|
Size: 111
Comment:
|
Size: 6492
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| == March 2016, 04 (Friday) == We observed some secondary calibrators this night. Here are the maps of K3-50A and MWC349 we computed using a first analysis with nk_rta. {{attachment:K3-50A.png||height=300}} {{attachment:MWC349.png||height=300}} We also had the oportunity to observe RXJ1347 for '''1h13min''' before the secondary calibrators became available. The following figure is the S/N map we get from the coaddition of the scans at 2 mm we reduced using a common_mode_kids_out decorrelation method (the dual_band_dec method leaves to much noise on the map so the S/N is reduced). The color bar is not diplayed because the noise properties have not been estimated yet. Therefore the S/N values are wrong. The SZ pic position is consistent with the one measured with the NIKA prototype observations. Such a result is promising given the rather small integration time for an SZ observation ! {{attachment:RXJ1347.png||height=400}} We analyzed the beammaps made on Uranus yesterday morning at two different scan velocities (60 and 70"/sec). The beammaps were made at elevations higher than 30 degrees whereas this previous test realized on Mars on wednesday included a beammap measured at a mean elevation of 15 degree... The first three figures in the following show the results we get from the beammap scan made at 60"/sec (20160303s89_90_91) and the other three show the results we get from the beammap scan made at 70"/sec (20160303s86_87_88). It seems therefore than the scan velocity does not have a significant effect on the beam recovered shape and position in the focal plane. This conclusion has to be strengthened with more statistics so we will repeat this kind of observation tonight. {{attachment:A1_Uranus_60.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A2_Uranus_60.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A3_Uranus_60.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A1_Uranus_70.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A2_Uranus_70.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A3_Uranus_70.png||height=400}} == March 2016, 03 (Thursday) == ''' OBSERVATIONS SECOND DAY ''' * Opacities around 0.35 (@1mm) and 0.2 (@2mm) during the night then increases up to 0.45 at 1mm. Atmosphere pretty stable in the night, much less stable during the day. * Main observations today: about 4 hours integration on a deep field. 2 Beam maps on Uranus (2 with different telescope speeds - 60arcsec/s and 70arcsec/s). Focus session (mapping the focal plane with small maps on Uranus in order to detect deformations from flatness) - 20 points performed (with some redundancy on the center of the arrays). During the observation of the last 3 of these points a synchronisation problem in the acquisition occurred. * We got a good skydip 20160303s36 to compute C0 and C1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We analyzed the first beammap we made yesterday on Mars (scan velocity of 60arcsec/s). As shown on the following figures, two feedlines on array 1 and 3 were very noisy so the recovered sensitivities are quite bad for these KIDs. We get 1014/1140 = 89% valid detectors on array 1, 847/1020 = 83% on array 2 and 918/1140 = 81% on array 3. {{attachment:A1_sensitivity_Mars.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A2_sensitivity_Mars.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A3_sensitivity_Mars.png||height=400}} We also analyzed the last beammap made on Uranus. As shown on the following figures there were no more noisy feedline but one electronic box on array 1 was not working during the acquisition. We therefore lost all the corresponding KIDs. We get 875/1140 = 77% valid detectors on array 1, 844/1020 = 83% on array 2 and 906/1140 = 79% on array 3. {{attachment:A1_sensitivity_Uranus.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A2_sensitivity_Uranus.png||height=400}} {{attachment:A3_sensitivity_Uranus.png||height=400}} == March 2016, 02 (Wednesday) == ''' OBSERVATIONS FIRST DAY ''' * Opacities around 0.3 (@1mm) and 0.2 (@2mm) during the whole night/day. Atmosphere quite stable as well. Beautiful view! * Main observations today: about 2h30 integration on faint source (NEP-L about 35mJy@1mm). Beam maps on Mars (2 with different telescope speeds - 60arcsec/s and 70arcsec/s) and 1 on Uranus (with nominal telescope speed 60arcsec/s) * We got a good skydip 20160302s49 to compute C0 and C1. * Before each map we performed several pointing-focus-pointing sessions (good boys!) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * 02:00UT We go to the sky for the first time. Clear sky, opacity about 0.2 pretty stable. The sky noise seems good on the 3 arrays (see the plots below). A little worse on array 3 (1mm NIKEL DC). {{attachment:run4_noisesky_array2.png||height=500}} {{attachment:run4_noisesky_array1.png||height=500}} {{attachment:run4_noisesky_array3.png||height=500}} '''Figure.''' Noise on the sky for the 2mm, 1mm (array 1) and 1mm (array 3). * The noise is 1.5Hz/sqrt(Hz), 2Hz/sqrt(Hz), and 3Hz/sqrt(Hz) for the 2mm, 1mm (array 1) and 1mm (array 3) respectively. |
|
| Line 6: | Line 76: |
* Andrea arrived at the telescope. * '''Status of the Instrument:''' - The cryostat is at the nominam temperature T_100mK=150mK - All the 20 feedlines are connected. - The acquisition works nominally (few problems in the morning concerning the ports closed in nika2) - We are producing normal,compressed and mini file on nika2 and mac12 during the night to check if they are right. First check is ok. We will keep checking tomorrow morning. - We checked the modulation of the HWP and all the polarisation facilities of nika2. It seems to work nominally. Hereafter some plot to check the good health of NIKA2: {{attachment:run4_res_Array3.png||height=515}} {{attachment:run4_histo.png||height=515}} '''Figure.''' Left: trace of the 1140 pixels of array 3; right: monitor with all the 20 boards tuned. '''THE NOISE is taken with the window on the cryostat. It is in agreement with the previous observing campaign. No traces of the pulse tube. ''' {{attachment:run4_noise_array2.png||height=600}} {{attachment:run4_noise_array1.png||height=600}} {{attachment:run4_noise_array3.png||height=600}} '''Figure.''' Noise with the window on respectively the 2mm, 1mm NIKEL_RF (array 1) and 1mm NIKEL_DC (array 3) |
Back to the NIKA2 run 4 main page
Contents
March 2016, 04 (Friday)
We observed some secondary calibrators this night. Here are the maps of K3-50A and MWC349 we computed using a first analysis with nk_rta.
We also had the oportunity to observe RXJ1347 for 1h13min before the secondary calibrators became available. The following figure is the S/N map we get from the coaddition of the scans at 2 mm we reduced using a common_mode_kids_out decorrelation method (the dual_band_dec method leaves to much noise on the map so the S/N is reduced). The color bar is not diplayed because the noise properties have not been estimated yet. Therefore the S/N values are wrong. The SZ pic position is consistent with the one measured with the NIKA prototype observations. Such a result is promising given the rather small integration time for an SZ observation !
We analyzed the beammaps made on Uranus yesterday morning at two different scan velocities (60 and 70"/sec). The beammaps were made at elevations higher than 30 degrees whereas this previous test realized on Mars on wednesday included a beammap measured at a mean elevation of 15 degree... The first three figures in the following show the results we get from the beammap scan made at 60"/sec (20160303s89_90_91) and the other three show the results we get from the beammap scan made at 70"/sec (20160303s86_87_88). It seems therefore than the scan velocity does not have a significant effect on the beam recovered shape and position in the focal plane. This conclusion has to be strengthened with more statistics so we will repeat this kind of observation tonight.
March 2016, 03 (Thursday)
OBSERVATIONS SECOND DAY
- Opacities around 0.35 (@1mm) and 0.2 (@2mm) during the night then increases up to 0.45 at 1mm. Atmosphere pretty stable in the night, much less stable during the day.
- Main observations today: about 4 hours integration on a deep field. 2 Beam maps on Uranus (2 with different telescope speeds - 60arcsec/s and 70arcsec/s). Focus session (mapping the focal plane with small maps on Uranus in order to detect deformations from flatness) - 20 points performed (with some redundancy on the center of the arrays). During the observation of the last 3 of these points a synchronisation problem in the acquisition occurred.
- We got a good skydip 20160303s36 to compute C0 and C1.
We analyzed the first beammap we made yesterday on Mars (scan velocity of 60arcsec/s). As shown on the following figures, two feedlines on array 1 and 3 were very noisy so the recovered sensitivities are quite bad for these KIDs. We get 1014/1140 = 89% valid detectors on array 1, 847/1020 = 83% on array 2 and 918/1140 = 81% on array 3.
We also analyzed the last beammap made on Uranus. As shown on the following figures there were no more noisy feedline but one electronic box on array 1 was not working during the acquisition. We therefore lost all the corresponding KIDs. We get 875/1140 = 77% valid detectors on array 1, 844/1020 = 83% on array 2 and 906/1140 = 79% on array 3.
March 2016, 02 (Wednesday)
OBSERVATIONS FIRST DAY
- Opacities around 0.3 (@1mm) and 0.2 (@2mm) during the whole night/day. Atmosphere quite stable as well. Beautiful view!
- Main observations today: about 2h30 integration on faint source (NEP-L about 35mJy@1mm). Beam maps on Mars (2 with different telescope speeds - 60arcsec/s and 70arcsec/s) and 1 on Uranus (with nominal telescope speed 60arcsec/s)
- We got a good skydip 20160302s49 to compute C0 and C1.
- Before each map we performed several pointing-focus-pointing sessions (good boys!)
* 02:00UT We go to the sky for the first time. Clear sky, opacity about 0.2 pretty stable.
The sky noise seems good on the 3 arrays (see the plots below). A little worse on array 3 (1mm NIKEL DC).
Figure. Noise on the sky for the 2mm, 1mm (array 1) and 1mm (array 3).
* The noise is 1.5Hz/sqrt(Hz), 2Hz/sqrt(Hz), and 3Hz/sqrt(Hz) for the 2mm, 1mm (array 1) and 1mm (array 3) respectively.
February 2016, 29 (Monday)
* Andrea arrived at the telescope.
* Status of the Instrument:
- The cryostat is at the nominam temperature T_100mK=150mK
- All the 20 feedlines are connected.
- The acquisition works nominally (few problems in the morning concerning the ports closed in nika2)
- We are producing normal,compressed and mini file on nika2 and mac12 during the night to check if they are right. First check is ok. We will keep checking tomorrow morning.
- We checked the modulation of the HWP and all the polarisation facilities of nika2. It seems to work nominally.
Hereafter some plot to check the good health of NIKA2:
Figure. Left: trace of the 1140 pixels of array 3; right: monitor with all the 20 boards tuned.
THE NOISE is taken with the window on the cryostat. It is in agreement with the previous observing campaign. No traces of the pulse tube.
Figure. Noise with the window on respectively the 2mm, 1mm NIKEL_RF (array 1) and 1mm NIKEL_DC (array 3)