Size: 8606
Comment:
|
Size: 11989
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 55: | Line 55: |
|| 44 || 04:28 || GL490 || nkotf azel || 324 || 55 || 2.3, -0.5, 0.00 || 0.50 || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0716+714 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable) || || 45 || 04:39 || 0716+714 || track || 366 || 55 || 2.3, -0.5, 0.00 || 0.58 || || || 46 || 04:39 || 0716+714 || nkpoint l || 366 || 55 || 2.3, -0.5, 0.00 || 0. || set pointing 1.6 -1.1 || || 47 || 04:28 || 0716+714 || nkotf azel || 366 || || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0. || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0420-014 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable) || || 48 || 04:58 || 0420-014 || track || 230 || 38 || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0.58 || || || 49 || 04:59 || 0420-014 || nkpoint l || 230 || 38 || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0. || set pointing -1.9 -0.1 || || 50 || 05:03 || 0420-014 || nkotf azel || 230 || || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0. || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel || || 51 || 05:14 || 0727-115 || track || 172 || 40 || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0.58 || || || 52 || 05:15 || 0727-115 || nkpoint l || 172 || 40 || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0. || set pointing -1.9 -0.1 || || 53 || 05: || 0727-115 || nkotf azel || 172 || 40 || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0. || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel || || 54 || 05:14 || 0923+392 || track || 230 || 38 || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0.58 || || || 55 || 04:59 || 0923+392 || nkpoint l || 230 || 38 || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0. || set pointing -1.9 -0.1 || || 56 || 05:03 || 0923+392 || nkotf azel || 230 || || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0. || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel || |
|| 44 || 04:28 || GL490 || nkotf azel || 324 || 55 || 2.3, -0.5, 0.00 || 0.50 || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0716+714 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable) || || 45 || 04:39 || 0716+714 || track || 366 || 55 || 2.3, -0.5, 0.00 || 0.58 || || || 46 || 04:39 || 0716+714 || nkpoint l || 366 || 55 || 2.3, -0.5, 0.00 || 0.43 || set pointing 1.6 -1.1 || || 47 || 04:28 || 0716+714 || nkotf azel || 366 || || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0.45 || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0420-014 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable) || || 48 || 04:58 || 0420-014 || track || 230 || 38 || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0.39 || || || 49 || 04:59 || 0420-014 || nkpoint l || 230 || 38 || 1.6, -1.1, 0.00 || 0.69 || set pointing -1.9 -0.1 || || 50 || 05:03 || 0420-014 || nkotf azel || 230 || || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0.38 || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel || || 51 || 05:14 || 0727-115 || track || 172 || 40 || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0.43 || || || 52 || 05:15 || 0727-115 || nkpoint l || 172 || 40 || -1.9, -0.1, 0.00 || 0.43 || set pointing 0.2 0.2 || || 53 || 05:21 || 0727-115 || nkotf azel || 172 || 40 || 0.2, 0.2, 0.00 || 0.43 || nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel || || 54 || 05:32 || 0923+392 || track || 75 || 65 || 0.2, 0.2, 0.00 || 0.36 || tau much more stable. even if poor || || 55 || 05:33 || 0923+392 || nkpoint l || 75 || 65 || 0.2, 0.2, 0.00 || 0.41 || set pointing 1.0, 1.1 this source has a steep spectrum according to iram monitoring || || 56 || 05:40 || 0923+392 || nkotf azel || 76 || 69 || 1.0, 1.1, 0.00 || 0.41 || nkotf 6 6 0 0 5 20 azel . Tau stable. then skydip, Next a retuning, we are down to 50% of the pixels on line B. Then focus session on Mars Back to nsample=6 on focustrack. || || 57 || 06:03 || 0923+392 || skydip_DIY || 76 || || 1.0, 1.1 0.00 || 0.42 || || || 58 || 06:14 || mars || track ||114 || 38 || 1.0, 1.1, 0.00 || 0.45 ||retuning got back B || || 59 || 06:18 || mars || point b ||114 || 38 || 1.0, 1.1, 0.00 || 0.45 || set pointing -0.7, -1.1 || || 60 || 06:20 || mars || focustrack z ||115 || 38 || -0.7, -1.1, 0.00 || 0.45 || very good fit, -0.01, (-0.08 at 1mm, also a good fit). set focus -0.01 || || 61 || 06:26 || mars || focustrack x ||115 || 38 || -0.7, -1.1, -0.01 || 0.45 || good fit at 2mm, no fit at 1mm, set focus -0.88 /dir X not too far from what we had. repeat to try to see a fit at 1mm|| || 62 || 06:30 || mars || focustrack x ||117 || 40 || -0.7, -1.1, -0.01 || 0.45 || good fit again. set focus -0.53 /dir X, see a fit at 1mm at -2.35, but not great. repeat|| || 63 || 06:34 || mars || focustrack x ||118 || 40 || -0.7, -1.1, -0.01 || 0.45 || good fit again. set focus -0.57 /dir X, see a fit at 1mm at -1.72, but not great. switch to y|| || 64 || 06:38 || mars || focustrack y ||119 || 41 || -0.7, -1.1, -0.01 || 0.45 || good fit set focus -0.02 /dir Y, no fit at 1mm. repeat|| || 65 || 06:42 || mars || focustrack y ||120 || 42 || -0.7, -1.1, -0.01 || 0.44 || not so good fit @ 2mm, set focus 0.56 /dir Y. poor fit at 1mm, 0.64 || || 66 || 06:47 || mars || focustrack y ||121 || 43 || -0.7, -1.1, -0.01 || 0.41 || not so good fit @ 2mm, set focus 0.26 /dir Y. no fit at 1mm ercheck focus z to see impact of moving|| || 67 || 06:51 || mars || focustrack z ||122 || 44 || -0.7, -1.1, -0.01 || 0.41 || good fit, set focus 0.03. no efect on z. now check beam size|| || 68 || 06:55 || mars || nkpoint b ||123 || 44 || -0.7, -1.1, 0.03 || 0.41 || set pointing -0.3 -0.5 FWHM 1mm : 11x13.5" 2mm: 18.2 x 18.4" We think we are at our best focus. now we do focusliss on all three axes, but don't apply the results. just for comparison.|| || 69 || 06:58 || mars || focusliss z ||124 || 45 || -0.3, -0.5, -0.03 || 0.44 || Data looks very poor no fit. Would be intersting to reprocess to see what comes out|| || 70 || 07:05 || mars || focusliss y ||124 || 45 || -0.3, -0.5, -0.03 || 0.44 || No imbfits. not processd || || 71 || 07:11 || mars || focusliss z ||130 || 48 || -0.3, -0.5, -0.03 || 0.44 || Data looks very poor poor fit. Would be intersting to reprocess to see what|| || 72 - 75 || 07:21 || mars || beammap || 131 || 49 || -0.3, -0.5, -0.03 || 0.44 || || || 76 || || 3c279 || track || || || || || || 19 Jy @ 2mm |
Describe NK2015_Oct22 here.
NIKA October 23, 2015 / S8
Back to list of day to day logbook of observations
2015-10-23
Following not updated
TAPAS is working properly
Data Repository: /home/nika2/NIKA/Data/run13_X/scan24_X
Goal of the session:
- OTF geometry and beam map on Uranus: DONE
- check pointing on faint sources (pako pointing f and pointing l): Done pointing l, rta can't reduce pointing f
- Secondary calibrators and QSO with various spectral slopes according to iram monitoring: started
- Mars again
Scan |
UT |
Source |
Command |
Az |
El |
Pointing X, Y, Focus |
Tau225 |
Comment |
12 |
|
Uranus |
track |
|
|
0 0 0 |
0.39 |
We are not as good as Martino. took us 25 minutes to get the resonances... |
13 |
01h37 |
Uranus |
skydip_DIY |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
resonances well peaked after the skydip. auto_nika_rta tries to reduce skydip and fails. |
14 |
01h40 |
Uranus |
track |
236 |
44 |
0 0 0 |
|
|
15 |
01h40 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
236 |
44 |
0 0 0 |
0.46 |
good fit. set pointing 0.3 0.8. FWHM = 14"@1mm, 19"@2mm |
16 |
01h42 |
Uranus |
focustrack z |
237 |
44 |
0.3, 0.8 , 0. |
0.46 |
not a great fit. set focus -0.42 and do it again. |
17 |
01h48 |
Uranus |
focustrack z |
237 |
44 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0. 42 |
0.45 |
better fit. set focus -0.35 |
18 |
01h50 |
Uranus |
focustrack x |
239 |
43 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0.35 |
0.46 |
good fit. set focus -0.32 /dir X . large change, do it again to check |
19 |
01h56 |
Uranus |
focustrack x |
239 |
42 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0.35 |
0.46 |
good fit. set focus /dir X -0.83 Large change !!! try Y and set nsubscan to 9 from scan 21 onward |
20 |
02h03 |
Uranus |
focustrack y |
241 |
41 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0.35 |
0.46 |
good fit. set focus 0.29 /dir Y. large change, do it again to check |
21 |
02h04 |
Uranus |
focustrack y |
242 |
40 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0.35 |
0.46 |
not a good fit, no solution @ 2mm. Do a pointing to check beam shape |
22 |
02h10 |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
243 |
40 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0.35 |
0.46 |
set pointing -0.5 1, beam is 13" - 18" and looks more circular |
23 |
02h10 |
Uranus |
beammap |
243 |
39 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0.35 |
0.46 |
Scan cancelled, forgot to update pointing before lauching |
24-26 |
02h15 |
Uranus |
beammap |
244 |
36 |
-0.5, 1.0, -0.35 |
0.2-0.79 |
resonances fine at the start of first, second and third scan. tau 225 unstable during map |
27 |
02h |
Uranus |
nkpoint b |
252 |
20 |
0.3, 0.8 , -0.35 |
0.46 |
check pointing after beammap. set pointing -0.6 -0.3 . beam looks larger. 13" and 20" |
28 |
03h01 |
Uranus |
skydip_DIY |
252 |
|
-0.6, -0.3, -0.35 |
0.44 |
resonances well peaked after the skydip. auto_nika_rta tries to reduce skydip and fails. Uranus getting low, will check focus on 3C84 |
29 |
03h08 |
3C84 |
track |
290 |
70 |
-0.6, -0.3, -0.35 |
0.41 |
|
30 |
03h11 |
3C84 |
nkpoint b |
290 |
70 |
-0.6, -0.3, -0.35 |
0.41 |
set pointing 5.9, 0.7. does not look too good, will try point faint |
31 |
03h15 |
3C84 |
nkpoint f |
290 |
69 |
5.9, 0.7, -0.35 |
0.61 |
auto_nk_rta cannot reduce the pointing. neglect corrections. try point liss. |
32 |
03h20 |
3C84 |
nkpoint l |
290 |
68 |
5.9, 0.7, -0.35 |
0.96 |
set pointing 5.0 1.2. FWHM 12 and 18" will try to focus... |
33 |
03h26 |
3C84 |
focustrack z |
289 |
67 |
5.0, 1.2, -0.35 |
0.43 |
tau very unstable... set focus -0.04 set nsubscans to 10 |
34 |
03h30 |
3C84 |
focustrack z |
289 |
67 |
5.0, 1.2, -0.04 |
0.43 |
tau very unstable... do not help having a good fit without opacity correction set focus 0.00 set subscan to 12 |
35 |
03h38 |
3C84 |
focustrack x |
289 |
64 |
5.0, 1.2, -0.00 |
0.43 |
set focus -0.77 /dir X opacity variation not helping |
36 |
03h45 |
3C84 |
focustrack y |
289 |
64 |
5.0, 1.2, -0.00 |
0.43 |
good fit. set focus 0.13 /dir Y small move since last time redo a point liss to check beam shape. |
37 |
03h52 |
3C84 |
nkpoint l |
290 |
61 |
5.0, 1.2, -0.00 |
0.42 |
set pointing 3.7, 1.9. Beam does not look great or is it the source ? |
38 |
03h55 |
3C84 |
nkotf radec |
290 |
59 |
3.7, 1.9, -0.00 |
0.42 |
nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 radec FWHM 13", 19" urgh... |
39 |
04:08 |
W3OH |
track |
324 |
49 |
3.7, 1.9, 0.00 |
0.49 |
|
40 |
04:09 |
W3OH |
nkpoint b |
324 |
49 |
3.7, 1.9, 0.00 |
0.47 |
set pointing 2.2 1.4 |
41 |
04:12 |
W3OH |
nkotf azel |
324 |
49 |
2.2, 1.4, 0.00 |
0.46 |
nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel |
42 |
04:21 |
GL490 |
track |
322 |
55 |
2.2, 1.4, 0.00 |
0.39 |
|
43 |
04:22 |
GL490 |
nkpoint l |
322 |
54 |
2.2, 1.4, 0.00 |
0.39 |
set pointing 2.3 -0.5 |
44 |
04:28 |
GL490 |
nkotf azel |
324 |
55 |
2.3, -0.5, 0.00 |
0.50 |
nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0716+714 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable) |
45 |
04:39 |
0716+714 |
track |
366 |
55 |
2.3, -0.5, 0.00 |
0.58 |
|
46 |
04:39 |
0716+714 |
nkpoint l |
366 |
55 |
2.3, -0.5, 0.00 |
0.43 |
set pointing 1.6 -1.1 |
47 |
04:28 |
0716+714 |
nkotf azel |
366 |
|
1.6, -1.1, 0.00 |
0.45 |
nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0420-014 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable) |
48 |
04:58 |
0420-014 |
track |
230 |
38 |
1.6, -1.1, 0.00 |
0.39 |
|
49 |
04:59 |
0420-014 |
nkpoint l |
230 |
38 |
1.6, -1.1, 0.00 |
0.69 |
set pointing -1.9 -0.1 |
50 |
05:03 |
0420-014 |
nkotf azel |
230 |
|
-1.9, -0.1, 0.00 |
0.38 |
nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel |
51 |
05:14 |
0727-115 |
track |
172 |
40 |
-1.9, -0.1, 0.00 |
0.43 |
|
52 |
05:15 |
0727-115 |
nkpoint l |
172 |
40 |
-1.9, -0.1, 0.00 |
0.43 |
set pointing 0.2 0.2 |
53 |
05:21 |
0727-115 |
nkotf azel |
172 |
40 |
0.2, 0.2, 0.00 |
0.43 |
nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel |
54 |
05:32 |
0923+392 |
track |
75 |
65 |
0.2, 0.2, 0.00 |
0.36 |
tau much more stable. even if poor |
55 |
05:33 |
0923+392 |
nkpoint l |
75 |
65 |
0.2, 0.2, 0.00 |
0.41 |
set pointing 1.0, 1.1 this source has a steep spectrum according to iram monitoring |
56 |
05:40 |
0923+392 |
nkotf azel |
76 |
69 |
1.0, 1.1, 0.00 |
0.41 |
nkotf 6 6 0 0 5 20 azel . Tau stable. then skydip, Next a retuning, we are down to 50% of the pixels on line B. Then focus session on Mars Back to nsample=6 on focustrack. |
57 |
06:03 |
0923+392 |
skydip_DIY |
76 |
|
1.0, 1.1 0.00 |
0.42 |
|
58 |
06:14 |
mars |
track |
114 |
38 |
1.0, 1.1, 0.00 |
0.45 |
retuning got back B |
59 |
06:18 |
mars |
point b |
114 |
38 |
1.0, 1.1, 0.00 |
0.45 |
set pointing -0.7, -1.1 |
60 |
06:20 |
mars |
focustrack z |
115 |
38 |
-0.7, -1.1, 0.00 |
0.45 |
very good fit, -0.01, (-0.08 at 1mm, also a good fit). set focus -0.01 |
61 |
06:26 |
mars |
focustrack x |
115 |
38 |
-0.7, -1.1, -0.01 |
0.45 |
good fit at 2mm, no fit at 1mm, set focus -0.88 /dir X not too far from what we had. repeat to try to see a fit at 1mm |
62 |
06:30 |
mars |
focustrack x |
117 |
40 |
-0.7, -1.1, -0.01 |
0.45 |
good fit again. set focus -0.53 /dir X, see a fit at 1mm at -2.35, but not great. repeat |
63 |
06:34 |
mars |
focustrack x |
118 |
40 |
-0.7, -1.1, -0.01 |
0.45 |
good fit again. set focus -0.57 /dir X, see a fit at 1mm at -1.72, but not great. switch to y |
64 |
06:38 |
mars |
focustrack y |
119 |
41 |
-0.7, -1.1, -0.01 |
0.45 |
good fit set focus -0.02 /dir Y, no fit at 1mm. repeat |
65 |
06:42 |
mars |
focustrack y |
120 |
42 |
-0.7, -1.1, -0.01 |
0.44 |
not so good fit @ 2mm, set focus 0.56 /dir Y. poor fit at 1mm, 0.64 |
66 |
06:47 |
mars |
focustrack y |
121 |
43 |
-0.7, -1.1, -0.01 |
0.41 |
not so good fit @ 2mm, set focus 0.26 /dir Y. no fit at 1mm ercheck focus z to see impact of moving |
67 |
06:51 |
mars |
focustrack z |
122 |
44 |
-0.7, -1.1, -0.01 |
0.41 |
good fit, set focus 0.03. no efect on z. now check beam size |
68 |
06:55 |
mars |
nkpoint b |
123 |
44 |
-0.7, -1.1, 0.03 |
0.41 |
set pointing -0.3 -0.5 FWHM 1mm : 11x13.5" 2mm: 18.2 x 18.4" We think we are at our best focus. now we do focusliss on all three axes, but don't apply the results. just for comparison. |
69 |
06:58 |
mars |
focusliss z |
124 |
45 |
-0.3, -0.5, -0.03 |
0.44 |
Data looks very poor no fit. Would be intersting to reprocess to see what comes out |
70 |
07:05 |
mars |
focusliss y |
124 |
45 |
-0.3, -0.5, -0.03 |
0.44 |
No imbfits. not processd |
71 |
07:11 |
mars |
focusliss z |
130 |
48 |
-0.3, -0.5, -0.03 |
0.44 |
Data looks very poor poor fit. Would be intersting to reprocess to see what |
72 - 75 |
07:21 |
mars |
beammap |
131 |
49 |
-0.3, -0.5, -0.03 |
0.44 |
|
|| 76 || || 3c279 || track || || || || || || 19 Jy @ 2mm