Differences between revisions 9 and 24 (spanning 15 versions)
Revision 9 as of 2017-04-06 12:17:31
Size: 3397
Comment:
Revision 24 as of 2017-09-11 11:28:37
Size: 3425
Editor: ritaccoa
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
<<TableOfContents(5)>>
Line 9: Line 7:
Continue the commissioning (see previous runs for references):<<BR>> __Continue the commissioning (see previous runs for references):__<<BR>>
Line 15: Line 13:
 * Continue all necessary calibration scnas (pointing, focus, skydips...)  * Continue all necessary calibration scans (pointing, focus, skydips...)
Line 20: Line 18:
Science verification:<<BR>>
 * Projects proposed by volunteers from the collaboration.
__Science verification:__<<BR>>
 * '''Projects proposed by volunteers from the collaboration: in priority M99 (Ruth), PSZ2 G144.83+25.11 (Florian), GJ526 (Jean-François)'''.
Line 24: Line 22:

Line 29: Line 25:
Line 35: Line 30:
April:
Line 37: Line 32:
|| Confirmed travels:||
Line 45: Line 39:
||<rowbgcolor="#ddcc55"> Sleep at obs. (*)|| 0|| 5 || 5 || 5 || 6 || 5 || 5 || 5 || 0 || ||<rowbgcolor="#ddcc55"> Sleep at obs. (*)|| 0|| 5 || 5 || 6 || 6 || 5 || 5 || 5 || 0 ||

NIKA2 run #10 April 2017

Back to the NIKA2 run 10 page

Goals of the run

Continue the commissioning (see previous runs for references):

  • Check the alignment has not changed (with last run's pointing model, pointing offsets should be typically <10" for all coordinates).

  • As previous runs perform again the scans which are the most useful for commissioning: stack more beam maps at various focus (Z,Y,X), various elevation and various scan orientations.

  • In particular we lack statistics on beam maps focus sequences starting at best average focus (not best central focus !).
  • Continue to monitor regularly secondary calibrators to check stability of the instrument gains.
  • Continue any necessary work on detectors working point, electronics, acquisition, synchronizations, data files... monitoring possible effects on the beam maps.
  • Continue all necessary calibration scans (pointing, focus, skydips...)
  • Depending on time and observing conditions: few polarization observations to test polar system is still OK (not commissioning it) ; few scans with external calibrator to test the system and get better data than previously to continue developing this solution (not commissioning it).

See all the goals listed and described in run 5 and related links for more details.

Science verification:

  • Projects proposed by volunteers from the collaboration: in priority M99 (Ruth), PSZ2 G144.83+25.11 (Florian), GJ526 (Jean-François).

  • Repeat Pluto observations that where done last run (this is a very good case given the various sources present in the field from last run maps).
  • Secondary calibrators.

Schedule of the run

All the persons who will participate to the run must appear in the table below; each one must have informed at least Samuel, Esther (for the rooms in Granada and at the telescope), Beatrice (for the ones who fly on IRAM funds, see NIKA2 travel rules).

Staff of the run: table of the nights spent at the observatory for the NIKA2 collaboration members participating to the run (T = Tuesday, S = Saturday, 1 = night scheduled at the telescope, g = night in Granada office).

People\Date

17

T18

19

20

21

S22

23

24

T25

J. Macias-Perez

g

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

g?

A. Rigby

g

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

g?

H. Aussel

g

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

g?

S. Leclercq

g

1

1

1

1

C. Clark

g

1

1

1

1

1

g?

L. Perotto

g

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

g

A. Ritacco (AOD)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

Sleep at obs. (*)

0

5

5

6

6

5

5

5

0

(*) Count persons from the NIKA collaboration not from IRAM Granada.

IRAM's Astronomer on Duty.

GoalsPrepStaffNika2Run10 (last edited 2017-09-11 11:28:37 by ritaccoa)