Differences between revisions 1 and 6 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2018-01-11 09:53:07
Size: 5366
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2018-01-11 10:31:16
Size: 2980
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[http://www.iram.es/IRAMES/mainWiki/Continuum/NIKA2/Main#s17_pool:_24-31_October_2017|Back to the NIKA2 1st Science pool]] [[http://www.iram.es/IRAMES/mainWiki/Continuum/NIKA2/Main#w17_.28Jan.2C_Feb.2C_Mar_2018.29 |Back to the NIKA2 2nd Science pool]]
Line 3: Line 3:
New frequency sweep done at beginning of the run on A2 => new KID numbering, the ref pix is now 824 (it's the same as in previous run, but its number was 823). No new freq sweep on A1 & A3; but several KIDs that were not usable previously are now usable (thanks to relatively low stable tau). [Add here a short summary of any unusual features or novelties on the instrument and KIDs parameter side ]
Line 7: Line 8:

<<TableOfContents(3)>>

----
Line 9: Line 15:
'''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)'''

|| Dates || UT || scan # || elevation || comment ||
|| 25-10-2017 || 4:00 || 50 || 58d || otf 8x4 ||
|| 25-10-2017 || 5:36 || 70 || 40d || otf ?? ||
|| 26-10-2017 || 19:56 || 254 || 31d || otf 8x5 ||
|| 26-10-2017 || 22:51 || 316 || 63d || otf 8x5 ||



'''Thursday 27th october 2017'''

Beammap on Uranus s49 elev=40deg tau=0.25 stable

Gain curve task : 3C84 (0316+413) see table above.


'''Tuesday/wednesday 25/26th october 2017'''

40 position sources across the sky observed. Current model is found reasonable but Albrecht improves on it and implements modifications of P7, P10 and P11.
 
Gain curve task : 3C84 (0316+413) see table above.

 
Line 36: Line 18:
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171020.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/20]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171021.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/21]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171022.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/22]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171023.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/23]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171024.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/24]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171025.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/25]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171026.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/26]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171027.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/27]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171028.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/28]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171029.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/29]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171030.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/30]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20171031.html|Pipeline logbook 2017/10/31]] || ||
|| [[https://www.iram.es/mrt-lx1/mrt/ncs/monitor/Nika2Logbook/logbook_20180116.html|Pipeline logbook 2018/01/16]] || ||
Line 50: Line 21:
----
Line 51: Line 23:
=== Beammap analysis status === == Calibration observation logbook ==

=== Pointing checks ===

The pointing model is to be checked on the first night of the campaign by means of a mini pointing session (about 10 sources), and if needed a complete session (minimum 15 sources, 30 is better).
[Add here a summary of the pointing session(s)]
  

=== Beammaps ===

Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm). If the weather conditions are good enough, lateral focus corrections can be implemented as well, using the maps of the residual after subtraction of a Gaussian beam.


''Beammap analysis status''
Line 61: Line 46:
|| 20171029s266 || LP || Uranus, obs. date about midnight, elev below 60 deg, v0 done || done ||
|| 20171028s310 || LP || Uranus, obs. date about 11:30 p. m., elev about 60 degrees. Analysis: fwhm ok, mickey's ears visible || done ||
|| 20171028s58 || LP || Uranus, obs. date about 3 a. m., elev. starting at 33 deg (setting), focus stable, analysis v0: some instabilities on A1, beams larger and more elliptical wrt the ref. kidpar. Large beam confirmed for v2 || done ||
|| 20171027s49 || LP || Uranus, obs. date = 3 a.m., elev about 30 deg, focus stable, v0: sizeable amount of 'double' found || done ||
|| 20171025s42 || FR, LP || Uranus, obs. date about 3 a.m., elev. from 32 deg., focus=best central - 0.2mm, v2 using CM_ONE_BLOCK || v0: FR, v2: LP ||
|| 20171025s41 || FR, LP || Uranus, obs. date about 2:30 a.m., elev. from 37 deg., focus=best central - 0.3mm, v2 using CM_ONE_BLOCK || v0: FR, v2: LP ||
|| 20171024s106 || ||Mars, focus=best central - 0.2mm, observed during the sunrise, large focus drift || ||
|| 20171024s105 || LP ||Mars, focus=best central - 0.3mm, beams a bit large at 1mm (>12arcsec) || done ||
|| 20171023s101 || LP || Mars, fair noise decorrelation at the first iteration, v2 also done || done ||
|| 20171022s158 || LP || Mars, should be the best ever ! :), fair noise decorrelation at the first iteration, hint of a focus drift (due to sunrise) || done ||
|| 20171021s218 || || Mars, || ||
|| 20171021s167 || || Mars, || ||
|| 20171020s93 || NP || Mars, should be well focused, used for kidpar_N2R12_v0.fits || done ||


'' Special beammap sequences ''

 * For the optimization of the best average focus, a few series of beammaps at different axial focus in a row are needed: the focus settings to be spanned are z0 - 0.2mm, z0 - 0.3mm and z0 - 0.4mm.
 * For the study of the elevation impact and the test of destriping methods, couples of beammap with orthogonal scanning startegy will be made (using @beammap99.. a (default) and e (along the elevation)).
 

=== Opacity ===

A skydip scan per 8-hour observation shift, in all possible weather conditions, is needed

''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)''

|| Dates || scan # || tau225 || comment ||
|| 20180112 || || || ||


=== Gain-elevation monitoring ===

''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)''

|| Dates || scan # || UT || elevation || comment ||
|| 20180116 || || || || otf 8x4 ||

Back to the NIKA2 2nd Science pool

[Add here a short summary of any unusual features or novelties on the instrument and KIDs parameter side ]

Pointing array: A2 (pix 824). Focus array: A1.


Day to day observation logbook

Use TAPAS login with the project account nikas-17 by default.

Link to daily pipeline logbook

Link to manual logbook

Pipeline logbook 2018/01/16


Calibration observation logbook

Pointing checks

The pointing model is to be checked on the first night of the campaign by means of a mini pointing session (about 10 sources), and if needed a complete session (minimum 15 sources, 30 is better). [Add here a summary of the pointing session(s)]

Beammaps

Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm). If the weather conditions are good enough, lateral focus corrections can be implemented as well, using the maps of the residual after subtraction of a Gaussian beam.

Beammap analysis status

The table below gathers the beammap scan ID, comments related either to the observing condition or to the reduced beammap quality and the analysis status

Status "done" means the analysis is completed, namely the kidpar file is produced using a 2-step iteration analysis, and uploaded in SVN.

Scan ID

analyser initials

comments

status

20171030s268

LP

Uranus, obs. date is 11:15 p. m., elev about 60 deg, finished 30 min. before a crash of the main pump, A1 has 12.5 arcsec average fwhm

done

Special beammap sequences

  • For the optimization of the best average focus, a few series of beammaps at different axial focus in a row are needed: the focus settings to be spanned are z0 - 0.2mm, z0 - 0.3mm and z0 - 0.4mm.
  • For the study of the elevation impact and the test of destriping methods, couples of beammap with orthogonal scanning startegy will be made (using @beammap99.. a (default) and e (along the elevation)).

Opacity

A skydip scan per 8-hour observation shift, in all possible weather conditions, is needed

Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)

Dates

scan #

tau225

comment

20180112

Gain-elevation monitoring

Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)

Dates

scan #

UT

elevation

comment

20180116

otf 8x4

D2DLogNika2Run14 (last edited 2018-01-20 15:57:46 by ladjelate)