|
Size: 1015
Comment:
|
Size: 1030
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 15: | Line 15: |
| Starting calibrations in total power using Uranus. Mean pointing offsets: 3, -7 arcsec. After focus (best value -0.15), the best beam sizes obtained are around 13 arcsecs in 1mm and 17.9 arcsecs in 2mm. After that, we tried a beam map on Uranus. Opacity was about 0.3 and the humidity level very high (99%). The weather conditions are not so good, probed by the peak-to-peak variations of the baselines (+/- 5 Jy). We proceed with a calib_1scan on Uranus. Then we go to NGC7027 and do a pointing | Starting calibrations in total power using Uranus. Mean pointing offsets: 3, -7 arcsec. After focus (best value -0.15), the best beam sizes obtained are around 13 arcsecs in 1mm and 17.9 arcsecs in 2mm. After that, we tried a beam map on Uranus. Opacity was about 0.3 and the humidity level very high (99%). The weather conditions are not so good, probed by the peak-to-peak variations of the baselines (up to +/- 5 Jy). We proceed with a calib_1scan on Uranus. Then we go to NGC7027 and do pointing and focus. |
Back to the NIKA2 Run 54 main page
Daily Reports
Contents
Remote observations.
Shifts after Sep. 20th to be defined (all times local time ie UTC+1h):
September 20th, Monday
Nico, Xavier, Martino, Ioannis:
Ioannis, Angel:
Starting calibrations in total power using Uranus. Mean pointing offsets: 3, -7 arcsec. After focus (best value -0.15), the best beam sizes obtained are around 13 arcsecs in 1mm and 17.9 arcsecs in 2mm. After that, we tried a beam map on Uranus. Opacity was about 0.3 and the humidity level very high (99%). The weather conditions are not so good, probed by the peak-to-peak variations of the baselines (up to +/- 5 Jy). We proceed with a calib_1scan on Uranus. Then we go to NGC7027 and do pointing and focus.
September 21th, Tuesday
TBD:
September 22th, Wednesday
TBD:
September 23th, Thursday
TBD:
September 24th, Friday