|
Size: 14918
Comment:
|
Size: 21579
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 123: | Line 123: |
| || 183 || 10:53 || Mars || skydip || 219 || * || 0.8 -0.4 0.40 || 0.5-0.7 || This was the last scan of the morning. Potentially interrupted. || ---- |
|
| Line 132: | Line 136: |
| || 286 || 19:15 || Neptune || focustrack y || 154 || 40 || -0.9 -5.5 0.22 || 0.85 || set focus /dir Y. || | || 286 || 19:15 || Neptune || focustrack y || 154 || 40 || -0.9 -5.5 0.22 || 0.85 || set focus 0.09/dir Y. very good fit. || || 287 || 19:20 || Neptune || skydip_DIY || 155 || * || -0.9 -5.5 0.22 || 1.12 || Very high tau. || || 288 || 19:26 || Neptune || track || 159 || 41 || -0.9 -5.5 0.22 || 1.1 || Very high tau. || || 289 || 19:28 || Neptune || nkpoint b || 159 || 41 || -0.9 -5.5 0.22 || 0.7 || set pointing -1.7 -3.7. || || 290-292 || 19:32 || Neptune || beammap || 159 || 41 || -1.7 -3.7 0.22 || 0.7 || || || 293 || 20:15 || Neptune || nkpoint b || 173 || 43 || -1.7 -3.7 0.22 || 0.86 || same as before || || 294 || 20:17 || Uranus || track || 118 || 41 || -1.7 -3.7 0.22 || 0.86 || || || 295 || 20:18 || Uranus || nkpoint b || 118 || 41 || -1.7 -3.7 0.22 || 0.86 || set point -1.1 -3.9, however bad fit in az. Repeat. || || 296 || 20:24 || Uranus || nkpoint b || 119 || 42 || -1.7 -3.7 0.22 || 0.76 || set point -1.6 -4.9. Good fit in both az and el. || || 297 || 20:27 || Uranus || nkpoint l || 121 || 43 || -1.6 -4.9 0.22 || 1.2!! || some little mistake. repeat. || || 298 || 20:31 || Uranus || nkpoint l || 121 || 43 || -1.7 -3.7 0.22 || 0.8 || we compare pointing l with b. set pointing -1.6 -4.2. Very similar results!. || || 299-301 || 20:40 || Uranus || beammap || 122 || 44 || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || 0.8 || || || 302 || 21:24 || Vesta || track || 163 || 41 || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || 1.0 !! || || || 303 || 21:26 || Vesta || nkpoint l || 163 || 41 || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || 1.0 !! || We don't see anything: might be because of the weather, too faint, catalog problem.|| || 304 || 21:32 || Vesta || skydip || 163 || * || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || 1.25!! || weather is getting worse. || || 305 || 21:38 || 2251+158 || track || 164 || || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || || || || 306 || 21:39 || 2251+158 || nkpoint b || || || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || || these two last scans are bad. do not consider. We had loaded the wrong catalog. Now go to 2251+158 || || 307 || 21:42 || 2251+158 || track || 212 || 66 || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || 0.7 || tau is really unstable. || || 308 || 21:44 || 2251+158 || nkpoint b || 212 || 66 || -1.6 -4.2 0.22 || 0.7 || set pointing -0.0 -0.6. good fit.|| || 309 || 21:49 || 2251+158 || focustrack z || 214 || 66 || 0.0 -0.65 0.22 || 0.78 || set focus 0.41. good fit.|| || 310 || 21:54 || 2251+158 || focustrack x || 217 || 65 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 1.14 || set focus -0.57/dir X. very good fit. || || 311 || 21:59 || 2251+158 || focustrack y || 219 || 64 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.78 || set focus 0.30/dir Y. good fit. || || 312 || 22:06 || 2251+158 || otf 1 3 0 0 20 40 radec || 222 || 63 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.78 || || || 313 || 22:07 || 2251+158 || otf 3 1 0 0 20 40 radec || 223 || 63 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.78 || || || 314 || 22:08 || 2251+158 || otf 1 3 0 0 20 40 azel || 223 || 63 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.72 || || || 315 || 22:09 || 2251+158 || otf 3 1 0 0 20 40 azel || 224 || 63 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.73 || || || 316 || 22:15 || 2201+315 || track || 269 || 62 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.65 || || || 317 || 22:17 || 2201+315 || nkpoint l || 269 || 62 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.65 || || || 318 || 22:20 || CRL26588 || track || || 285 || 50 ||0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.65 || || || 319 || 22:22 || CRL26588 || nkpoint l || 285 || 50 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.92 || we do not see the source. try point bright (2Jy source at 1mm).|| || 320 || 22:30 || CRL26588 || nkpoint b || 285 || 48 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.81 || we do not see anything with this weather at 2Jy (1mm). Go for a 7Jy (1mm) source. || || 321 || 22:33 || K3-50A || track || 288 || 35 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.81 || || || 322 || 22:34 || K3-50A || nkpoint l || 288 || 35 || 0.0 -0.65 0.41 || 0.81 || we see the source . set pointing -2.0 -4.9.|| || 323 || 22:41 || K3-50A || otf 3 3 0 0 10 36 radec || 288 || 33 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 0.81 || || || 324 || 22:41 || K3-50A || otf 3 3 45 0 10 36 radec || 288 || 33 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 0.81 || || || 325 || 22:41 || K3-50A || otf 3 3 90 0 10 36 radec || 288 || 33 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 0.81 || || || 326 || 22:41 || K3-50A || otf 3 3 135 0 10 36 radec || 288 || 33 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 0.81 || the central fluxes in the 4 maps are the same.|| || 327 || 22:52 || CygA || track || 298 || 34 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 1.24 || || || 328 || 22:55 || CygA || otf 4 4 0 0 10 36 radec|| 298 || 34 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 1.26 || we see CygA at 2mm !! || || 329 || 22:57 || CygA || otf 4 4 45 0 10 36 radec|| 298 || 34 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 1.26 || || || 330 || 22:57 || CygA || otf 3 3 90 0 10 36 radec|| 298 || 34 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 1.64 || || || 331 || 22:57 || CygA || otf 3 3 135 10 36 radec|| 298 || 34 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 3.5!! || || || 332 || 23:10 || 2013+370 || track || 294 || 32 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || || || || 333 || 23:11 || 2013+370 || nkpoint b || 294 || 32 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 2.1 || set pointing /// we don't see the source (3 Jy at 2mm) || || 334 || 23:14 || 2013+370 || nkpoint l || 294 || 32 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 2.1 || set pointing /// we don't see the source (3 Jy at 2mm) || || 335 || 23:17 || NGC7538 || track || 330 || 58 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || || || || 336 || 23:19 || NGC7538 || nkpoint l || 330 || 58 || -2.0 -4.9 0.41 || 2.2 || set pointing -0.8 -1.5 || || 337 || 23:19 || NGC7538 || - || 330 || 58 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 2.2 || cancelled || || 338 || 23:27 || NGC7538 || otf 4 4 0 0 10 36 azel || 330 || 58 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1.8 || don't find the file || || 339 || 23:31 || NGC7538 || otf 4 4 45 0 10 36 azel || 330 || 58 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1.8 || ERROR in reducing the data || || 340 || 23:35 || NGC7538 || otf 4 4 90 0 10 36 azel || 330 || 58 ||-0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1.8 || we see the source better at 1mm than 2mm || || 341 || 23:40 || NGC7538 || otf 4 4 135 0 10 36 azel || 330 || 58 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1.8 || Tau is completely unstable, check TAPAS for verification. We see the source in both channels.|| || 342 || 23:47 || CygA || track || 302 || 25 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1.93 || || || 343 || 23:49 || CygA || otf 4 4 0 0 10 36 azel|| 302 || 25 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1-2 || || || 344 || 23:53 || CygA || otf 4 4 45 0 10 36 azel|| 302 || 25|| -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1-2 || Canceled because of weather conditions. Rain rain go away come again another day! || || 345 || 23:57 || CygA || otf 4 4 90 0 10 36 azel|| 302 || 25 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1-2 || || || 1 || 0:01 || CygA || otf 4 4 135 10 36 azel|| 302 || 25 || -0.8 -1.5 0.41 || 1-2 || || || BREAK || || || || || || || || STOP: Bad weather || |
Describe NK2015_Oct24 here.
NIKA October 25, 2015 / S8
Back to list of day to day logbook of observations
2015-10-25
IMPORTANT NOTES ON OBSERVING INFO
- TAPAS is working properly
- Rely on TAPAS for most scan info (time, az, el, opacity)
- Here, this wiki will inform in greater detail the PAKO command and quick analysis of scans (e.g. pointing results).
Data Repository: /home/nika2/NIKA/Data/run13_X/scan24_X
Goal of the session:
- Push to faint point sources
- Re-assess KIDs every couple(?) of hours on a bright source
- Observe faint extended objects (NGC1068, Crab Nebula?)
- Have a great time
Scan |
UT |
Source |
Command |
Az |
El |
Pointing X, Y, Focus |
Tau225 |
Comment |
1 |
00:18 |
Uranus |
track |
211 |
55 |
0 0 0 |
0.6 |
|
2 |
00:19 |
Uranus |
track |
211 |
55 |
0 0 0 |
0.6 |
|
3 |
00:20 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
211 |
55 |
0 0 0 |
0.6 |
|
4-7 |
00:24 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
211 |
55 |
0 0 0 |
0.6 |
These first scans were useless because of many problems. The session of today starts with scan 8. |
8 |
00:50 |
Uranus |
track |
225 |
50 |
0 0 0 |
0.6 |
|
9 |
00:53 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
225 |
50 |
0 0 0 |
0.6 |
Bad weather. good fit. set pointing 2.3 -2.5 |
10 |
00:58 |
Uranus |
focustrack z |
225 |
50 |
2.3 -2.5 0 |
0.9 |
Because of the weather the resonances are very unstable. Very bad fit. Repeat. |
11 |
01:02 |
Uranus |
focustrack z |
227 |
50 |
2.3 -2.5 0 |
0.9 |
good fit. set focus 0.3. |
12-16 |
01:04 |
Uranus |
foculissold |
227 |
50 |
2.3 -2.5 0.3 |
0.8 |
we keep the correction of before. NAN in reducing data with nk_focus_liss_old |
17 |
01:18 |
|
skydip |
230 |
* |
2.3 -2.5 0.3 |
0.8 |
|
18 |
01:18 |
Uranus |
track |
234 |
45 |
2.3 -2.5 0.3 |
0.8 |
|
19 |
01:18 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
234 |
45 |
2.3 -2.5 0.3 |
0.8 |
Array 2: set pointing 2.7 -4.4 NOT CHANGED |
20 |
01:18 |
Uranus |
nkpoint l |
234 |
45 |
2.3 -2.5 0.3 |
0.9-1.0 |
Array 2: set pointing 2.6 -4.1 |
21 |
01:18 |
Uranus |
focustrack z |
237 |
43 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.9-1.0 |
Array 2: set focus 0.57 NOT APPLIED |
22-26 |
01:18 |
Uranus |
focuslissold |
237 |
43 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.9-1.0 |
we get something like 0.3 nk_focus_liss_old |
27 |
2:00 |
W3OH |
track |
336 |
61 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
|
28 |
2:00 |
W3OH |
nkpoint b |
336 |
61 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
|
29 |
2:00 |
W3OH |
nkliss 2 |
336 |
61 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
|
30-34 |
2:00 |
W3OH |
focuslissold |
336 |
61 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
2 scans lost over 5, bad fit; no change in pako |
35 |
2:00 |
W3OH |
nkotf_square 2 |
336 |
61 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
|
36 |
2:00 |
W3OH |
nkotf_square 2 |
336 |
61 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
|
37 |
2:00 |
GL490 |
track |
340 |
66 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
2Jy@1mm |
38 |
2:28 |
GL490 |
nkpoint b |
340 |
66 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
bad fit : pointing 6.8 -3.1 |
39 |
2:30 |
GL490 |
nkpoint l |
340 |
66 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
output@2mm : pointing 6.4 -3.7 ; fwhm = (14, 19) |
40 |
2:33 |
GL490 |
nkliss 2 |
340 |
66 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.7 |
|
41-54 |
2:39 |
GL490 |
nkotf_square 2 |
340 |
66 |
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.7 |
testing using pointing correction from scan 39; Pako command launched 6 times; fwhm = (12, 21) ; scan 49 has no raw data file ; ended at 3:07 |
55 |
2:33 |
GL490 |
nkliss 2 |
340 |
66 |
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.7 |
no raw data file; wether the pointing correction are ok or not is unconclusive; go on to a brighter source |
56 |
3:15 |
W3OH |
track |
|
|
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.7 |
previous team already observed it, move to 3C84 |
57 |
3:17 |
3C84 |
track |
289 |
67 |
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.7 |
|
58 |
3:19 |
3C84 |
nkpoint b |
289 |
67 |
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.7 |
results: pointing 6.7 -2.6; fwhm = (11, 18.5); not so bad considering the weather |
59 |
3:20 |
3C84 |
nkpoint l |
289 |
67 |
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.7 |
results: pointing 6.3 -3.4; fwhm = (12, 19); map more or less ok, the cross-shaped side lobe are there; we keep the current value |
60 |
3:26 |
3C84 |
nkliss 2 |
289 |
67 |
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.8 |
tau 225 = 0.8 +/- 0.05 |
61-66 |
3:32 |
3C84 |
nkotf_square 2 |
289 |
67 |
6.4 -3.7 0.3 |
0.8 |
ended at 3:42 |
67-71 |
|
3C84 |
focuslissold |
289 |
67 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.8 |
the best map at z=0.3, no need to change |
72 |
|
NGC7538 |
track |
327 |
27 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.8 |
|
73 |
|
NGC7538 |
nkpoint b |
327 |
27 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.8 |
outputs : 1.8 -5.8, large beams |
74 |
|
NGC7538 |
nkpoint l |
327 |
27 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.8 |
outputs : 2.1 -6.0 consistent results |
75-79 |
|
NGC7538 |
focuslissold |
327 |
27 |
2.6 -4.1 0.3 |
0.8 |
set pointing 2.1 -6.0 ; no raw data file for scan 76; only 2 maps over 5, not usable; launch another one with the new pointing correction |
80-84 |
4:10 |
NGC7538 |
focuslissold |
327 |
27 |
2.1 -6.0 0.3 |
0.8 |
Flux A2: 0.23 ; nice ! |
85 |
|
NGC7538 |
focustrack z |
327 |
27 |
2.1 -6.0 0.3 |
0.8 |
outputs: Array 1: focus -0.38 Array 3: focus -1.06 ; we take the focus old outputs : set focus 0.23 |
86-87 |
4:23 |
NGC7538 |
nkliss 2 |
329 |
25 |
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.53 |
|
87-95 |
4:28 |
NGC7538 |
nkotf_square 2 |
329 |
25 |
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.53 |
|
96-100 |
4:51 |
NGC7538 |
focuslissold |
327 |
27 |
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.8 |
failed to fit, one scan is an outlier. no new setting. Move to TauIRS and CasA on the way. |
101 |
5:01 |
Cas A |
track |
329 |
20 |
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.7 |
|
102-103 |
5:04 |
Cas A |
nkotf_square 2 |
329 |
20 |
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.7 |
elevation too low to go on integrating. |
104 |
5:08 |
ZZTauIRS |
track |
329 |
20 |
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.7 |
77mJy @ 1mm |
105 |
5:08 |
3C84 |
track |
|
|
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.7 |
for pointing |
106 |
5:08 |
3C84 |
nkpoint b |
|
|
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.7 |
Array 2: 2.5 -4.4; fits are ok; fwhm = ( 10.5 @ 1mm , 19 @ 2mm ) |
107 |
5:15 |
3C84 |
nkpoint l |
|
|
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.7 |
Array 2: 1.2 -4.5; fwhm = ( 11.5 @ 1mm , 19 @ 2mm ); consistent results. set pointing 1.2 -4.5 |
108 |
5:18 |
3C84 |
nkpoint b |
|
|
2.1 -6.0 0.23 |
0.7 |
Array 2: 1.9 -4.3; fits are ok; fwhm = ( 10.7 @ 1mm , 18 @ 2mm ) |
109 |
5:22 |
ZZTauIRS |
track |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.7 |
|
110-116 |
5:26 |
ZZTauIRS |
nkotf_square 1 |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
117 |
5:36 |
ZZTauIRS |
nkliss 1 |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
output: 76 +/- 18 mJy @ 1mm, 20 +/- 10 mJy @ 2 mm; results consistent with expectations |
118 |
5:42 |
ZZTauIRS |
nkliss 1 |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
output: -31 +/- 15 mJy @ 1mm, 13 +/- 9 mJy @ 2 mm; results consistent with noise.... |
119 |
5:50 |
ZZTauIRS |
nkliss 1 |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
120 |
5:56 |
ZZTauIRS |
nkliss 1 |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
121 |
6:01 |
0528+134 |
track |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
122 |
6:03 |
0528+134 |
nkpoint l |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
Array 2: 49.2 56.2; too faint |
123 |
6:07 |
0528+134 |
nkpoint b |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
124 |
6:10 |
Crab |
track |
256 |
53 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
125 |
6:12 |
Crab |
nkpoint b |
256 |
53 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
bad fit. hint of something at 2mm |
126 |
6:13 |
Crab |
nkpoint l |
256 |
53 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
ghostly crab appears at 2mm; go on integrating |
127-134 |
6:19 |
Crab |
nkotf_square 6 |
256 |
53 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
135-142 |
6:44 |
Crab |
nkotf_square 10 |
256 |
53 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
135 is beautiful ! launching 2 more commands for breakfast |
143 |
7:46 |
|
skydip DIY |
256 |
53- |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
Pako crashed |
144 |
7:57 |
|
skydip DIY |
256 |
53- |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
145 |
8:09 |
3C286 |
track |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
2 Jy |
146 |
8:09 |
3C286 |
nkpoint b |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
recovering resonances |
147 |
8:09 |
3C286 |
nkpoint l |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
poor data |
148 |
8:09 |
3C286 |
nkpoint b |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
poor fit: outputs -13.2 8.4 |
149 |
8:09 |
3C286 |
nkpoint l |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
outputs -2.6 -6.4; better but map is quite noisy, give not confidence |
150 |
8:25 |
3C286 |
focustrack z |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
waiting for the results of nkpoint liss; poor fit |
151 |
8:28 |
3C345 |
track |
|
|
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
5 Jy |
152 |
8:28 |
3C345 |
nkpoint b |
415 |
22 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
nothing |
153 |
8:28 |
3C345 |
nkpoint l |
415 |
22 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
154 |
8:28 |
3C345 |
nkpoint l |
415 |
22 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
155 |
8:28 |
3C345 |
nkpoint b |
415 |
22 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
outputs : -7.4 -15.5 set pointing 0.7 -4.3 |
156 |
8:50 |
3C345 |
nkpoint b |
415 |
22 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
set pointing 0.7 -4.3 ; fwhm = (16.5, 20.5) |
157 |
8:50 |
3C345 |
focustrack z |
415 |
22 |
1.2 -4.5 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
set pointing 0.7 -4.3 ; fwhm = (16.5, 20.5) |
158-162 |
8:55 |
3C345 |
focuslissold |
415 |
22 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
no fit; the current z focus value yields the best map; no change applied in pako |
163 |
9:07 |
ARP220 |
track |
|
|
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
SET TOPO HIGH (yeah....) |
164 |
9:09 |
ARP220 |
nkliss 1 |
442 |
33 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
as seen by NIKA1 : 243 mJy @ 1mm , 52 mJy @ 2mm |
165 |
9:09 |
ARP220 |
nkliss 1 |
442 |
33 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
only noise; move to Mars |
166 |
9:09 |
ARP220 |
nkliss 1 |
442 |
33 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
only noise; move to Mars |
167 |
9:25 |
Mars |
track |
|
|
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
SET TOPO LOW: we have to go all the way round anyway |
168 |
9:25 |
Mars |
nkpoint b |
188 |
58 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
outputs: 2.5 0.1 , fwhm, 12 @ 1mm; 19 @ 2mm |
169 |
9:25 |
Mars |
focustrack z |
188 |
58 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
Array 2: 0.44 |
170 |
9:25 |
Mars |
focustrack x |
188 |
58 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
171 |
9:25 |
Mars |
focustrack y |
188 |
58 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
output: 0.50 /dir Y |
172 |
9:43 |
Mars |
nkpoint l |
188 |
58 |
0.7 -4.3 0.23 |
0.5-0.7 |
Array 2: set pointing 2.2 -1.5 ; SET POINTING 2.5 0.1; SET FOCUS 0.44; |
173-177 |
9:46 |
Mars |
focuslissold |
188 |
58 |
2.5 0.1 0.44 |
0.5-0.7 |
SET FOCUS 0.5 /dir Y; |
178 |
9:54 |
Mars |
nkpoint b |
194 |
58 |
2.5 0.1 0.44 |
0.5-0.7 |
SET FOCUS 0.4; set pointing 0.8 -0.4 ; fwhm, 11 @ 1mm; 18 @ 2mm |
179 |
10:04 |
Mars |
nkpoint l |
200 |
58 |
0.8 -0.4 0.40 |
0.5-0.7 |
outputs: Array 2, 0.6 -0.3; consistent |
180-182 |
10:11 |
Mars |
beammap |
200 |
58 |
0.8 -0.4 0.40 |
0.5-0.7 |
|
BREAK |
10:30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Change of observers - Now Charles & Juan |
183 |
10:53 |
Mars |
skydip |
219 |
* |
0.8 -0.4 0.40 |
0.5-0.7 |
This was the last scan of the morning. Potentially interrupted. |
277 |
18:37 |
G34.3 |
track |
220 |
47 |
0 0 0 |
0.8 |
We start another evening session of observations! Weather is still bad. Thus we do a geometry session. (20Jy source) |
|
278 |
18:38 |
G34.3 |
nkpoint b |
220 |
47 |
0 0 0 |
0.8 |
not good fit. set pointing -2.4 -3.7 |
|
279 |
18:40 |
G34.3 |
focustrack z |
220 |
47 |
-2.4 -3.7 0 |
0.8 |
set focus 0.51. not good fit. We move to Neptune to point and focus again. |
|
280 |
18:45 |
Neptune |
track |
146 |
37 |
-2.4 -3.7 0 |
0.8 |
|
|
281 |
18:46 |
Neptune |
nkpoint b |
146 |
37 |
-2.4 -3.7 0 |
0.8 |
set pointing -0.9 -5.5. bad fit. |
|
282 |
18:53 |
Neptune |
focustrack z |
148 |
38 |
-0.9 -5.5 0 |
0.8 |
set focus 0.25. nice fit. we repeat to make sure. |
|
283 |
19:01 |
Neptune |
focustrack z |
150 |
38 |
-0.9 -5.5 0.25 |
0.8 |
set focus 0.22. better fit. |
|
284 |
19:05 |
Neptune |
focustrack x |
151 |
39 |
-0.9 -5.5 0.22 |
0.8 |
set focus -1.50/dir X. bad fit. repeat. |
|
285 |
19:10 |
Neptune |
focustrack x |
152 |
39 |
-0.9 -5.5 0.22 |
0.8 |
set focus -0.67/dir X. bad fit. better fit. go Y. |
|
286 |
19:15 |
Neptune |
focustrack y |
154 |
40 |
-0.9 -5.5 0.22 |
0.85 |
set focus 0.09/dir Y. very good fit. |
|
287 |
19:20 |
Neptune |
skydip_DIY |
155 |
* |
-0.9 -5.5 0.22 |
1.12 |
Very high tau. |
|
288 |
19:26 |
Neptune |
track |
159 |
41 |
-0.9 -5.5 0.22 |
1.1 |
Very high tau. |
|
289 |
19:28 |
Neptune |
nkpoint b |
159 |
41 |
-0.9 -5.5 0.22 |
0.7 |
set pointing -1.7 -3.7. |
|
290-292 |
19:32 |
Neptune |
beammap |
159 |
41 |
-1.7 -3.7 0.22 |
0.7 |
|
|
293 |
20:15 |
Neptune |
nkpoint b |
173 |
43 |
-1.7 -3.7 0.22 |
0.86 |
same as before |
|
294 |
20:17 |
Uranus |
track |
118 |
41 |
-1.7 -3.7 0.22 |
0.86 |
|
|
295 |
20:18 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
118 |
41 |
-1.7 -3.7 0.22 |
0.86 |
set point -1.1 -3.9, however bad fit in az. Repeat. |
|
296 |
20:24 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
119 |
42 |
-1.7 -3.7 0.22 |
0.76 |
set point -1.6 -4.9. Good fit in both az and el. |
|
297 |
20:27 |
Uranus |
nkpoint l |
121 |
43 |
-1.6 -4.9 0.22 |
1.2!! |
some little mistake. repeat. |
|
298 |
20:31 |
Uranus |
nkpoint l |
121 |
43 |
-1.7 -3.7 0.22 |
0.8 |
we compare pointing l with b. set pointing -1.6 -4.2. Very similar results!. |
|
299-301 |
20:40 |
Uranus |
beammap |
122 |
44 |
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
0.8 |
|
|
302 |
21:24 |
Vesta |
track |
163 |
41 |
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
1.0 !! |
|
|
303 |
21:26 |
Vesta |
nkpoint l |
163 |
41 |
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
1.0 !! |
We don't see anything: might be because of the weather, too faint, catalog problem. |
|
304 |
21:32 |
Vesta |
skydip |
163 |
* |
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
1.25!! |
weather is getting worse. |
|
305 |
21:38 |
2251+158 |
track |
164 |
|
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
|
|
|
306 |
21:39 |
2251+158 |
nkpoint b |
|
|
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
|
these two last scans are bad. do not consider. We had loaded the wrong catalog. Now go to 2251+158 |
|
307 |
21:42 |
2251+158 |
track |
212 |
66 |
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
0.7 |
tau is really unstable. |
|
308 |
21:44 |
2251+158 |
nkpoint b |
212 |
66 |
-1.6 -4.2 0.22 |
0.7 |
set pointing -0.0 -0.6. good fit. |
|
309 |
21:49 |
2251+158 |
focustrack z |
214 |
66 |
0.0 -0.65 0.22 |
0.78 |
set focus 0.41. good fit. |
|
310 |
21:54 |
2251+158 |
focustrack x |
217 |
65 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
1.14 |
set focus -0.57/dir X. very good fit. |
|
311 |
21:59 |
2251+158 |
focustrack y |
219 |
64 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.78 |
set focus 0.30/dir Y. good fit. |
|
312 |
22:06 |
2251+158 |
otf 1 3 0 0 20 40 radec |
222 |
63 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.78 |
|
|
313 |
22:07 |
2251+158 |
otf 3 1 0 0 20 40 radec |
223 |
63 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.78 |
|
|
314 |
22:08 |
2251+158 |
otf 1 3 0 0 20 40 azel |
223 |
63 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.72 |
|
|
315 |
22:09 |
2251+158 |
otf 3 1 0 0 20 40 azel |
224 |
63 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.73 |
|
|
316 |
22:15 |
2201+315 |
track |
269 |
62 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.65 |
|
|
317 |
22:17 |
2201+315 |
nkpoint l |
269 |
62 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.65 |
|
|
318 |
22:20 |
CRL26588 |
track |
|
285 |
50 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.65 |
|
319 |
22:22 |
CRL26588 |
nkpoint l |
285 |
50 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.92 |
we do not see the source. try point bright (2Jy source at 1mm). |
|
320 |
22:30 |
CRL26588 |
nkpoint b |
285 |
48 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.81 |
we do not see anything with this weather at 2Jy (1mm). Go for a 7Jy (1mm) source. |
|
321 |
22:33 |
K3-50A |
track |
288 |
35 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.81 |
|
|
322 |
22:34 |
K3-50A |
nkpoint l |
288 |
35 |
0.0 -0.65 0.41 |
0.81 |
we see the source . set pointing -2.0 -4.9. |
|
323 |
22:41 |
K3-50A |
otf 3 3 0 0 10 36 radec |
288 |
33 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
0.81 |
|
|
324 |
22:41 |
K3-50A |
otf 3 3 45 0 10 36 radec |
288 |
33 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
0.81 |
|
|
325 |
22:41 |
K3-50A |
otf 3 3 90 0 10 36 radec |
288 |
33 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
0.81 |
|
|
326 |
22:41 |
K3-50A |
otf 3 3 135 0 10 36 radec |
288 |
33 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
0.81 |
the central fluxes in the 4 maps are the same. |
|
327 |
22:52 |
CygA |
track |
298 |
34 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
1.24 |
|
|
328 |
22:55 |
CygA |
otf 4 4 0 0 10 36 radec |
298 |
34 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
1.26 |
we see CygA at 2mm !! |
|
329 |
22:57 |
CygA |
otf 4 4 45 0 10 36 radec |
298 |
34 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
1.26 |
|
|
330 |
22:57 |
CygA |
otf 3 3 90 0 10 36 radec |
298 |
34 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
1.64 |
|
|
331 |
22:57 |
CygA |
otf 3 3 135 10 36 radec |
298 |
34 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
3.5!! |
|
|
332 |
23:10 |
2013+370 |
track |
294 |
32 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
|
|
|
333 |
23:11 |
2013+370 |
nkpoint b |
294 |
32 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
2.1 |
set pointing /// we don't see the source (3 Jy at 2mm) |
|
334 |
23:14 |
2013+370 |
nkpoint l |
294 |
32 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
2.1 |
set pointing /// we don't see the source (3 Jy at 2mm) |
|
335 |
23:17 |
NGC7538 |
track |
330 |
58 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
|
|
|
336 |
23:19 |
NGC7538 |
nkpoint l |
330 |
58 |
-2.0 -4.9 0.41 |
2.2 |
set pointing -0.8 -1.5 |
|
337 |
23:19 |
NGC7538 |
- |
330 |
58 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
2.2 |
cancelled |
|
338 |
23:27 |
NGC7538 |
otf 4 4 0 0 10 36 azel |
330 |
58 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1.8 |
don't find the file |
|
339 |
23:31 |
NGC7538 |
otf 4 4 45 0 10 36 azel |
330 |
58 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1.8 |
ERROR in reducing the data |
|
340 |
23:35 |
NGC7538 |
otf 4 4 90 0 10 36 azel |
330 |
58 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1.8 |
we see the source better at 1mm than 2mm |
|
341 |
23:40 |
NGC7538 |
otf 4 4 135 0 10 36 azel |
330 |
58 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1.8 |
Tau is completely unstable, check TAPAS for verification. We see the source in both channels. |
|
342 |
23:47 |
CygA |
track |
302 |
25 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1.93 |
|
|
343 |
23:49 |
CygA |
otf 4 4 0 0 10 36 azel |
302 |
25 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1-2 |
|
|
344 |
23:53 |
CygA |
otf 4 4 45 0 10 36 azel |
302 |
25 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1-2 |
Canceled because of weather conditions. Rain rain go away come again another day! |
|
345 |
23:57 |
CygA |
otf 4 4 90 0 10 36 azel |
302 |
25 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1-2 |
|
|
1 |
0:01 |
CygA |
otf 4 4 135 10 36 azel |
302 |
25 |
-0.8 -1.5 0.41 |
1-2 |
|
|
BREAK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOP: Bad weather |