Diff for "NK2015_Oct23" - www.iram.es Main Wiki

Differences between revisions 9 and 10

Describe NK2015_Oct22 here.

NIKA October 23, 2015 / S8

Back to list of day to day logbook of observations

2015-10-23

Following not updated

TAPAS is working properly

Data Repository: /home/nika2/NIKA/Data/run13_X/scan24_X

Goal of the session:

OTF geometry and beam map on Uranus: DONE
check pointing on faint sources (pako pointing f and pointing l): Done pointing l, rta can't reduce pointing f
Secondary calibrators and QSO with various spectral slopes according to iram monitoring: started
Mars again

Scan	UT	Source	Command	Az	El	Pointing X, Y, Focus	Tau225	Comment
12		Uranus	track			0 0 0	0.39	We are not as good as Martino. took us 25 minutes to get the resonances...
13	01h37	Uranus	skydip_DIY			0 0 0		resonances well peaked after the skydip. auto_nika_rta tries to reduce skydip and fails.
14	01h40	Uranus	track	236	44	0 0 0
15	01h40	Uranus	nkpoint b	236	44	0 0 0	0.46	good fit. set pointing 0.3 0.8. FWHM = 14"@1mm, 19"@2mm
16	01h42	Uranus	focustrack z	237	44	0.3, 0.8 , 0.	0.46	not a great fit. set focus -0.42 and do it again.
17	01h48	Uranus	focustrack z	237	44	0.3, 0.8 , -0. 42	0.45	better fit. set focus -0.35
18	01h50	Uranus	focustrack x	239	43	0.3, 0.8 , -0.35	0.46	good fit. set focus -0.32 /dir X . large change, do it again to check
19	01h56	Uranus	focustrack x	239	42	0.3, 0.8 , -0.35	0.46	good fit. set focus /dir X -0.83 Large change !!! try Y and set nsubscan to 9 from scan 21 onward
20	02h03	Uranus	focustrack y	241	41	0.3, 0.8 , -0.35	0.46	good fit. set focus 0.29 /dir Y. large change, do it again to check
21	02h04	Uranus	focustrack y	242	40	0.3, 0.8 , -0.35	0.46	not a good fit, no solution @ 2mm. Do a pointing to check beam shape
22	02h10	Uranus	nkpoint b	243	40	0.3, 0.8 , -0.35	0.46	set pointing -0.5 1, beam is 13" - 18" and looks more circular
23	02h10	Uranus	beammap	243	39	0.3, 0.8 , -0.35	0.46	Scan cancelled, forgot to update pointing before lauching
24-26	02h15	Uranus	beammap	244	36	-0.5, 1.0, -0.35	0.2-0.79	resonances fine at the start of first, second and third scan. tau 225 unstable during map
27	02h	Uranus	nkpoint b	252	20	0.3, 0.8 , -0.35	0.46	check pointing after beammap. set pointing -0.6 -0.3 . beam looks larger. 13" and 20"
28	03h01	Uranus	skydip_DIY	252		-0.6, -0.3, -0.35	0.44	resonances well peaked after the skydip. auto_nika_rta tries to reduce skydip and fails. Uranus getting low, will check focus on 3C84
29	03h08	3C84	track	290	70	-0.6, -0.3, -0.35	0.41
30	03h11	3C84	nkpoint b	290	70	-0.6, -0.3, -0.35	0.41	set pointing 5.9, 0.7. does not look too good, will try point faint
31	03h15	3C84	nkpoint f	290	69	5.9, 0.7, -0.35	0.61	auto_nk_rta cannot reduce the pointing. neglect corrections. try point liss.
32	03h20	3C84	nkpoint l	290	68	5.9, 0.7, -0.35	0.96	set pointing 5.0 1.2. FWHM 12 and 18" will try to focus...
33	03h26	3C84	focustrack z	289	67	5.0, 1.2, -0.35	0.43	tau very unstable... set focus -0.04 set nsubscans to 10
34	03h30	3C84	focustrack z	289	67	5.0, 1.2, -0.04	0.43	tau very unstable... do not help having a good fit without opacity correction set focus 0.00 set subscan to 12
35	03h38	3C84	focustrack x	289	64	5.0, 1.2, -0.00	0.43	set focus -0.77 /dir X opacity variation not helping
36	03h45	3C84	focustrack y	289	64	5.0, 1.2, -0.00	0.43	good fit. set focus 0.13 /dir Y small move since last time redo a point liss to check beam shape.
37	03h52	3C84	nkpoint l	290	61	5.0, 1.2, -0.00	0.42	set pointing 3.7, 1.9. Beam does not look great or is it the source ?
38	03h55	3C84	nkotf radec	290	59	3.7, 1.9, -0.00	0.42	nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 radec FWHM 13", 19" urgh...
39	04:08	W3OH	track	324	49	3.7, 1.9, 0.00	0.49
40	04:09	W3OH	nkpoint b	324	49	3.7, 1.9, 0.00	0.47	set pointing 2.2 1.4
41	04:12	W3OH	nkotf azel	324	49	2.2, 1.4, 0.00	0.46	nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel
42	04:21	GL490	track	322	55	2.2, 1.4, 0.00	0.39
43	04:22	GL490	nkpoint l	322	54	2.2, 1.4, 0.00	0.39	set pointing 2.3 -0.5
44	04:28	GL490	nkotf azel	324	55	2.3, -0.5, 0.00	0.50	nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0716+714 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable)
45	04:39	0716+714	track	366	55	2.3, -0.5, 0.00	0.58
46	04:39	0716+714	nkpoint l	366	55	2.3, -0.5, 0.00	0.43	set pointing 1.6 -1.1
47	04:28	0716+714	nkotf azel	366		1.6, -1.1, 0.00	0.45	nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel . Moving to 0420-014 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable)
48	04:58	0420-014	track	230	38	1.6, -1.1, 0.00	0.39
49	04:59	0420-014	nkpoint l	230	38	1.6, -1.1, 0.00	0.69	set pointing -1.9 -0.1
50	05:03	0420-014	nkotf azel	230		-1.9, -0.1, 0.00	0.38	nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel
51	05:14	0727-115	track	172	40	-1.9, -0.1, 0.00	0.43
52	05:15	0727-115	nkpoint l	172	40	-1.9, -0.1, 0.00	0.43	set pointing 0.2 0.2
53	05:21	0727-115	nkotf azel	172	40	0.2, 0.2, 0.00	0.	nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel

54	05:14	0923+392	track	230	38	1.6, -1.1, 0.00	0.58
55	04:59	0923+392	nkpoint l	230	38	1.6, -1.1, 0.00	0.	set pointing -1.9 -0.1
56	05:03	0923+392	nkotf azel	230		-1.9, -0.1, 0.00	0.	nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel

-  ⇤ ← Revision 9 as of 2015-10-23 05:19:51 → 
  Size: 8606
  Editor: NikaBolometer
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 10 as of 2015-10-23 05:28:53 → ⇥
  Size: 8608
  Editor: NikaBolometer
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 57:
-|| 46       || 04:39  ||  0716+714   || nkpoint l         || 366   || 55    ||  2.3, -0.5, 0.00         || 0.     ||  set pointing 1.6 -1.1                     ||
|| 47       || 04:28  ||  0716+714   || nkotf azel        || 366   ||       ||  1.6, -1.1, 0.00         || 0.     ||  nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel      . Moving to 0420-014 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable)             ||
|| 48       || 04:58  ||  0420-014   || track             || 230   || 38    ||  1.6, -1.1, 0.00         || 0.58     ||                       ||
|| 49       || 04:59  ||  0420-014   || nkpoint l         || 230   || 38    ||  1.6, -1.1, 0.00         || 0.     ||  set pointing -1.9 -0.1                    ||
|| 50       || 05:03  ||  0420-014   || nkotf azel        || 230   ||       ||  -1.9, -0.1, 0.00         || 0.     ||  nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel                  ||
|| 51       || 05:14  ||  0727-115   || track             || 172   || 40    ||  -1.9, -0.1, 0.00         || 0.58     ||                       ||
|| 52       || 05:15  ||  0727-115   || nkpoint l         || 172   || 40    ||  -1.9, -0.1, 0.00         || 0.     ||  set pointing -1.9 -0.1                    ||
|| 53       || 05:  ||  0727-115     || nkotf azel        || 172   || 40      ||  -1.9, -0.1, 0.00         || 0.     ||  nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel                  ||
+|| 46       || 04:39  ||  0716+714   || nkpoint l         || 366   || 55    ||  2.3, -0.5, 0.00         || 0.43     ||  set pointing 1.6 -1.1                     ||
|| 47       || 04:28  ||  0716+714   || nkotf azel        || 366   ||       ||  1.6, -1.1, 0.00         || 0.45     ||  nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel      . Moving to 0420-014 that according to Iram monitoring has a very flat spectrum (even if variable)             ||
|| 48       || 04:58  ||  0420-014   || track             || 230   || 38    ||  1.6, -1.1, 0.00         || 0.39     ||                       ||
|| 49       || 04:59  ||  0420-014   || nkpoint l         || 230   || 38    ||  1.6, -1.1, 0.00         || 0.69     ||  set pointing -1.9 -0.1                    ||
|| 50       || 05:03  ||  0420-014   || nkotf azel        || 230   ||       ||  -1.9, -0.1, 0.00         || 0.38     ||  nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel                  ||
|| 51       || 05:14  ||  0727-115   || track             || 172   || 40    ||  -1.9, -0.1, 0.00         || 0.43     ||                       ||
|| 52       || 05:15  ||  0727-115   || nkpoint l         || 172   || 40    ||  -1.9, -0.1, 0.00         || 0.43     ||  set pointing 0.2 0.2                    ||
|| 53       || 05:21  ||  0727-115   || nkotf azel        || 172   || 40    ||  0.2, 0.2, 0.00           || 0.     ||  nkotf 6 6 0 0 10 36 azel                  ||
 Line 73: