Differences between revisions 1 and 11 (spanning 10 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2016-10-27 16:44:28
Size: 1048
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2016-10-27 19:19:30
Size: 2218
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
'''Observers: Jaun + Florian -- Operator: Quique''' '''Observers: Juan + Florian -- Operator: Quique'''
Line 12: Line 12:
|| 172 || 16h01 || G34.3 || Track || 165.46 || 53.34 || || || We start a new session (Juan, Florian, operator: Quique). We decide to start by some dark tests ||
|| 173 || 16h08 || G34.3 || Pointing b || 166.14 || 53.38 || || || First a pointing --> The processing went well ||
|| 174 || 16h12 || G34.3 || Beammap || 174.73 || 54.11 || || || We now do a beammap in this dark test as we have not done such study in the previous sessions ||
|| 172 || 16h01 || G34.3 || Track || 165.46 || 53.34 || 0 0 0 0 || 3.48 || We start a new session (Juan, Florian, operator: Quique). We decide to start by some dark tests ||
|| 173 || 16h08 || G34.3 || Pointing b || 166.14 || 53.38 || 0 0 0 0 || 2.98 || First a pointing --> The processing went well ||
|| 174 || 16h12 || G34.3 || Beammap || 174.73 || 54.11 || 0 0 0 0 || 1.81 || We now do a beammap in azimuth in this dark test as we have not done such study in the previous sessions ||
|| 175 || 16h36 || G34.3 || Beammap || 181.09 || 54.27 || 0 0 0 0 || 0.73 || Beammap in elevation. WARNING: the cryostat temperature increased to 215 mK so we lost the pixels. ||
|| 176 || 17h56 || G34.3 || Pointing b || 210.51 || 49.97 || 0 0 0 0 || 0.70 || Martino managed to recover the nominal temperature so we launch a pointing to see the timeline behavior on trace ||
|| 176-187 || || || || || || || || Do not consider, doing test to check problems of oscillations when doing a track ||
|| 188 || 19h14|| Neptune || nkpoint b || 154 || 40 || 0.8 || DARK TEST no autotuning ||
|| 189 || 19h15|| Neptune || beam140scans || 154 || 40 || 0.8 || DARK TEST no autotuning, cancelled ||
|| 190 || 19h17|| Neptune || beam140scans || 154 || 40 || 0.8 || DARK TEST ||

NIKA2 run 6 26 October 2016

Back to list of day to day logbook of observations

2016-10-27

  • Quick description of the session: first dark tests then beammaps

Observers: Juan + Florian -- Operator: Quique

Scan

UT

Source

Command

Az

El

Pointing X, Y, Focus

Tau225

Comment

172

16h01

G34.3

Track

165.46

53.34

0 0 0 0

3.48

We start a new session (Juan, Florian, operator: Quique). We decide to start by some dark tests

173

16h08

G34.3

Pointing b

166.14

53.38

0 0 0 0

2.98

First a pointing --> The processing went well

174

16h12

G34.3

Beammap

174.73

54.11

0 0 0 0

1.81

We now do a beammap in azimuth in this dark test as we have not done such study in the previous sessions

175

16h36

G34.3

Beammap

181.09

54.27

0 0 0 0

0.73

Beammap in elevation. WARNING: the cryostat temperature increased to 215 mK so we lost the pixels.

176

17h56

G34.3

Pointing b

210.51

49.97

0 0 0 0

0.70

Martino managed to recover the nominal temperature so we launch a pointing to see the timeline behavior on trace

176-187

Do not consider, doing test to check problems of oscillations when doing a track

188

19h14

Neptune

nkpoint b

154

40

0.8

DARK TEST no autotuning

189

19h15

Neptune

beam140scans

154

40

0.8

DARK TEST no autotuning, cancelled

190

19h17

Neptune

beam140scans

154

40

0.8

DARK TEST

NK2run6_20161027 (last edited 2016-10-28 05:51:15 by NikaBolometer)