

16h36

G34.3

Beammap

181.09

54.27

0 0 0 0

0.73

Beammap in elevation. WARNING: the cryostat temperature increased to 215 mK so we lost the pixels.

176

17h56

G34.3

Pointing b

210.51

49.97

0 0 0 0

0.70

Martino managed to recover the nominal temperature so we launch a pointing to see the timeline behavior on trace

176-187

Do not consider, doing test to check problems of oscillations when doing a track

176-187

188

19h14

Neptune

nkpoint b

154

40

DARK TEST no autotuning

189

19h15

Neptune

beam140scans

154

40

DARK TEST no autotuning, cancelled

190

19h17

Neptune

beam140scans

154

40

DARK TEST

NK2run6_20161027 (last edited 2016-10-28 05:51:15 by NikaBolometer)