| Size: 1587 Comment:  | Size: 6637 Comment:  | 
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. | 
| Line 9: | Line 9: | 
| Modulation frequency: 8kHz 1mm, 4kHz 2mm Opacity is measurd with the new taumeter at 225 GHz | |
| Line 22: | Line 25: | 
| ||     143  ||  16h34 ||  Mars      || otf_geom        || 281 || 20.6 ||     0.0 0.0 -2.4   ||  0.85     ||   || || 144 || 17h09 || 3c279 || track || 130 || 33.6 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.828 || Expected flux: 11-20 Jy || || 145 || 17h15 || 3c279 || otf_geom || 131.4 || 34.0 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.822 || Expected flux: 11-20 Jy || | ||     143  ||  16h34 ||  Mars      || otf_geom        || 281 || 20.6 ||     0.0 0.0 -2.4   ||  0.85     || still tests and tunes on arrays (after scan), some resonances lost, auto tune was not on, find again by hand...   || || 144 || 17h09 || 3C279 || track || 130 || 33.6 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.828 || Expected flux: 11-20 Jy || || 145 || 17h15 || 3C279 || otf_geom || 131.4 || 34.0 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.822 || looks like some resonances still lost, do manual sweep to get them back while otf being processed and analyzed || || 146 || 17h45 || 3C279 || otf_geom || 134 || 36 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.814 || All resonances are found. Auto tuning on from now on|| || 147 || 17h57 || 3C279 || pointing_cross|| 140 || 39 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.814 || to test cross scan and file while RA & NP process the otf to determine the ref pix|| || 148 || 18h01 || 3C279 || pointing_lissajous|| 140 || 39 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.814 || to test cross scan and file while RA & NP process the otf to determine the ref pix ; cryostat warming up a bit|| || 149 || 18h02 || 3C279 || pointing_lissajous|| 140 || 39 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.814 || Testing small 1.5'x1.5' lissajous map|| || 150 || 18h04 || 3C279 || pointing_lissajous|| 149 || 42 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.814 || || || 151 || 18h16 || 3C279 || faintSource_lissajous|| 149 || 42 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 || Same lissajous curve parameter as above, longer integration (to be used typically on faint sources)|| || 152 || 18h31 || Az=150 || diydown (skydip)|| 150 || 65 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 ||Track - testing skydip with Track at starting elevation to let the KID be tuned|| || 153 || 18h32 || Az=150 || diydown (skydip)|| 150 || 65 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 ||Track - testing skydip with Track at starting elevation to let the KID be tuned|| || 154 || 18h33 || Az=150 || diydown (skydip)|| 150 || 65 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 ||diy command failed at the first commanded elevation was 120 degrees!! My mistake, the original script was wrongly modified|| || 155 || 18h35 || Az=180 || diyup (skydip)|| 180 || 20 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 ||testing skydip with Track at starting elevation to let the KID be tuned|| || 156 || 18h38 || Az=180 || diyup (skydip)|| 180 || 20 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 || Actual skydip -- KIDs have lost the resonances...|| || 157 || 18h38 || Az=180 || diyup (skydip)|| 180 || 20 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 || Track to tune the KIDs at 20 degrees elevation, but telescope go back to 10 degrees after|| || 158 || 19h03 || Az=180, el=20 || diyup (skydip)|| 180 || 20 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 || Track to tune the KIDs at 20 degrees elevation (specifying a source at el.=20)|| || 159 || 19h10 || Az=180, el=20 || diyup (skydip)|| 180 || 20 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.76 || seems to have worked ok|| || 160 || 19h19 || 3C279 || track || 169 || 46 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.752 || Reference pixel is 434 and 28 (offline team NP, RA, AC, ) || || 161 || 19h26 || 3C279 || pointing_cross || 172 || 47 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.760 || Try to find a pointing correction || || 162 || 19h30 || 3C279 || pointing_cross || 172 || 47 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.760 || Try to find a pointing correction || || 163 || 19h41 || 3C279 || pointing lissajou || 175 || 47 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.760 || Try to find a pointing correction || || 164 || 19h50 || 3C279 || pointing lissajou || 182 || 47 || 0.0 0.0 -2.4 || 0.760 || Try to find a pointing correction || || 165 || 20h05 || 3C279 || pointing cross || 185.5 || 46.9 || +25 0.0 -2.4 || 0.760 || Try to find a pointing correction || || 166 || 20h05 || 3C279 || pointing cross || 185.5 || 46.9 || +25 +25 -2.4 || 0.760 || Try to find a pointing correction ; pointing requested too big (>50) ; go try radio alignment even if sky not great, screws: Corridor side = 4.12, Wall side = 4.02 || || 167 || 20h49 || 3C279 || pointing cross || 201 || 44.8 || +25 +25 -2.4 || 0.760 || radio alignment was actually doable, screws: C = 3.70 => gain ~1kHz, W = 3.02 => gain <0.5 kHz ; maybe problem at the end of the scan || || 167 || 20h49 || 3C279 || pointing cross || 201 || 44.8 || +25 +25 -2.4 || 0.760 || => radio alignment get better background & better pointing (now pointing offset requested are in range) || || 169 || 21h10 || 3C279 || pointing cross || 207 || 43.0 || -5 -15 -2.4 || 0.760 || || || 170 || 21h12 || 3C279 || pointing cross || 207 || 43.0 || -20 -10 -2.4 || 0.750 || set pointing variation is very big => axis of rotation is far from our ref pixel ; check other pixels => 181 and 505 seem || || 171 || 21h26 || 3C279 || pointing cross || 212 || 41.3 || -20 -10 -2.4 || 0.750 || we center on pixels 181, 505 || | 
NIKA November 2012 S1
Back to list of day to day logbook of observations
2013-06-11
- Cryostat Temperature: 216mK (naturally set by settings of 3He circulation [no heater] trying to mitigate oscillation due to leak).
- Arrays status tonight: pixels 2mm - xxx noise; XX pixels 1mm xxx noise (to be determined)
Modulation frequency: 8kHz 1mm, 4kHz 2mm
Opacity is measurd with the new taumeter at 225 GHz
Nasmyth offsets : 0, 0
Set pointing : 0, 0
Set Focus : -2.40 mm
- Quick description of the session: Test the Pako sequences and data flows.
| Scan | UT | Source | Command | Az | El | Pointing X, Y, Focus | Tau225 | Comment | 
| 140 | ~ 16h | Mars | Track | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | closed window, test data tranfert | 
| 141 | 16h05 | Mars | Cross | 277.687 | 26.626 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.862 | opened window, test arrays frequencies | 
| 142 | 16h30 | Mars | OTF_geom | 277 | 26.6 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.85 | Juan put Nasmyth offset to 0 in pointing model; this is our starting point before the session ; tuning during the scan | 
| 143 | 16h34 | Mars | otf_geom | 281 | 20.6 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.85 | still tests and tunes on arrays (after scan), some resonances lost, auto tune was not on, find again by hand... | 
| 144 | 17h09 | 3C279 | track | 130 | 33.6 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.828 | Expected flux: 11-20 Jy | 
| 145 | 17h15 | 3C279 | otf_geom | 131.4 | 34.0 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.822 | looks like some resonances still lost, do manual sweep to get them back while otf being processed and analyzed | 
| 146 | 17h45 | 3C279 | otf_geom | 134 | 36 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.814 | All resonances are found. Auto tuning on from now on | 
| 147 | 17h57 | 3C279 | pointing_cross | 140 | 39 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.814 | to test cross scan and file while RA & NP process the otf to determine the ref pix | 
| 148 | 18h01 | 3C279 | pointing_lissajous | 140 | 39 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.814 | to test cross scan and file while RA & NP process the otf to determine the ref pix ; cryostat warming up a bit | 
| 149 | 18h02 | 3C279 | pointing_lissajous | 140 | 39 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.814 | Testing small 1.5'x1.5' lissajous map | 
| 150 | 18h04 | 3C279 | pointing_lissajous | 149 | 42 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.814 | 
 | 
| 151 | 18h16 | 3C279 | faintSource_lissajous | 149 | 42 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | Same lissajous curve parameter as above, longer integration (to be used typically on faint sources) | 
| 152 | 18h31 | Az=150 | diydown (skydip) | 150 | 65 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | Track - testing skydip with Track at starting elevation to let the KID be tuned | 
| 153 | 18h32 | Az=150 | diydown (skydip) | 150 | 65 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | Track - testing skydip with Track at starting elevation to let the KID be tuned | 
| 154 | 18h33 | Az=150 | diydown (skydip) | 150 | 65 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | diy command failed at the first commanded elevation was 120 degrees!! My mistake, the original script was wrongly modified | 
| 155 | 18h35 | Az=180 | diyup (skydip) | 180 | 20 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | testing skydip with Track at starting elevation to let the KID be tuned | 
| 156 | 18h38 | Az=180 | diyup (skydip) | 180 | 20 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | Actual skydip -- KIDs have lost the resonances... | 
| 157 | 18h38 | Az=180 | diyup (skydip) | 180 | 20 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | Track to tune the KIDs at 20 degrees elevation, but telescope go back to 10 degrees after | 
| 158 | 19h03 | Az=180, el=20 | diyup (skydip) | 180 | 20 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | Track to tune the KIDs at 20 degrees elevation (specifying a source at el.=20) | 
| 159 | 19h10 | Az=180, el=20 | diyup (skydip) | 180 | 20 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.76 | seems to have worked ok | 
| 160 | 19h19 | 3C279 | track | 169 | 46 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.752 | Reference pixel is 434 and 28 (offline team NP, RA, AC, ) | 
| 161 | 19h26 | 3C279 | pointing_cross | 172 | 47 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.760 | Try to find a pointing correction | 
| 162 | 19h30 | 3C279 | pointing_cross | 172 | 47 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.760 | Try to find a pointing correction | 
| 163 | 19h41 | 3C279 | pointing lissajou | 175 | 47 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.760 | Try to find a pointing correction | 
| 164 | 19h50 | 3C279 | pointing lissajou | 182 | 47 | 0.0 0.0 -2.4 | 0.760 | Try to find a pointing correction | 
| 165 | 20h05 | 3C279 | pointing cross | 185.5 | 46.9 | +25 0.0 -2.4 | 0.760 | Try to find a pointing correction | 
| 166 | 20h05 | 3C279 | pointing cross | 185.5 | 46.9 | +25 +25 -2.4 | 0.760 | Try to find a pointing correction ; pointing requested too big (>50) ; go try radio alignment even if sky not great, screws: Corridor side = 4.12, Wall side = 4.02 | 
| 167 | 20h49 | 3C279 | pointing cross | 201 | 44.8 | +25 +25 -2.4 | 0.760 | radio alignment was actually doable, screws: C = 3.70 => gain ~1kHz, W = 3.02 => gain <0.5 kHz ; maybe problem at the end of the scan | 
| 167 | 20h49 | 3C279 | pointing cross | 201 | 44.8 | +25 +25 -2.4 | 0.760 | => radio alignment get better background & better pointing (now pointing offset requested are in range) | 
| 169 | 21h10 | 3C279 | pointing cross | 207 | 43.0 | -5 -15 -2.4 | 0.760 | 
 | 
| 170 | 21h12 | 3C279 | pointing cross | 207 | 43.0 | -20 -10 -2.4 | 0.750 | set pointing variation is very big => axis of rotation is far from our ref pixel ; check other pixels => 181 and 505 seem | 
| 171 | 21h26 | 3C279 | pointing cross | 212 | 41.3 | -20 -10 -2.4 | 0.750 | we center on pixels 181, 505 | 
