Size: 1033
Comment:
|
← Revision 29 as of 2015-10-16 10:52:37 ⇥
Size: 4351
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
NIKA October 10th, 2015 / S1 | NIKA October 10th, 2015 / S3 |
Line 22: | Line 22: |
Data Repository: /home/nika2/NIKA/Data/run13_X/ (to check..) | Data Repository: /home/nika2/NIKA/Data/run13_X/scan24_X |
Line 27: | Line 27: |
||149-153 || 12h20m || Mars || FocusLissold || 240 || 46 || 0,0,-0.8 || 0.7, increasing... :-( || checking focus, centered at -0.8, steps 0.6 || || 154 || 12h30m || Mars || OTFgeom || 243 || 43 || 0,0,-0.8 || 0.7 || we make a 'focus by hand' procedure, making at each step a small OTFgeom (NO lissajous!) so that then we can make maps pixel by pixel, less affected by the geometry (that we still do not know!)! first step: focus -0.8 || || 155 || 12h38m || Mars || OTFgeom || 245 || 42 || 0,0,-1.3: focus -1.3 || 0.7 || 'focus by hand' procedure, second step: focus -1.3 || || 156 || 12h44m || Mars || OTFgeom || 246 || 41 || 0,0,-0.3: focus -0.3 || 0.7 || 'focus by hand' procedure, third step: focus -0.3. It looks like we improve in this direction -> we try to go to positive focus... || || 157 || 12h52m || Mars || OTFgeom || 248 || 39.5 || 0,0,+0.2: focus +0.2 || 0.7 || 'focus by hand' procedure, forth step: focus +0.2 || || 158 || 13h04m || Mars || OTFgeom || 248 || 38 || 0,0,+0.7: focus +0.7 || 0.6 (? :-) ?) || 'focus by hand' procedure, 5th step: focus +0.7 || || 159 || 13h13m || Mars || Pointcross 'mode b' (=bright source) || 252 || 35 || 0,0,+0.2 || 0.6 || OPTIMAL FOCUS seems to be at +0.2 so we set this value for the time being. || || 160 || 13h17m || Mars || Pointcross 'b' || 252 || 35 || -17,+30,+0.2 || 0.6 || Following the previous cross we set the pointing to -17 +30. Now checking that it's ok. || || 161 || 13h21m || Mars || Pointcross 'b' || 254 || 34 || +20,-20,+0.2 || 0.6 || Checks on pointing... || || 162 || 13h25m || Mars || Pointcross 'b' || 255 || 33 || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 || 0.7 || Changed reference pixel, new checks on pointing || || 163 || 13h27m || Mars || Pointcross 'b' || 255 || 32.5 || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 || 0.7 || Remaking same cross, previous one gave bad results (clouds?) || || 164 || 13h29m || Mars || Focusliss || 256 || 31 || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 (focus -1.2 to +2.2) || 0.8 || Trying a focusliss now that we should be around the good value and better pointed || || 166 || 13h40m || DIY || SKYDIP || 257 || -- || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 || 0.8 || || || 169 || 13h40m || DIY || SKYDIP || 107 || -- || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 || 0.8 || || || 171 || 14h06m || G34.3 || Pointcross 'b' || 110 || 27 || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 || 0.8 || new compression of data file with 'moyennage' taken with mac35 || || 173 || 14h11m || DIY || SKYDIP || 110 || -- || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 || > 0.8 || strange results || || 175 || 14h41m || DIY || SKYDIP (other script) || 110 || -- || -4.6,-0.8,+0.2 || > 0.8 || using skydip.pako script (the one to be used) || || 177 || 14h50m || G34.3 || OTFgeom || 119 || 35 || 0,0,+0.2: focus +0.2 || 0.7 || 240x240arcsec || |
NIKA October 10th, 2015 / S3
Back to list of day to day logbook of observations
2015-10-10
Following not updated
.Cryostat Temperature: 170mK cooling down slowly Modulation frequency: 10kHz 1mm, 5kHz 2mm Opacity is measured with the new taumeter at 225 GHz Nasmyth offsets : 0, 0 Set Focus : we start at -2mm (not at all optimised, first task is try to improve on this!) Quick description of the session: Test the Pako sequences and data flows.
Data Repository: /home/nika2/NIKA/Data/run13_X/scan24_X
Scan |
UT |
Source |
Command |
Az |
El |
Pointing X, Y, Focus |
Tau225 |
Comment |
144-148 |
12h10m |
Mars |
240 |
46 |
0,0,-2 |
0.7, increasing... |
checking focus, centered at -2, steps 0.6 |
|
149-153 |
12h20m |
Mars |
240 |
46 |
0,0,-0.8 |
0.7, increasing... |
checking focus, centered at -0.8, steps 0.6 |
|
154 |
12h30m |
Mars |
OTFgeom |
243 |
43 |
0,0,-0.8 |
0.7 |
we make a 'focus by hand' procedure, making at each step a small OTFgeom (NO lissajous!) so that then we can make maps pixel by pixel, less affected by the geometry (that we still do not know!)! first step: focus -0.8 |
155 |
12h38m |
Mars |
OTFgeom |
245 |
42 |
0,0,-1.3: focus -1.3 |
0.7 |
'focus by hand' procedure, second step: focus -1.3 |
156 |
12h44m |
Mars |
OTFgeom |
246 |
41 |
0,0,-0.3: focus -0.3 |
0.7 |
'focus by hand' procedure, third step: focus -0.3. It looks like we improve in this direction -> we try to go to positive focus... |
157 |
12h52m |
Mars |
OTFgeom |
248 |
39.5 |
0,0,+0.2: focus +0.2 |
0.7 |
'focus by hand' procedure, forth step: focus +0.2 |
158 |
13h04m |
Mars |
OTFgeom |
248 |
38 |
0,0,+0.7: focus +0.7 |
0.6 (? |
'focus by hand' procedure, 5th step: focus +0.7 |
159 |
13h13m |
Mars |
Pointcross 'mode b' (=bright source) |
252 |
35 |
0,0,+0.2 |
0.6 |
OPTIMAL FOCUS seems to be at +0.2 so we set this value for the time being. |
160 |
13h17m |
Mars |
Pointcross 'b' |
252 |
35 |
-17,+30,+0.2 |
0.6 |
Following the previous cross we set the pointing to -17 +30. Now checking that it's ok. |
161 |
13h21m |
Mars |
Pointcross 'b' |
254 |
34 |
+20,-20,+0.2 |
0.6 |
Checks on pointing... |
162 |
13h25m |
Mars |
Pointcross 'b' |
255 |
33 |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 |
0.7 |
Changed reference pixel, new checks on pointing |
163 |
13h27m |
Mars |
Pointcross 'b' |
255 |
32.5 |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 |
0.7 |
Remaking same cross, previous one gave bad results (clouds?) |
164 |
13h29m |
Mars |
Focusliss |
256 |
31 |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 (focus -1.2 to +2.2) |
0.8 |
Trying a focusliss now that we should be around the good value and better pointed |
166 |
13h40m |
DIY |
SKYDIP |
257 |
-- |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 |
0.8 |
|
169 |
13h40m |
DIY |
SKYDIP |
107 |
-- |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 |
0.8 |
|
171 |
14h06m |
G34.3 |
Pointcross 'b' |
110 |
27 |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 |
0.8 |
new compression of data file with 'moyennage' taken with mac35 |
173 |
14h11m |
DIY |
SKYDIP |
110 |
-- |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 |
> 0.8 |
strange results |
175 |
14h41m |
DIY |
SKYDIP (other script) |
110 |
-- |
-4.6,-0.8,+0.2 |
> 0.8 |
using skydip.pako script (the one to be used) |
177 |
14h50m |
G34.3 |
OTFgeom |
119 |
35 |
0,0,+0.2: focus +0.2 |
0.7 |
240x240arcsec |