Differences between revisions 9 and 11 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 9 as of 2025-07-13 05:23:17
Size: 6002
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2025-07-13 11:32:15
Size: 6391
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 41: Line 41:
 * First task is to have reliable focus corrections per array. Pointing on 1741-038 (1.61 Jy @ 1 mm, 10/7/2025: SMA). First problem: if we adopt MOPSIC_DAFS=/local/users/flexible/reduce/dafs_bck/dafs_local_tmp_run73_ar2 for PIIC-QL, a message of synchro problem/corrupted file appear. Everything goes fine with that in the case of Ar1/Ar3. 2mm-PIIC monitors restarted using MOPSIC_DAFS=/sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs: now it works. We'll continue on this.  * The first task is to get reliable focus corrections per array. Pointing on 1741-038 (1.61 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 10/7/2025: SMA). An issue arises: adopting MOPSIC_DAFS=/local/users/flexible/reduce/dafs_bck/dafs_local_tmp_run73_ar2 for PIIC-QL as established above, a message ''synchro problem or corrupted file'' appears. Everything goes fine with that in the case of Ar1/Ar3. 2mm-PIIC monitors restarted using MOPSIC_DAFS=/sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs: now it works. We continue on this. On the other hand, it was not possible to activate the creation of imbfits files with the old system. Albrecht is investigating possible issues with the NCS libraries.
Line 43: Line 43:
 * Quite stable atmosphere: p2p vars. in the second focus sequence of the session are ~ 2, 3, and 5 Jy/beam (ar1, ar2, ar3).  * Very stable atmosphere: p2p vars. in the second focus sequence of the session are ~ 2, 3, and 5 Jy/beam (ar1, ar2, ar3). Quiet residual background in the QL maps.
Line 45: Line 45:
00:50 (LT): Changed to 1749+096 (2.33 Jy @ 1 mm, 09/7/2025: SMA) for new focus corrections. 00:50 (LT): Changed to 1749+096 (2.33 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 09/7/2025: SMA) for new focus corrections.
Line 50: Line 50:
|| 274 - 277 || 1741-038 || 49.1 || 1.16 || 1.62 || 1.94* || Much better. Pivot should be Ar2 focus correction + 0.6 mm; not so good correction for Ar3 || || 274 - 277 || 1741-038 || 49.1 || 1.16 || 1.62 || 1.94* || Much better. Pivot should be Ar2 focus correction + 0.6 mm to have reasonable fits for all arrays per single focus sequence; not so good correction for Ar3 ||
Line 59: Line 59:
|| 292 || MWC349 || 66.3 || focus opt. ar2 (1.0) ||
|| 293 || MWC349 || 67.3 || focus opt. ar1/3 (1.7) ||
|| 294 || NGC7027 || 61.9 || focus opt. ar1/3 (1.7) ||
|| 294
|| NGC7027 || 62.9 || focus opt. ar2 (1.0) ||
|| 294
|| CRL2688 || 64.3 || focus opt. ar2 (1.0) ||
|| 294
|| CRL2688 || 65.3 || focus opt. ar1/3 (1.7) ||
|| 292 || MWC349 || 66.3 || focus opt. ar2 ||
|| 293 || MWC349 || 67.3 || focus opt. ar1/3 ||
|| 294 || NGC7027 || 61.9 || focus opt. ar1/3 ||
|| 295
|| NGC7027 || 62.9 || focus opt. ar2 ||
|| 296
|| CRL2688 || 64.3 || focus opt. ar2 ||
|| 297
|| CRL2688 || 65.3 || focus opt. ar1/3 ||
Line 66: Line 66:
02:13 (LT): Starting a second trial of flux calibrations on secondary standards after a new focus correction: 02:13 (LT): Starting a second trial of flux calibrations on secondary standards after a new focus correction on 1749+096:
Line 70: Line 70:
|| 5 || MWC349 || 77.7 || focus opt. ar2 (1.0) ||
|| 6 || MWC349 || 78.6 || focus opt. ar1/3 (1.7) ||
|| 7 || NGC7027 || 72.9 || focus opt. ar1/3 (1.7) ||
|| 8 || NGC7027 || 73.9 || focus opt. ar2 (1.0) ||
|| 9 || CRL2688 || 76.2 || focus opt. ar2 (1.0) ||
|| 10 || CRL2688 || 76.3 || focus opt. ar1/3 (1.7) ||
|| 5 || MWC349 || 77.7 || focus opt. ar2 ||
|| 6 || MWC349 || 78.6 || focus opt. ar1/3 ||
|| 7 || NGC7027 || 72.9 || focus opt. ar1/3 ||
|| 8 || NGC7027 || 73.9 || focus opt. ar2 ||
|| 9 || CRL2688 || 76.2 || focus opt. ar2 ||
|| 10 || CRL2688 || 76.3 || focus opt. ar1/3 ||
Line 77: Line 77:
Calib_1scan maps with no apparent problems. Comparable to those obtained last April, for instance.
Line 78: Line 79:
'''AB: completion of the last part in progress'''
Line 82: Line 84:
|| 18 - 22 || 2251+158 (3C454) || 49.8 || 0.97 || * || * || No fitting for ar1, bad fitting for ar3||
|| 27 - 31 || 2251+158 (3C454) || 55.41 || 1.17 || * || * || No fitting for ar1, bad fitting for ar3||
|| 33 - 37 || 2230+114 || 57.7 || 1.15 || * || * || No fitting for ar1, bad fitting for ar3||
|| 39 - 42 || 2230+114 || 59.4 || 1.17 || 1.60 || 1.83 || Finally a reasonable focus correction ||
|| 50 - 54 || Neptune || 47.8 || 1.24 || * || * || No fitting for ar1, bad fitting for ar3||
|| 60 - 64 || 2134+004 || 46.6 || 1.45 || * || * || Marginal fitting for ar1/3; changing to the appropriate pivot. Repeating.||
|| 65 - 69 || 2134+004 || 44.9 || 1.55 || 2.0 || * || Marginal fitting for ar3. Not reliable fitting. ||
|| 72 - 76 || 2134+004 || 59.4 || 1.55 || 2.0 || * || Marginal fitting for ar3. Not reliable fitting. ||

|| 18 - 22 || 2251+158 (3C454) || 49.8 || 0.97 || * || * || No fitting for ar1, bad fit for ar3||
|| 27 - 31 || 2251+158 (3C454) || 55.41 || 1.17 || * || * || No fitting for ar1, bad fit for ar3||
|| 33 - 37 || 2230+114 || 57.7 || 1.15 || * || * || No fitting for ar1, bad fit for ar3||
|| 39 - 42 || 2230+114 || 59.4 || 1.17 || 1.60 || 1.83 || Finally, a reasonable focus correction ||
|| 50 - 54 || Neptune || 47.8 || 1.24 || * || * || No fit for ar1, bad fit for ar3||
|| 60 - 64 || 2134+004 || 46.6 || 1.45 || * || * || Marginal fit for ar1/3; changing to the appropriate pivot. Repeating.||
|| 65 - 69 || 2134+004 || 44.9 || 1.55 || 2.0 || * || Marginal fit for ar3. Unreliable fits. ||
|| 72 - 76 || 2134+004 || 59.4 || 1.55 || 2.0 || * || Marginal fit for ar3. Unreliable fits. ||

Back to the NIKA2 Run 74 main page

NIKA2 Re-Commissioning (3rd. attempt)

NIKA2 run 74, Cryo run 86

Infos about the PIIC DAFs for the PIIC monitor

According to the results obtained from processing data of June 2025 NIKA2 re-commissioning given here, DAFs RPP scheme used during run 73 is kept. Therefore, two different sets of DAFs for Ar1+3 and for Ar2 are used. In practice:

  • Ar2
    • open a terminal, go to the QL directory
    • gagpiic
    • export MOPSIC_DAFS=/local/users/flexible/reduce/dafs_bck/dafs_local_tmp_run73_ar2
    • start the Ar2 monitor (pf)
    • repeat in another terminal for the Ar2 monitor(m)
  • Ar1 and Ar3
    • open a new terminal, go to the QL directory
    • gagpiic
    • echo $MOPSIC_DAFS -> check that it says /sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs

    • if not, then set it to that directory
    • proceed normally with the Ar1 and Ar3 monitors

July 12-13, 2025

These tests are being carried out in the framework of the first Heterodyne pool week of Summer 25. Thanks to all involved for their comprehension.

Albrecht (AoD) and Angel at the telescope. Operators on Duty: Gloria (night) and Kike. Cryostat ok (T_MC = 0.170 K, T_Still = 1.21 K, T_4K = 8.37 K).

DAQ started with the window closed for sampling some instrumental noise traces. Bad KIDs (Ar1/Ar2/Ar3): 12, 5, 14. Screenshots of noise traces, in that order:

Ar1 Ar2 Ar3

23:45 (LT): Starting NIKA2 session. Window open, clear sky, tau_225GHz ~ 0.23, mild wind. DAQ restarted (total power), bad KIDs: (Ar1/Ar2/Ar3): 13/953, 5/578, 29/1000.

  • The first task is to get reliable focus corrections per array. Pointing on 1741-038 (1.61 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 10/7/2025: SMA). An issue arises: adopting MOPSIC_DAFS=/local/users/flexible/reduce/dafs_bck/dafs_local_tmp_run73_ar2 for PIIC-QL as established above, a message synchro problem or corrupted file appears. Everything goes fine with that in the case of Ar1/Ar3. 2mm-PIIC monitors restarted using MOPSIC_DAFS=/sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs: now it works. We continue on this. On the other hand, it was not possible to activate the creation of imbfits files with the old system. Albrecht is investigating possible issues with the NCS libraries.

  • Very stable atmosphere: p2p vars. in the second focus sequence of the session are ~ 2, 3, and 5 Jy/beam (ar1, ar2, ar3). Quiet residual background in the QL maps.

00:50 (LT): Changed to 1749+096 (2.33 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 09/7/2025: SMA) for new focus corrections.

12/7/2025 (UT) focus sequences (total power)

Scans

Target

Start El. [deg]

Ar2

Ar1

Ar3

Notes

268 - 271

1741-038

48.8

1.29

*

*

Bad range for Ar1/Ar3 focus corrections

274 - 277

1741-038

49.1

1.16

1.62

1.94*

Much better. Pivot should be Ar2 focus correction + 0.6 mm to have reasonable fits for all arrays per single focus sequence; not so good correction for Ar3

280 - 283

1741-038

49.1

1.15

1.54

1.76

Even better

286 - 289

1749+096

62.4

1.0

1.61

1.78

Good focus in general; maybe the telescope needs to relax a little more.

300 - 002

1749+096

57.6

1.05

1.47

1.75

01:15 (LT): Starting a first trial of flux calibrations on secondary standards:

calib_1scan maps - Total power - 12/7/2025

Scan

Target

Elevation

Notes

292

MWC349

66.3

focus opt. ar2

293

MWC349

67.3

focus opt. ar1/3

294

NGC7027

61.9

focus opt. ar1/3

295

NGC7027

62.9

focus opt. ar2

296

CRL2688

64.3

focus opt. ar2

297

CRL2688

65.3

focus opt. ar1/3

02:13 (LT): Starting a second trial of flux calibrations on secondary standards after a new focus correction on 1749+096:

calib_1scan maps - Total power - 13/7/2025

Scan

Target

Elevation

Notes

5

MWC349

77.7

focus opt. ar2

6

MWC349

78.6

focus opt. ar1/3

7

NGC7027

72.9

focus opt. ar1/3

8

NGC7027

73.9

focus opt. ar2

9

CRL2688

76.2

focus opt. ar2

10

CRL2688

76.3

focus opt. ar1/3

Calib_1scan maps with no apparent problems. Comparable to those obtained last April, for instance.

AB: completion of the last part in progress

13/7/2025 (UT) focus sequences (total power)

Scans

Target

Start El. [deg]

Ar2

Ar1

Ar3

Notes

13 - 17

2251+158 (3C454)

47.6

0.87

*

1.64

No fitting for ar1; repeating after change pivot for a best fitting in all arrays

18 - 22

2251+158 (3C454)

49.8

0.97

*

*

No fitting for ar1, bad fit for ar3

27 - 31

2251+158 (3C454)

55.41

1.17

*

*

No fitting for ar1, bad fit for ar3

33 - 37

2230+114

57.7

1.15

*

*

No fitting for ar1, bad fit for ar3

39 - 42

2230+114

59.4

1.17

1.60

1.83

Finally, a reasonable focus correction

50 - 54

Neptune

47.8

1.24

*

*

No fit for ar1, bad fit for ar3

60 - 64

2134+004

46.6

1.45

*

*

Marginal fit for ar1/3; changing to the appropriate pivot. Repeating.

65 - 69

2134+004

44.9

1.55

2.0

*

Marginal fit for ar3. Unreliable fits.

72 - 76

2134+004

59.4

1.55

2.0

*

Marginal fit for ar3. Unreliable fits.

DailyReportsNika2Run74 (last edited 2025-07-19 08:51:29 by NikaBolometer)