Differences between revisions 7 and 8
Revision 7 as of 2014-01-27 16:19:44
Size: 4569
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 2014-01-27 16:25:39
Size: 5628
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 40: Line 40:
|| 203 || 16h15 || Uranus || pointliss || -6.7 -0.7, -1.3 || say pointing '''X lateral focus +4mm (vertical)''' ''to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss''|| || 203 || 16h15 || Uranus || pointliss || -6.7 -0.7, -1.3 || say pointing '''X lateral focus +4mm (vertical)''' ''to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss''||
|| 204 || 16h20 || Uranus || pointliss || -6.7 -0.7, -1.3 || say pointing '''X lateral focus -4mm (vertical)''' ''to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss''||
|| 205 || 16h || Uranus || cross || -6.7 -0.7, -1.3 || say pointing '''X lateral focus -4mm (vertical)''' ''to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses''||
|| 206 || 16h || Uranus || pointliss || -6.7 -0.7, -1.3 || say pointing '''X lateral focus -4mm (vertical)''' ''to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss''||
|| 207 || 16h25 || Uranus || cross || -6.7 -0.7, -1.3 || say pointing '''X lateral focus -4mm (vertical)''' ''to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses''||
|| 208 || 16h || Uranus || pointliss || -6.7 -0.7, -1.3 || say pointing '''X lateral focus -4mm (vertical)''' ''to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss''||

NIKA, January 27th, 2014 / S8

Back to list of day to day logbook of observations

2014-01-27

  • TAPAS database, will be completed on Monday. Continue with manual log below.

Programm for today. Yesterday we did a nice session with the polariser, and did a full pointing session that should allow to give us a pointing model for NIKA valid for the next runs. It's the last night, we will not be able to recover all the time lost due to weather conditions the previous days. We need to choose priorities from the program. I (SL) propose the following:

  • Focus and Beam maps on Uranus.
  • Scan of MWC349 before it set (Lissajou + small OTF).
  • Try 3D focus, 2 beam maps per position = 2x7x12 ~3 hours. + 2 more beam maps on best focus.
  • Photometric calibration on primary and secondary calibrators with Lissajous scans and small OTF maps (Az El and/or few RA DEC for testing). As primary: Ceres ? (need check visibility plot). Some secondary that will have not already set: W3OH, CepA, NGC7538.
  • Check geom on CygA (and possibly M82 again).
  • (if enough time: Test various OTF Zig Zag orientations; in particular Ra Dec scan on NGC891).
  • (if enough time: Deep integration).
  • Keep last 1.5 hour to mount again the polariser, and observe again 3C84, KL (ORI) and Crab or CasA.

Remark for NIKA staff: Good data are on RAW_X10

OFFSET -37 -30 /sys Nasmyth => select detector 494 as reference

Scan

UT

Source

Command

Pointing X,Y, Focus

Comment

184

15h07

Uranus

track

0 0, -0.8

OFFSET -37 -30 /sys Nasmyth.

185

15h12

Uranus

cross

0 0, -0.8

pointing -3.7 -0.1

186

15h15

Uranus

focusp

-3.7 -0.1, -0.8

focus -1.4 @ 1mm, -1.05 @ 2mm, we put -1.3

187

15h20

Uranus

cross

-3.7 -0.1, -1.3

say pointing -2.5 -4.1

188

15h23

Uranus

otfgeom

-2.5 -4.1, -1.3

quicklook process => distribution of FWHM pretty wide => wind probably already too strong for a reliable otfgeometry 3D focus

189

15h42

Uranus

pointliss

-2.5 -4.1, -1.3

say pointing -6.1 -1.8 => indeed moving... wind.

190-194

15h45

Uranus

focusliss

-2.5 -4.1, -1.3

say focus -1.3 @ 1mm (0.9 @ 2mm) to not loose too much time, but try to get a 1st idea of effect of lacteral focus, try 3D focus on shortest maps: Lissajous & crosses

195

15h55

Uranus

cross

-2.5 -4.1, -1.3

say pointing -4.9 -3.3 to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

196

15h58

Uranus

cross

-4.9 -3.3, -2

say pointing -4.9 -2.1 to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

197

16h00

Uranus

cross

-4.9 -3.3, -0.6

say pointing -6.7 -0.7 to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

198

16h00

Uranus

pointliss

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing -5.1 -1.5 X lateral focus +4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss

199

16h05

Uranus

cross

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing -4.4 -0.9 X lateral focus +4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

200

16h08

Uranus

pointliss

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing ...can't process data X lateral focus +4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss

201

16h10

Uranus

cross

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing -3.2 -2.9 X lateral was back to 0 to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

202

16h13

Uranus

cross

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing -3.8 -0.2 X lateral focus +4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

203

16h15

Uranus

pointliss

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing X lateral focus +4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss

204

16h20

Uranus

pointliss

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing X lateral focus -4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss

205

16h

Uranus

cross

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing X lateral focus -4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

206

16h

Uranus

pointliss

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing X lateral focus -4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss

207

16h25

Uranus

cross

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing X lateral focus -4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other crosses

208

16h

Uranus

pointliss

-6.7 -0.7, -1.3

say pointing X lateral focus -4mm (vertical) to do offline: analyse the beam for comparison with other pointliss

NK2014_Jan27 (last edited 2014-01-27 23:05:38 by NikaBolometer)