Differences between revisions 2 and 5 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2013-06-15 12:58:26
Size: 480
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2013-06-18 01:20:04
Size: 649
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
 .Warning: the data are apparently not well calibrated yet, so the plots shown below might not be correct for now. == Results ==
 .The spectrum map is defined by index = log(Map_140/Map_240)/alog(140.0/240.0). We can clearly see a change in the spectral index in the source. This is confirmed by the correlation plot which shows the values in the pixel of the 240 GHz map as a function of the value of the corresponding 140GHz map.
Line 5: Line 6:
 || {{attachment:1mm_map_m82.png}} || {{attachment:2mm_map_m82.png}} ||
 || [[attachment:1mm_map_m82.pdf]] || [[attachment:2mm_map_m82.pdf]] ||
 || {{attachment:1mm_map_m82.png}} || {{attachment:2mm_map_m82.png}} || {{attachment:spectre.png}} ||
 || [[attachment:1mm_map_m82.pdf]] || [[attachment:2mm_map_m82.pdf]] || [[attachment:spectre.pdf]] ||
Line 8: Line 9:
 || {{attachment:correlation.png||width=550,height=400}} ||  || {{attachment:correlation.png||width=850,height=700}} ||
Line 10: Line 11:

 || {{attachment:spectre.png||width=550,height=400}} ||
 || [[attachment:spectre.pdf]] ||

M82 spectrum

Results

  • The spectrum map is defined by index = log(Map_140/Map_240)/alog(140.0/240.0). We can clearly see a change in the spectral index in the source. This is confirmed by the correlation plot which shows the values in the pixel of the 240 GHz map as a function of the value of the corresponding 140GHz map.

M87 (last edited 2013-06-18 02:34:16 by NikaBolometer)