Size: 7081
Comment:
|
← Revision 56 as of 2015-10-16 09:13:49 ⇥
Size: 3165
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
NIKA October 14th, 2015 / S1 | NIKA October 15th, 2015 / S1 |
Line 5: | Line 5: |
== 2015-10-14 == | == 2015-10-15 == |
Line 13: | Line 13: |
For this session Array 3 is not connected. | For this session Array 3 is connected, but still less stable than the others. |
Line 20: | Line 20: |
We updated ini.pako. Remember 1mm difference between the focus of NIKA and the focus of the other IRAM instruments due to the design of the optics (SL). |
|
Line 21: | Line 23: |
.Quick description of the session: beam map.'' | .Quick description of the session: focus tests.'' |
Line 26: | Line 28: |
Line 28: | Line 29: |
|| 118 || 07h14 || Mars || Track point || 123 || 47 || 0,0,0. || 0.25 || Pointing towards Mars. We are using the geometry reduced from yesterday's observation (s20151014s116/17/18) || || 119 || 07h20 || Mars || Pointcross || 123 || 47 || 0,0,0. || 0.25 || Scan not so good. The reference pixel is not centered. || || 120 || 07h23 || Mars || Pointcross || 125 || 48 || 0,0,0. || 0.21 || Ref pix 2022 (1mm) and 830 (2mm) not centered. || || 121 || 07h34 || Mars || Track point || 125 || 48 || 0,0,0. || 0.21 || Restarting PAKO with @ini. Source Mars. Track. || || 122 || 07h36 || Mars || Pointcross || 128 || 50 || 0,0,0. || 0.26 || Pointing problem. Scan pattern seems choppy. Reference pixels not centered. SL checking IMB fits file, nothing particular found. || || 123 || 07h44 || Mars || Pointcross || 131 || 51 || 0,0,0. || 0.14 || Pointing looks better. Martino restarted antenna and elvin in the NIKA control software. || || 124 || 07h48 || Mars || Pointcross || 131 || 51 || -16.6,3.4,0. || 0.14 || Pointing looks better. Wind. || || 125 || 07h52 || Mars || focuslissold || 134 || 52 || -16.6,3.4,0. || 0.14 || CANCELLED: FOC=0.01 resulted in FOC=9.99 || || 126-130 || 07h53 || Mars || focuslissold || 134 || 52 || -16.6,3.4,0. || 0.17 || 1mm focus looks good. Try improving 2mm. || || 131 || 08h01 || Mars || Pointcross || 137 || 54 || -16.6,3.4,-0.3 || 0.12 || || || 132 || 08h07 || Mars || Pointcross || 134 || 52 || -10.,1.6.4,-0.3 || 0.11 || SL: could scan maps be presented in log scale? || || 133 || 08h10 || Mars || Focustrack || 140 || 54 || -9.3,3.5,-0.3 || 0.11 || Axis=Z || || 134-138 || 08h14 || Mars || focuslissold || 141 || 55 || -9.3,3.5,-0.3 || 0.04 || || || 139 || 08h25 || Mars || Beammap (1/3) || 146 || 56 || -9.3,3.5,-0.3 || 0.13 || || || 140 || 08h40 || Mars || Beammap (2/3) || 153 || 58 || -9.3,3.5,-0.3 || 0.1 || || || 141 || 08h57 || Mars || Beammap (3/3) || 160 || 59 || -9.3,3.5,-0.3 || 0.23 || || || 142 || 09h14 || Mars || Pointcross || 167 || 60 || -9.3,3.5,-0.3 || 0.18 || || || 143 || 09h16 || Mars || Focustrack || 169 || 60 || -9.0,5.6,-0.3 || 0.1 || || || 144-148 || 09h20 || Mars || focuslissold || 171 || 60 || -9.0,5.6,-0.3 || 0.2 || (FWHM 1mm) SET FOCUS -0.1 || || 149-153 || 09h27 || Mars || focuslissold || 177 || 60 || -9.0,5.6,-0.1 || 0.1 || Output: (FWHM 1mm) SET FOCUS 0.02. No change implemented. || || 154 || 09h44 || Mars || Beammap (1/3) || 184 || 60 || -9.3,3.5,-0.1 || 0.18 || || || 155 || 10h01 || Mars || Beammap (2/3) || 191 || 60 || -9.3,3.5,-0.1 || 0.17 || || || 156 || 10h17 || Mars || Beammap (3/3) || 199 || 59 || -9.3,3.5,-0.1 || 0.16 || || || 157 || 10h32 || Mars || Pointcross || 206 || 58 || -9.3,3.5,-0.1 || 0.16 || || || 158 || 10h33 || Mars || Ponticross || 207 || 58 || -10.9,4.7,-0.1 || 0.09 || || || 159 || 10h39 || Mars || Focustrack || 209 || 57 || -8.4,2.5,-0.1 || 0.09 || Trying various focus methods in the following scans (track, lissajous, cross) || || 160 || 10h43 || Mars || Pointcross || 210 || 57 || -8.4,2.5,-0.1 || 0.2 || || || 161 || 10h44 || Mars || Focustrack || 211 || 57 || -8.4,2.5,-0.1 || 0.2 || Next: trying focusliss to confirm the focus values || || 162-166 || 10h48 || Mars || focuslissold || 213 || 56 || -8.4,2.5,-0.1 || 0.19 || (FWHM 1mm) SET FOCUS 0.035 || || 167 || 10h55 || Mars || Pointcross || 215 || 56 || -8.4,2.5,-0.1 || 0.19 || Trying various values of the focus in the following scans || || 168 || 10h58 || Mars || Pointcross || 217 || 55 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.19 || || || 169 || 11h01 || Mars || Pointcross || 218 || 55 || -8.4,2.5,0.04 || 0.25 || SET FOCUS 0.035 results in 0.04 || || 170 || 11h02 || Mars || Pointcross || 218 || 55 || -8.4,2.5,-0.2 || 0.25 || || || 171 || 11h04 || Mars || Pointcross || 218 || 55 || -8.4,2.5,-0.1 || 0.19 || || || 172 || 11h06 || Mars || Pointcross || 220 || 54 || -8.4,2.5,0.0 || 0.19 || || || 173 || 11h07 || Mars || Pointcross || 220 || 54 || -8.4,2.5,0.1 || 0.19 || || || 174 || 11h09 || Mars || Pointcross || 221 || 54 || -8.4,2.5,0.2 || 0.23 || Good agreement between values found with focustrack and multiple pointcross (0.06); foccuslissond (0.035) || || 175 || 11h13 || Mars || Pointcross || 221 || 54 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.23 || Focus X dir = -0.2 || || 176 || 11h15 || Mars || Pointcross || 221 || 54 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.15 || Focus X dir = -0.1 || || 177 || 11h17 || Mars || Pointcross || 224 || 53 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.15 || Focus X dir = 0.0 || || 178 || 11h19 || Mars || Pointcross || 224 || 52 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.06 || Focus X dir = 0.1 || || 179 || 11h20 || Mars || Pointcross || 225 || 52 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.06 || Focus X dir = 0.2 || || 180 || 11h22 || Mars || Pointcross || 225 || 52 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.1 || Focus X dir = 0.0 / Focus Y dir = -0.2 || || 181 || 11h24 || Mars || Pointcross || 226 || 52 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.1 || Focus X dir = 0.0 / Focus Y dir = -0.1 || || 182 || 11h25 || Mars || Pointcross || 226 || 51 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.1 || Focus X dir = 0.0 / Focus Y dir = 0.0 || || 183 || 11h || Mars || Pointcross || 225 || 52 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.1 || Focus X dir = 0.0 / Focus Y dir = 0.1 || || 184 || 11h || Mars || Pointcross || 225 || 52 || -8.4,2.5,0.06 || 0.1 || Focus X dir = 0.0 / Focus Y dir = 0.2 || |
|| 100 || 07h12 || Mars || Track point || 124 || 47 || 0,0,0. || 0.14 || Pointing towards Mars. We are using the geometry reduced from yesterday's observation (kidpar_20151015s154_155_156_noskydip.fits) || || 101 || 07h18 || Mars || Pointingcross || 124 || 47 || 0,0,0. || 0.14 || Checking pointing. Problem: All subscans set to 0. But the sze of the file is correct. || || 102 || 07h21 || Mars || Pointingcross || 124 || 47 || 0,0,0. || 0.14 || Checking pointing. Problem: All subscans set to 0. Martino investigating the issue. || || 103 || 07h24 || Mars || Pointingcross || 126 || 48 || 0,0,0. || 0.14 || Checking pointing. Problem: All subscans set to 0. || || 104 || 07h33 || Mars || Pointingcross || 126 || 48 || 0,0,0. || 0.14 || Retrying scan after Martino tweaks codes. Seems to be related to the order in which we launch programs of the NIKA control software. || || 105 || 07h38 || Mars || Pointingcross || 129 || 50 || -8.7,3.3,0. || 0.11 || Correcting pointing. Comparing with the beam model (SL), the 1mm profile seems consistent with the scan and the diffraction produced by the tetrapod. || || 106 || 07h43 || Mars || Focustrack || 132 || 51 || -8.7,3.3,0. || 0.19 || Axis=Z. At 1mm: z=-0.028+/-0.009. At 2mm: z=0.058+/-0.042. Close enough, keeping focus Z=0.0 || || 107 || 07h54 || Mars || Focustrack || 136 || 52 || -8.7,3.3,0. || 0.17 || Axis=X. At 1mm: x=-0.079+/-0.021. At 2mm: x=0.188+/-0.289. || || 108 || 07h58 || Mars || Focustrack || 136 || 52 || -8.7,3.3,0. || 0.17 || Axis=Y. At 1mm: y=-0.018+/-0.037. At 2mm: y=0.044+/-0.67. Difficult to do better in Y. || || 107 || 07h54 || Mars || Focustrack || 136 || 52 || -8.7,3.3,0. || 0.17 || Axis=X. X focus = 0.1. At 1mm: x=-0.079+/-0.021. At 2mm: x=0.188+/-0.289. || |
NIKA October 15th, 2015 / S1
Back to list of day to day logbook of observations
2015-10-15
Following not updated
.Cryostat Temperature: 170mK cooling down slowly Arrays status tonight: full 2mm array - 1-3 Hz noise; 2 feed lines on 1mm array 3-5Hz noise Modulation frequency: 10kHz 1mm, 5kHz 2mm For this session Array 3 is connected, but still less stable than the others. Opacity is measured with the new taumeter at 225 GHz Nasmyth offsets : 0, 0 Set Focus : we start at 0.0 mm We updated ini.pako. Remember 1mm difference between the focus of NIKA and the focus of the other IRAM instruments due to the design of the optics (SL). Quick description of the session: focus tests.
Data Repository: /home/nika2/NIKA/Data/run13_X/scan24_X
Scan |
UT |
Source |
Command |
Az |
El |
Pointing X, Y, Focus |
Tau225 |
Comment |
100 |
07h12 |
Mars |
Track point |
124 |
47 |
0,0,0. |
0.14 |
Pointing towards Mars. We are using the geometry reduced from yesterday's observation (kidpar_20151015s154_155_156_noskydip.fits) |
101 |
07h18 |
Mars |
Pointingcross |
124 |
47 |
0,0,0. |
0.14 |
Checking pointing. Problem: All subscans set to 0. But the sze of the file is correct. |
102 |
07h21 |
Mars |
Pointingcross |
124 |
47 |
0,0,0. |
0.14 |
Checking pointing. Problem: All subscans set to 0. Martino investigating the issue. |
103 |
07h24 |
Mars |
Pointingcross |
126 |
48 |
0,0,0. |
0.14 |
Checking pointing. Problem: All subscans set to 0. |
104 |
07h33 |
Mars |
Pointingcross |
126 |
48 |
0,0,0. |
0.14 |
Retrying scan after Martino tweaks codes. Seems to be related to the order in which we launch programs of the NIKA control software. |
105 |
07h38 |
Mars |
Pointingcross |
129 |
50 |
-8.7,3.3,0. |
0.11 |
Correcting pointing. Comparing with the beam model (SL), the 1mm profile seems consistent with the scan and the diffraction produced by the tetrapod. |
106 |
07h43 |
Mars |
Focustrack |
132 |
51 |
-8.7,3.3,0. |
0.19 |
Axis=Z. At 1mm: z=-0.028+/-0.009. At 2mm: z=0.058+/-0.042. Close enough, keeping focus Z=0.0 |
107 |
07h54 |
Mars |
Focustrack |
136 |
52 |
-8.7,3.3,0. |
0.17 |
Axis=X. At 1mm: x=-0.079+/-0.021. At 2mm: x=0.188+/-0.289. |
108 |
07h58 |
Mars |
Focustrack |
136 |
52 |
-8.7,3.3,0. |
0.17 |
Axis=Y. At 1mm: y=-0.018+/-0.037. At 2mm: y=0.044+/-0.67. Difficult to do better in Y. |
107 |
07h54 |
Mars |
Focustrack |
136 |
52 |
-8.7,3.3,0. |
0.17 |
Axis=X. X focus = 0.1. At 1mm: x=-0.079+/-0.021. At 2mm: x=0.188+/-0.289. |