Differences between revisions 24 and 25
Revision 24 as of 2025-07-14 11:53:35
Size: 7932
Comment:
Revision 25 as of 2025-07-14 13:33:16
Size: 7928
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 43: Line 43:
 * Very stable atmosphere: p2p vars. in the second focus sequence of the session are ~ 2, 3, and 5 Jy/beam (ar1, ar2, ar3). Relatively quiet residual background in the QL maps, compared to run #73 in general.  * Very stable atmosphere: p2p vars. in the second focus sequence of the session are ~ 2, 3, and 5 Jy/beam (Ar1, 2, 3). Relatively quiet residual background in the QL maps, compared to run #73 in general.
Line 100: Line 100:
There was only time to obtain three beam maps in total power, finally on 2230+114, with focus optimised to ar2 (scan 20250713s45) and to ar1/3 (scans 20250713s47 and s78). For the last one, we adopted the correction of Ar1. This mini-shift finished at 07:30 (LT) with a skydip (scan s79). There was only time to obtain three beam maps in total power, finally on 2230+114, with focus optimised to Ar2 (scan 20250713s45) and to Ar1/3 (scans 20250713s47 and s78). For the last one, we adopted the correction of Ar1. This mini-shift finished at 07:30 (LT) with a skydip (scan s79).

Back to the NIKA2 Run 74 main page

NIKA2 Re-Commissioning (3rd. attempt)

NIKA2 run 74, Cryo run 86

Infos about the PIIC DAFs for the PIIC monitor

According to the results obtained from processing data of June 2025 NIKA2 re-commissioning given here, DAFs RPP scheme used during run 73 is kept. Therefore, two different sets of DAFs for Ar1+3 and for Ar2 are used. In practice:

  • Ar2
    • open a terminal, go to the QL directory
    • gagpiic
    • export MOPSIC_DAFS=/local/users/flexible/reduce/dafs_bck/dafs_local_tmp_run73_ar2
    • start the Ar2 monitor (pf)
    • repeat in another terminal for the Ar2 monitor(m)
  • Ar1 and Ar3
    • open a new terminal, go to the QL directory
    • gagpiic
    • echo $MOPSIC_DAFS -> check that it says /sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs

    • if not, then set it to that directory
    • proceed normally with the Ar1 and Ar3 monitors

July 12-13, 2025

These tests are being carried out in the framework of the first Heterodyne pool week of Summer 25. Thanks to all involved for their understanding.

Albrecht (AoD) and Angel at the telescope. Operators on Duty: Gloria (night) and Kike. Cryostat: T_MC = 0.170 K, T_Still = 1.21 K, T_4K = 8.37 K.

DAQ started with the window closed for sampling some instrumental noise traces. Bad KIDs (Ar1/Ar2/Ar3): 12, 5, 14. Screenshots of noise traces, in that order:

Ar1 Ar2 Ar3

23:45 (LT): Starting NIKA2 session. Window open, clear sky, tau_225GHz ~ 0.23, mild wind. DAQ restarted (total power), bad KIDs: (Ar1/Ar2/Ar3): 13/953, 5/578, 29/1000.

  • The first task is to obtain reliable focus corrections per array. Pointing on 1741-038 (1.64 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 10/7/2025: SMA). An issue arises: adopting MOPSIC_DAFS=/local/users/flexible/reduce/dafs_bck/dafs_local_tmp_run73_ar2 for PIIC-QL as established above, the message synchro problem or corrupted file appears. Everything goes fine with that in the case of Ar1/Ar3. 2mm-PIIC monitors restarted using MOPSIC_DAFS=/sw/gildas/mopsic/dafs: now it works. We continue on this. On the other hand, it was not possible to activate the creation of imbfits files with the old system. Albrecht is investigating possible issues, presumably related to the NCS libraries.

  • Very stable atmosphere: p2p vars. in the second focus sequence of the session are ~ 2, 3, and 5 Jy/beam (Ar1, 2, 3). Relatively quiet residual background in the QL maps, compared to run #73 in general.

00:50 (LT): Changed to 1749+096 (2.33 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 09/7/2025: SMA) for new focus corrections.

12/7/2025 (UT) focus sequences (total power)

Scans

Target

Start El. [deg]

Ar2

Ar1

Ar3

Notes

268 - 271

1741-038

48.8

1.29

*

*

Bad range for Ar1/Ar3 focus corrections

274 - 277

1741-038

49.1

1.16

1.62

1.94*

Much better. Guess focus should be around Ar2 focus correction + 0.6 mm to have reasonable fits with PIIC-QL for all arrays per single focus sequence; not so good correction for Ar3

280 - 283

1741-038

49.1

1.15

1.54

1.76

Even better

286 - 289

1749+096

62.4

1.0

1.61

1.78

Good focus in general; maybe the telescope needs to relax a little more.

300 - 002

1749+096

57.6

1.05

1.47

1.75

01:15 (LT): Starting a first trial of flux calibrations on secondary standards:

calib_1scan maps - Total power - 12/7/2025

Scan

Target

Elevation

Notes

292

MWC349

66.3

focus opt. ar2

293

MWC349

67.3

focus opt. ar1/3

294

NGC7027

61.9

focus opt. ar1/3

295

NGC7027

62.9

focus opt. ar2

296

CRL2688

64.3

focus opt. ar2

297

CRL2688

65.3

focus opt. ar1/3

02:13 (LT): Starting a second trial of flux calibrations on secondary standards after a new focus correction on 1749+096:

calib_1scan maps - Total power - 13/7/2025

Scan

Target

Elevation

Notes

5

MWC349

77.7

focus opt. ar2

6

MWC349

78.6

focus opt. ar1/3

7

NGC7027

72.9

focus opt. ar1/3

8

NGC7027

73.9

focus opt. ar2

9

CRL2688

76.2

focus opt. ar2

10

CRL2688

76.3

focus opt. ar1/3

Calib_1scan maps with no apparent problems. Comparable to those obtained last April, for instance.

02:50 (LT): Trying pointing & focus on 2251+158 (3C454; 6.05 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 10/7/2025: SMA).

Although the angular position offsets between arrays are similar to those of run #73, under qualitatively better atmospheric conditions it was not possible to obtain the best focus values for this source on arrays 1 and 3 this time. KIDs rejection on arrays 1 and 3 for the 2251+158 case was significant, which prevented the fitting. As an example, the screenshots below show a scan of a focus sequence obtained during run #73 and one from the current run. This effect is more dramatic in the case of Neptune (3.57 Jy @ 230 GHz, 11.7" beam: GILDAS/ASTRO). Perhaps I should have played around with the aiming offsets:

3C454_run73 3C454_run74

After a few attempts, we switched to a fainter source (2230+114; 3.91 Jy @ 1 mm, 30 days average until 10/7/2025: SMA) and were able to update the focus values. The table below summarises the last focus tries of the session:

13/7/2025 (UT) focus sequences (total power)

Scans

Target

Start El. [deg]

Ar2

Ar1

Ar3

Notes

13 - 17

2251+158 (3C454)

47.6

0.87

*

1.64

No fit for ar1; repeating after changing guess focus for a good fit in all arrays simultaneously.

18 - 22

2251+158 (3C454)

49.8

0.97

*

*

No fit for ar1, bad fit for ar3

27 - 31

2251+158 (3C454)

55.41

1.17

*

*

No fit for ar1, bad fit for ar3

33 - 37

2230+114

57.7

1.15

*

*

No fit for ar1, bad fit for ar3

39 - 42

2230+114

59.4

1.17

1.60

1.83

Finally, a reasonable focus correction

50 - 54

Neptune

47.8

1.24

*

*

No fit for ar1, bad fit for ar3

60 - 64

2134+004

46.6

1.45

*

*

Marginal fit for ar1/3; changing to a more appropriate guess focus. Repeating it.

65 - 69

2134+004

44.9

1.55

2.0

*

Marginal fit for ar3. Unreliable fits.

72 - 76

2134+004

59.4

1.55

2.0

*

Marginal fit for ar3. Unreliable fits.

There was only time to obtain three beam maps in total power, finally on 2230+114, with focus optimised to Ar2 (scan 20250713s45) and to Ar1/3 (scans 20250713s47 and s78). For the last one, we adopted the correction of Ar1. This mini-shift finished at 07:30 (LT) with a skydip (scan s79).

DailyReportsNika2Run74 (last edited 2025-07-14 13:33:16 by NikaBolometer)