Differences between revisions 10 and 14 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 10 as of 2016-02-26 13:19:50
Size: 2483
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2016-02-26 13:32:25
Size: 3289
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
2 focus campaigns were conducted on the 24th and 25th of January '''''Method:''''' the optimal axial focus is estimated from 5 x 1 arcmin square OTF scans at 5 different focus around the initial focus set in PAKO. In each map produced using NK_RTA, the main beam is fitted using a 2D Gaussian function. Two optimal z focus estimates are fitted using NK_FOCUS_LISS_OLD, which resorts to a polynomial POLY_FIT function: the focus z that maximises the flux at the beam peak and the focus z that minimizes the main beam FWHM, the former being usually more precise.
Line 17: Line 17:
referent person: Jean-Francois Lestrade, Laurence Perotto '''''Analysis:''''' Several focus z campaigns were done during NIKA2 run 3, and were analysed. For information, a compilation of the results is available in the NIKA2 private page in [[]].
Line 20: Line 20:
## source selection: ''''referent person: Laurence Perotto (laurence.perotto@lpsc.in2p3.fr), Jean-François Lestrade''''


=== 1./ source selection ===
Line 30: Line 33:
# pointing correction === 2./ pointing correction ===
Line 33: Line 36:
       {{{
Line 36: Line 40:
}}}
Line 39: Line 44:
{{{
      PAKO>set pointing xx yy
}}}
Line 40: Line 48:
      PAKO>set pointing xx yy === 3./ best focus at the array center f_0 ===
Line 42: Line 50:

# best focus at the array center f_0:
 
{{{
Line 47: Line 53:
enter 0 as the center focus f.
}}}
Line 48: Line 56:
enter 0 as the center focus f. It will run 5 scans at focus f-0.8; f-0.4; f; f+0.4; f+0.8
analyse each scan individualy using:
It will run 5 scans at focus f-0.8; f-0.4; f; f+0.4; f+0.8
Line 51: Line 58:
Analyse each scan individualy using:

{{{
Line 52: Line 62:
}}}
Line 55: Line 66:
{{{
Line 56: Line 68:
}}}
 
Line 57: Line 71:
=== 4./ best focus across the field-of-view f_{off-center} ===
Line 58: Line 73:
# best focus across the field-of-view f_{off-center}:
 
{{{
Line 62: Line 76:
enter 0 as the center focus f.
}}}
Line 63: Line 79:
enter 0 as the center focus f. Analyse each scan individualy using:
Line 65: Line 81:
analyse each scan individualy using:
{{{
Line 68: Line 83:
}}}
Line 71: Line 87:
{{{
Line 72: Line 89:
}}}
Line 77: Line 95:
{{{
Line 80: Line 99:
  }}}
Line 82: Line 101:
# monitoring of the focus temporal drift' === 5./ monitoring of the focus temporal drift ===

Observation campaign description

Detailled description of specific observing sessions are given here.

Back to the NIKA2 Run4 page


Focus z campaign

  • Aim of the focus campaign : characterize how the focus evolves accross NIKA2 field of view

Method: the optimal axial focus is estimated from 5 x 1 arcmin square OTF scans at 5 different focus around the initial focus set in PAKO. In each map produced using NK_RTA, the main beam is fitted using a 2D Gaussian function. Two optimal z focus estimates are fitted using NK_FOCUS_LISS_OLD, which resorts to a polynomial POLY_FIT function: the focus z that maximises the flux at the beam peak and the focus z that minimizes the main beam FWHM, the former being usually more precise.

Analysis: Several focus z campaigns were done during NIKA2 run 3, and were analysed. For information, a compilation of the results is available in the NIKA2 private page in [[]].

'referent person: Laurence Perotto (laurence.perotto@lpsc.in2p3.fr), Jean-François Lestrade'

1./ source selection

Choose a bright point source of several Jy (e.g. 3C273)'

      PAKO> source 3C273
      PAKO> track
      PAKO> start

2./ pointing correction

pointing lissajous seems more reliable as the reference pixel is currently (25/01) off-centered

      PAKO>@nkpoint l
      PAKO>@nkpoint b

in case of poor fit with a lissajous, try resorting to the 'common_mode_kids_out' method" IDL> nk_rta, 'scan', /mask

      PAKO>set pointing xx yy

3./ best focus at the array center f_0

     PAKO>offset 0. 0. \sys nasmyth
     PAKO>@focusOTF
enter 0 as the center focus f.

It will run 5 scans at focus f-0.8; f-0.4; f; f+0.4; f+0.8

Analyse each scan individualy using:

     IDL> nk_rta, 'scan', /nas

once the 5 scans are reduced, run (for ex.):

     IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160125s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas

4./ best focus across the field-of-view f_{off-center}

      PAKO>offset xoff yoff \sys nasmyth
      PAKO>@focusOTF
enter 0 as the center focus f.

Analyse each scan individualy using:

      IDL> nk_rta, 'scan', /nas, /xyguess, /largemap

once the 5 scans are reduced, run (for ex.):

      IDL> nk_focus_liss_old, '20160125s'+strtrim([1,2,3,4,5], 2), /nas, /xyguess

Please keep track of the (xoff, yoff) in TAPAS for easier analysis of the campaign results the list of nasmyth coordinates to be explored can be read on the A2 printed sheet In case the focus@1mm and the focus@2mm are very discrepant, the focus exploration bin (-0.8, +0.8) may be not sufficient to fit simultaneously f_1 and f_2. Relaunch using f=<f_2>, the focus@2mm value from the previous focus campaign measurements:"

       PAKO>@focusOTF

enter <f_2> as the center focus f.

5./ monitoring of the focus temporal drift

Since we are interested in the difference between f_0 and various f_{off-center}, f_0 should be regularly checked (every point or every other point depending on its stability)

re-iterate 3/ from time to time

HowtosNika2Run4 (last edited 2016-03-13 08:42:04 by NikaBolometer)