|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2016-02-24 10:41:37
Size: 5544
Comment:
|
Size: 5686
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| ___Continue tests on the instrument with same arrays since run 1 and same NIKEL boards as run 3.___ | __Continue tests on the instrument with same arrays since run 1 and same NIKEL boards as run 3.__ |
| Line 10: | Line 10: |
| * Run 3 show a pretty nice Array 1 in terms of stability, and | * Understand difference between array 1, which is pretty stable, and array 3, which is much less stable: both arrays being identical, electronic boards are possible suspect: exchange boards and do beam maps. * Understand the beams is still a priority: previous runs show at 2mm the dichroic deformation is dominant; lab measures show an asymmetry on |
| Line 12: | Line 13: |
| * Understand the beams is still a priority: previous runs show at 2mm the dichroic deformation is dominant; lab measures show an asymmetry on * Beside will provide data to monitor kid stability, photometry, sensitivity and time line features, and get statistics on these parameters |
* Beside will provide data to monitor kid stability, photometry, sensitivity and time line features, and get statistics on these parameters |
NIKA2 run #4 March 2016
Goals of the run
Continue tests on the instrument with same arrays since run 1 and same NIKEL boards as run 3.
Check data & flags consistency & synchronization. Raw, FIT for Pipeline, IMBFIT.
Test synchronization of NIKA2 samples with telescope coordinates: some hints in previous data of possible systematic error (e.i. using PPS time maybe not sufficient) => to test this possibility do scans (beam maps) at various speed and and scan pattern (not only zig zag, but also only increasing azimuth, only increasing azimuth etc.; need to edit PaKo scripts !)
- Understand difference between array 1, which is pretty stable, and array 3, which is much less stable: both arrays being identical, electronic boards are possible suspect: exchange boards and do beam maps.
- Understand the beams is still a priority: previous runs show at 2mm the dichroic deformation is dominant; lab measures show an asymmetry on
* Beside will provide data to monitor kid stability, photometry, sensitivity and time line features, and get statistics on these parameters
- Skydips
- A session of KIDs working point optimization
- Continue observations of many calibrators to monitor our sensitivity and photometry
- Depending on the completion of previous items, go for more advanced characterizations, like extended features and polarization
The detailled characterization plan established for run 1 is still valid, and ongoing: http://www.iram.fr/wiki/nika2/index.php/NIKA2_Run1_30m_CharacterizationPlan A more summarized and concise version will be written as soon as possible (SL).
Preparation of the run
Telescope Schedule weeks 0 & 1 Telescope Schedule weeks 2 & 3
Staff of the run: table of the nights spent at the observatory for the NIKA2 collaboration members participating to the run (T means Tuesday, S means Saturday, first night with NIKA2 staff is Tuesday 29 September, last night is Monday 9 November, 1 stands for night scheduled at the telescope, p stands for possible extension in case of problem with the cryostat). In italic: not at the telescope but on watch for possible remote help or intervention on the software and/or remote control.
People\Date |
T12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
S16 |
17 |
18 |
T19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
S23 |
24 |
25 |
T26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
S30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
A.Monfardini |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O.Bourrion |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.Calvo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
A.Benoit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.Catalano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.Perotto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.Comis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
A.Ritacco |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
S.Leclercq |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.Ponthieu |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.Ruppin |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.F.Lestrade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bracco |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
J.Soler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-X.Désert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.Beelen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.Macias-P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sleep at obs. |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
N. Billot (AOD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Sievers (AOD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Program
- before 12/01: Start cool down.
- 12/01 - 13/01: Installation of the new NIKEL boards. Receiver cabin available few hours per day.
- 14/01 - 19/01: Cooling down, test system. Receiver cabin available few hours per day.
- 19/01 - 26/01: Testing NIKA2 on sky; 24h/day of telescope time.
- 27/01 - 02/02: Testing NIKA2 on sky; 17h/day of telescope time..