Differences between revisions 14 and 93 (spanning 79 versions)
Revision 14 as of 2016-02-26 13:32:25
Size: 3289
Comment:
Revision 93 as of 2016-03-11 16:48:34
Size: 7246
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
Line 5: Line 6:
<<TableOfContents(3)>> <<TableOfContents(4)>>
Line 13: Line 14:
 Aim of the focus campaign : characterize how the focus evolves accross NIKA2 field of view '''''Aim:''''' characterizing the variations of the best focus across NIKA2 field of view. Several "focus z sessions" were done in NIKA2 Run3. However, the outermost regions of the array, where the axial focus is expected to show the largest variations w.r.t. the center of the array (-24.5, 3.4), were mainly probed. Here, the objective is to characterize the curvature of the focal plane and to confirm its flatness in the inner part of the arrays.
Line 15: Line 16:
'''''Method:''''' the optimal axial focus is estimated from 5 x 1 arcmin square OTF scans at 5 different focus around the initial focus set in PAKO. In each map produced using NK_RTA, the main beam is fitted using a 2D Gaussian function. Two optimal z focus estimates are fitted using NK_FOCUS_LISS_OLD, which resorts to a polynomial POLY_FIT function: the focus z that maximises the flux at the beam peak and the focus z that minimizes the main beam FWHM, the former being usually more precise.

'''''Analysis:''''' Several focus z campaigns were done during NIKA2 run 3, and were analysed. For information, a compilation of the results is available in the NIKA2 private page in [[]].
'''''Method:''''' We suggest to explore 2 perpendicular diameters in Nasmyth offset bins from 30 arcsec to 1 arcmin. The list of Nasmyth offsets is given at the end of the page ([[#offsetlist|jump to the offset list]]). For each Nasmyth offset location, the optimal axial focus is estimated from 5 x 1 arcmin square OTF scans at 5 different focus around the initial focus set in PAKO using the command "focusOTF". In each map produced using NK_RTA, the main beam is fitted using a 2D Gaussian function. Two optimal z focus estimates are fitted using NK_FOCUS_LISS_OLD, which resorts to a polynomial POLY_FIT function: the focus z that maximises the flux at the beam peak and the focus z that minimizes the main beam FWHM, the former being usually more precise.
Line 20: Line 19:
''''referent person: Laurence Perotto (laurence.perotto@lpsc.in2p3.fr), Jean-François Lestrade'''' '''''Analysis:''''' Several focus z campaigns were done during NIKA2 run 3, and were analysed. For information, a compilation of the results is available in the NIKA2 private page in [[http://www.iram.fr/wiki/nika2/index.php/Focus_variation_across_the_focal_plane]].
Line 23: Line 22:
=== 1./ source selection === '''referent person: Laurence Perotto (laurence.perotto@lpsc.in2p3.fr), Jean-François Lestrade'''
Line 25: Line 24:
Choose a bright point source of several Jy (e.g. 3C273)' -----

=== Commands sequence ===


Below the detailled sequence of commands to be run is given.


==== 1./ source selection ====

Choose a bright point source of several Jy (e.g. 3C84, 3C273, 3C279, 1156+295, ...)
NB: Although 3C286 has also been used during Run 3, it is not bright enough (0.3 Jy) to yield very good focus measurements.
Line 33: Line 43:
=== 2./ pointing correction === ==== 2./ pointing correction ====
Line 35: Line 45:
pointing lissajous seems more reliable as the reference pixel is currently (25/01) off-centered Reminder: There are 2 methods, the pointing lissajous resorts to a small lissajous around the source, whereas the pointing cross does 2 perpendicular scans across the source. The pointing lissajous is often more reliable when the reference pixel is off-centered in Nasmyth coordinates (whenever the pointing model is not implemented after a proper pointing session).
Line 39: Line 49:
}}}
or
{{{
Line 42: Line 55:
in case of poor fit with a lissajous, try resorting to the 'common_mode_kids_out' method" in case of poor fit with a lissajous, try resorting to the 'common_mode_kids_out' method" by running
Line 48: Line 61:
=== 3./ best focus at the array center f_0 === ==== 3./ best focus at the array center f_0 ====
Line 51: Line 64:
     PAKO>offset 0. 0. \sys nasmyth      PAKO>offset -24.5, 3.4 /sys nasmyth
Line 61: Line 74:
     IDL> nk_rta, 'scan', /nas      IDL> nk_rta, '20160303s1', /nas, /xyguess, rmax_keep=30, radius=35
Line 67: Line 81:
     IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160125s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas      IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160303s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas, /xyguess, rmax_keep=30, get_focus_error=1, imzoom=1
Line 70: Line 84:
''NB: if the optimal focus value is far from zero (abs(f_0) > 0.3), reiterate in ingesting the optimal focus value as the center focus f asked by @focusOTF''
   
Line 71: Line 87:
=== 4./ best focus across the field-of-view f_{off-center} === ==== 4./ best focus across the field-of-view f_{off-center} ====
Line 82: Line 98:
      IDL> nk_rta, 'scan', /nas, /xyguess, /largemap       IDL> nk_rta, '20160304s1', /nas, /xyguess, /largemap, rmax_keep=30, radius=35
Line 88: Line 104:
      IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160125s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas, /xyguess       IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160304s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas, /xyguess, rmax_keep=30, get_focus_error=1, imzoom=1
Line 92: Line 108:
the list of nasmyth coordinates to be explored can be read on the A2 printed sheet
In case the focus@1mm and the focus@2mm are very discrepant, the focus exploration bin (-0.8, +0.8) may be not sufficient to fit simultaneously f_1 and f_2. Relaunch using f=<f_2>, the focus@2mm value from the previous focus campaign measurements:"
the list of nasmyth coordinates to be explored can be read on the A2 printed sheet.

NB:
In case the focus@1mm and the focus@2mm are very discrepant, the focus exploration bin (-0.8, +0.8) may be not sufficient to fit simultaneously f_1 and f_2. Relaunch using f=<f_2>, the focus@2mm value from the previous focus campaign measurements:"
Line 101: Line 118:
=== 5./ monitoring of the focus temporal drift === ==== 5./ monitoring of the focus temporal drift ====
Line 103: Line 120:
Since we are interested in the difference between f_0 and various f_{off-center}, f_0 should be regularly checked (every point or every other point depending on its stability) Since we are interested in the difference between f_0 and various f_{off-center}, f_0 should be regularly checked (every few points depending on its stability).
Line 105: Line 122:
re-iterate 3/ from time to time re-iterate 3/ after 4 focus z measurements at off-centered Nasmyth offsets.
Line 107: Line 124:


=== List of Nasmyth offsets (version 18 points) ===
<<Anchor(offsetlist)>>

||<tablewidth="55%" #AAAAFF :> Info ||<#AAAAFF :>Nasmyth offsets||<#AAAAFF :> A1 kid numdet ||
||<rowspan=3 :> first half of the main diameter||<)> 81.2, -104.6||<)> 4584||
||<)> 43.8, -69.2||<)> 4252||
||<)> 25.9, -39.1||<)> 3941||
||<rowbgcolor="#FFFFAA" :>center of the array||<)> -24.5, 3.4||<)> 3385||
||<rowspan=4 :> second half of the main diameter||<)> -53.3, 41.5||<)> 2827||
||<)> -89.7, 68.1||<)> 2571||
||<)> -118.5, 106.7||<)> 2166||
||<)> -143.6, 125.8||<)> 1938||
||<rowspan=6 :> 2nd diameter ||<)> -120.2, -89.8||<)> 4016||
||<)> -79.6, -55.4||<)> 3847||
||<)> -54.0, -39.0||<)> 3769||
||<)> 25.2, 49.7||<)> 2979||
||<)> 57.9, 81.7||<)> 2738||
||<)> 82.3, 106.5||<)> 2512||
||<rowspan=4 :> circle ||<)> -123.7, 3.8||<)> 3068||
||<)> 63.4, 14.1||<)> 3548||
||<)> -22.3, -84.7||<)> 4202||
||<)> -28.6, 107.4||<)> 2335||

{{attachment:nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016_v2.png|nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016_v2.png|width=600 height=600}}


=== OLD List of Nasmyth offsets (version 22 points) ===

<span style="color: gray>
||<tablewidth="55%" #AAAAFF :> Info ||<#AAAAFF :>Nasmyth offsets||<#AAAAFF :> A1 kid numdet ||
||<rowspan=4 :> first half of the main diameter||<)> 92.9, -112.2||<)> 4591||
||<)> 79.3, -95.7||<)> 4494||
||<)> 53.3, -67.0||<)> 4251||
||<)> 25.9, -39.1||<)> 3941||
||<rowbgcolor="#FFFFAA" :>center of the array||<)> -24.5, 3.4||<)> 3385||
||<rowspan=5 :> second half of the main diameter||<)> -53.3, 41.5||<)> 2827||
||<)> -89.7, 68.1||<)> 2571||
||<)> -104.8, 89.9||<)> 2344||
||<)> -130.4, 113.7||<)> 2015||
||<)> -155.3, 133.1||<)> 1871||
||<rowspan=12 :> other points ||<)> 38.6, 78.1||<)> 2740||
||<)> -79.6, -55.4||<)> 3847||
||<)> 63.4, 14.1||<)> 3548||
||<)> -123.7, 3.8||<)> 3068||
||<)> -28.6, 107.4||<)> 2335||
||<)> -22.3, -84.7||<)> 4202||
||<)> -135.7, -104.3||<)> 4173||
||<)> -110.9, -87.6||<)> 4021||
||<)> -54.0, -39.0||<)> 3769||
||<)> 25.2, 49.7||<)> 2979||
||<)> 65.1, 93.8||<)> 2664||
||<)> 90.0, 118.1||<)> 2497||
</span>

{{attachment:nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016.png|nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016.png|width=600 height=600}}

[[attachment:nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016.eps]]

Observation campaign description

Detailled description of specific observing sessions are given here.

Back to the NIKA2 Run4 page


Focus z campaign

Aim: characterizing the variations of the best focus across NIKA2 field of view. Several "focus z sessions" were done in NIKA2 Run3. However, the outermost regions of the array, where the axial focus is expected to show the largest variations w.r.t. the center of the array (-24.5, 3.4), were mainly probed. Here, the objective is to characterize the curvature of the focal plane and to confirm its flatness in the inner part of the arrays.

Method: We suggest to explore 2 perpendicular diameters in Nasmyth offset bins from 30 arcsec to 1 arcmin. The list of Nasmyth offsets is given at the end of the page (jump to the offset list). For each Nasmyth offset location, the optimal axial focus is estimated from 5 x 1 arcmin square OTF scans at 5 different focus around the initial focus set in PAKO using the command "focusOTF". In each map produced using NK_RTA, the main beam is fitted using a 2D Gaussian function. Two optimal z focus estimates are fitted using NK_FOCUS_LISS_OLD, which resorts to a polynomial POLY_FIT function: the focus z that maximises the flux at the beam peak and the focus z that minimizes the main beam FWHM, the former being usually more precise.

Analysis: Several focus z campaigns were done during NIKA2 run 3, and were analysed. For information, a compilation of the results is available in the NIKA2 private page in http://www.iram.fr/wiki/nika2/index.php/Focus_variation_across_the_focal_plane.

referent person: Laurence Perotto (laurence.perotto@lpsc.in2p3.fr), Jean-François Lestrade


Commands sequence

Below the detailled sequence of commands to be run is given.

1./ source selection

Choose a bright point source of several Jy (e.g. 3C84, 3C273, 3C279, 1156+295, ...) NB: Although 3C286 has also been used during Run 3, it is not bright enough (0.3 Jy) to yield very good focus measurements.

      PAKO> source 3C273
      PAKO> track
      PAKO> start

2./ pointing correction

Reminder: There are 2 methods, the pointing lissajous resorts to a small lissajous around the source, whereas the pointing cross does 2 perpendicular scans across the source. The pointing lissajous is often more reliable when the reference pixel is off-centered in Nasmyth coordinates (whenever the pointing model is not implemented after a proper pointing session).

      PAKO>@nkpoint l

or

      PAKO>@nkpoint b

in case of poor fit with a lissajous, try resorting to the 'common_mode_kids_out' method" by running IDL> nk_rta, 'scan', /mask

      PAKO>set pointing xx yy

3./ best focus at the array center f_0

     PAKO>offset -24.5, 3.4 /sys nasmyth
     PAKO>@focusOTF
enter 0 as the center focus f.

It will run 5 scans at focus f-0.8; f-0.4; f; f+0.4; f+0.8

Analyse each scan individualy using:

     IDL> nk_rta, '20160303s1', /nas, /xyguess, rmax_keep=30, radius=35

once the 5 scans are reduced, run (for ex.):

     IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160303s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas, /xyguess, rmax_keep=30, get_focus_error=1, imzoom=1

NB: if the optimal focus value is far from zero (abs(f_0) > 0.3), reiterate in ingesting the optimal focus value as the center focus f asked by @focusOTF

4./ best focus across the field-of-view f_{off-center}

      PAKO>offset xoff yoff \sys nasmyth
      PAKO>@focusOTF
enter 0 as the center focus f.

Analyse each scan individualy using:

      IDL> nk_rta, '20160304s1', /nas, /xyguess, /largemap, rmax_keep=30, radius=35

once the 5 scans are reduced, run (for ex.):

      IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160304s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas, /xyguess, rmax_keep=30, get_focus_error=1, imzoom=1

Please keep track of the (xoff, yoff) in TAPAS for easier analysis of the campaign results the list of nasmyth coordinates to be explored can be read on the A2 printed sheet.

NB: In case the focus@1mm and the focus@2mm are very discrepant, the focus exploration bin (-0.8, +0.8) may be not sufficient to fit simultaneously f_1 and f_2. Relaunch using f=<f_2>, the focus@2mm value from the previous focus campaign measurements:"

       PAKO>@focusOTF

enter <f_2> as the center focus f.

5./ monitoring of the focus temporal drift

Since we are interested in the difference between f_0 and various f_{off-center}, f_0 should be regularly checked (every few points depending on its stability).

re-iterate 3/ after 4 focus z measurements at off-centered Nasmyth offsets.

List of Nasmyth offsets (version 18 points)

Info

Nasmyth offsets

A1 kid numdet

first half of the main diameter

81.2, -104.6

4584

43.8, -69.2

4252

25.9, -39.1

3941

center of the array

-24.5, 3.4

3385

second half of the main diameter

-53.3, 41.5

2827

-89.7, 68.1

2571

-118.5, 106.7

2166

-143.6, 125.8

1938

2nd diameter

-120.2, -89.8

4016

-79.6, -55.4

3847

-54.0, -39.0

3769

25.2, 49.7

2979

57.9, 81.7

2738

82.3, 106.5

2512

circle

-123.7, 3.8

3068

63.4, 14.1

3548

-22.3, -84.7

4202

-28.6, 107.4

2335

nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016_v2.png

OLD List of Nasmyth offsets (version 22 points)

<span style="color: gray>

Info

Nasmyth offsets

A1 kid numdet

first half of the main diameter

92.9, -112.2

4591

79.3, -95.7

4494

53.3, -67.0

4251

25.9, -39.1

3941

center of the array

-24.5, 3.4

3385

second half of the main diameter

-53.3, 41.5

2827

-89.7, 68.1

2571

-104.8, 89.9

2344

-130.4, 113.7

2015

-155.3, 133.1

1871

other points

38.6, 78.1

2740

-79.6, -55.4

3847

63.4, 14.1

3548

-123.7, 3.8

3068

-28.6, 107.4

2335

-22.3, -84.7

4202

-135.7, -104.3

4173

-110.9, -87.6

4021

-54.0, -39.0

3769

25.2, 49.7

2979

65.1, 93.8

2664

90.0, 118.1

2497

</span>

nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016.png

nasmyth_offset_focus_session_march2016.eps

HowtosNika2Run4 (last edited 2016-03-13 08:42:04 by NikaBolometer)