Size: 874
Comment:
|
← Revision 12 as of 2025-08-18 10:36:14 ⇥
Size: 1549
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
[Nika2Run75|Back to the NIKA2 Run 75 main page]] <<BR>> | [[Nika2Run75|Back to the NIKA2 Run 75 main page]] <<BR>> |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* Check that run #75 are activated in DAQ *.ini files and for the creation of imbFITS files (new & old systems). | |
Line 5: | Line 4: |
Goals of NIKA2 run 75 (Re-commissioning of NIKA2+, fourth part): | === Preliminaries === |
Line 7: | Line 6: |
* First of all, check the focus offsets in total power after the cooldown. Over run #72 focus corrections of Ar2/1 were self-consistent and that of Ar3 was +0.3-0.4 mm displaced. On run #73, we obtained offsets of about +0.3 mm for Ar2/1 and +0.6 mm for Ar2/3. Depending on these tests, we would establish appropriate compromise values. | * Check the Cryo run 87 (run #75 of NIKA2) is activated in DAQ *.ini files, as well as for the creation of imbFITS files (t22). |
Line 9: | Line 8: |
* Beam maps to produce new DAFs/kidpars with new reference KID (Ar2, central KID). | * Check that imbFITS files are being produced by both the new and old systems. |
Line 11: | Line 10: |
* Calib_1scan maps on flux standards in total power & polarimetry. In the latter case, get focus correction from Ar1-Ar3 average. | * Data obtained in the previous run (#74) were successfully reprocessed using the PIIC/DAFs in force (/sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs). So, the default PIIC/DAFs mentioned in the document linked below are very likely to work. Best focus offset of Ar1 wrt. Ar2 is ~ +0.5 mm, and ~ +0.2 mm for Ar3 wrt. Ar1 (see plot below; linear fits are weighted by inverse rms values). Check these focus offsets. |
Line 13: | Line 12: |
* Small maps on point-like & extended (auxiliary) bright sources. | {{attachment:reprocessed_foci_run74.png||height="500"}} * No changes in the pointing model since last March. === Goals of NIKA2 run 75 (Re-commissioning of NIKA2+, fourth part) === * See [[https://publicwiki.iram.es/PrioritiesRun75|Priorities, goals, wishes, suggestions, etc. etc.]]. * AB: Considering the circumstances in which this campaign will be carried out (heterodyne pool), a practical approach would be to obtain (i) a pair of beam maps (@ 202503/beammap1scan99sub a; 25 min) per array with optimized Z foci (first priority), and (ii) obtaining the deep field (~5h in total) on one of the sources to be selected (use @ 202503/generic_otf_radec; 12.4 min). If there is more time, continue with the defocused beam maps (0.2 mm steps). Some @calib_1scan maps (4 min each) on primary/secondary flux calibrators would be desirable. |
Back to the NIKA2 Run 75 main page
Preliminaries
- Check the Cryo run 87 (run #75 of NIKA2) is activated in DAQ *.ini files, as well as for the creation of imbFITS files (t22).
- Check that imbFITS files are being produced by both the new and old systems.
- Data obtained in the previous run (#74) were successfully reprocessed using the PIIC/DAFs in force (/sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs). So, the default PIIC/DAFs mentioned in the document linked below are very likely to work. Best focus offset of Ar1 wrt. Ar2 is ~ +0.5 mm, and ~ +0.2 mm for Ar3 wrt. Ar1 (see plot below; linear fits are weighted by inverse rms values). Check these focus offsets.
- No changes in the pointing model since last March.
Goals of NIKA2 run 75 (Re-commissioning of NIKA2+, fourth part)
- AB: Considering the circumstances in which this campaign will be carried out (heterodyne pool), a practical approach would be to obtain (i) a pair of beam maps (@ 202503/beammap1scan99sub a; 25 min) per array with optimized Z foci (first priority), and (ii) obtaining the deep field (~5h in total) on one of the sources to be selected (use @ 202503/generic_otf_radec; 12.4 min). If there is more time, continue with the defocused beam maps (0.2 mm steps). Some @calib_1scan maps (4 min each) on primary/secondary flux calibrators would be desirable.