Differences between revisions 4 and 5
⇤ ← Revision 4 as of 2013-06-15 01:30:22 →
Size: 1475
Editor: NikaBolometer
Comment:
← Revision 5 as of 2013-06-15 01:36:44 → ⇥
Size: 1528
Editor: NikaBolometer
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
 .Since the opacity is very high, the crosses are not always sufficient for focus estimations. We also use short lissajous scans that we perform at different focus in order to estimate the best value.
 .We show here an offline processing of such lissajous maps with theis profiles.		  .Since the opacity is very high for the Run6, the crosses are not always sufficient for focus estimations. Therefore, we also use short lissajous scans that we perform at different focuses in order to estimate the best value.
 .We show here an offline processing of such lissajous maps with theis profiles for 5 values of the focus.

Focus with lissajous scans using the quasar 3C279

  • Since the opacity is very high for the Run6, the crosses are not always sufficient for focus estimations. Therefore, we also use short lissajous scans that we perform at different focuses in order to estimate the best value.
  • We show here an offline processing of such lissajous maps with theis profiles for 5 values of the focus.

1mm

  • 1mm_map_1.png

    1mm_map_2.png

    1mm_map_3.png

    1mm_map_3.png

    1mm_map_4.png

    1mm_pro_1.png

    1mm_pro_2.png

    1mm_pro_3.png

    1mm_pro_3.png

    1mm_pro_4.png

2mm

  • 2mm_map_1.png

    2mm_map_2.png

    2mm_map_3.png

    2mm_map_3.png

    2mm_map_4.png

    2mm_pro_1.png

    2mm_pro_2.png

    2mm_pro_3.png

    2mm_pro_3.png

    2mm_pro_4.png

Focus lissajous (last edited 2013-06-15 16:46:40 by NikaBolometer)