Differences between revisions 7 and 21 (spanning 14 versions)
Revision 7 as of 2018-01-11 10:55:09
Size: 3893
Comment:
Revision 21 as of 2018-01-16 21:07:13
Size: 3571
Editor: ritaccoa
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
== Calibration observation plan ==

Draft discussed in ’Tiger Team’ meeting with Hervé, Nico, Juan, Martino, Jean-François, Samuel & Laurence

 1. Alignment checks
    * to do if the first pointing sequence (pointing, focus, pointing) is off-source
    * check the alignment using the laser on Monday before the campaign
    * if beammaps are not good despite a good weather, a better matching of the optical and radial axis can be tempted (using the ecosorb)
 1. Mini pointing session
    * to be done the first night of the campaign
 1. Beammap at optimal axial and lateral focus
    * perform a beammap sequence, focus + pointing + beammap, at least once a day
    * span various elevation
    * if good weather try and use lateral focus corrections from the maps of the residual after subtraction of a Gaussian beam
    * do a few series of beammaps at different axial focus in a row: at z0 - 0.2mm, z0 - 0.3mm and z0 - 0.4mm
 1. Opacity
    * several skydips a day in all possible weather conditions, basically one per 8-hour shift
 1. Calibration
    * Monitor primary and secondary calibrators. Few of them but repeatedly along the run and at various elev.
    * Observe in priority MWC349: use the loop script comprizing 4 OTF scans, 3 times a day
    * Observe also Uranus, Mars & Neptune + NGC7027 (and optionally CRL2688)
 1. Gain elevation correction
    * at least two complete spans of the elevation from about 20 to 80 degrees using 3C84


This page gather the information on the technical observations that are needed to perform NIKA2 calibration.
Line 38: Line 13:
Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm). If the weather conditions are good enough, lateral focus corrections can be implemented as well, using the maps of the residual after subtraction of a Gaussian beam. Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm).
Line 49: Line 24:
|| '''Scan ID''' || '''analyser initials''' || '''comments''' || '''status''' ||
|| 20171030s268 || LP || Uranus, obs. date is 11:15 p. m., elev about 60 deg, finished 30 min. before a crash of the main pump, A1 has 12.5 arcsec average fwhm|| done ||
|| |||||||| ''' observing condition ''' |||||| '''analysis status''' ||
|| '''scan ID''' || ''source''|| ''UT'' || ''elevation'' || ''comments'' || ''analyser ID'' || ''data quality'' || ''status'' ||
|| 20180115s108 || Uranus || 2:10 p.m. || 35 deg || closest focus scan 15s106 || || || ||
|| 20180115s109 || Uranus || 2:35 p.m. || 39 deg || scan in elevation (constant azymuth) || || || ||
|| 20180115s122 || Uranus || 4:00 p.m. || 54 deg || closest focus scan 15s120 || || || ||
|| 20180115s123 || Uranus || 4:25 p.m. || 57 deg || z0 - 0.1 || || || ||
|| 20180115s124 || Uranus || 4:50 p.m. || 60 deg || z0 - 0.3 || || || ||
|| 20180115s125 || Uranus || 5:15 p.m. || 61 deg || z0 - 0.4 || || || ||
|| 20180116s68 || Uranus || 5:04 p.m. || 61 deg || z0 - 0.2 || || || ||
Line 63: Line 46:
''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)'' ''Table of the Skydip scans''
Line 66: Line 49:
|| 20180112 || || || || || 20180116 || 69 || 0.3 || ||


== Calibrators ==

 * Monitor primary and secondary calibrators. Few of them but repeatedly along the run and at various elevation
 * Observe in priority MWC349: use the loop script comprizing 4 OTF scans, 3 times a day
 * Observe also Uranus, Mars & Neptune + NGC7027 (and optionally CRL2688)
Below the visibility plot:

{{attachment:Visibility_calib.pdf | Science Visibility plot | width=850}}

''Table of secondary calibrator scans''

|| Dates || scan # || source || elevation || comment ||
|| 20180116 || 82-85 || MWC349 || 29-26 || otf 8x5 ||
|| 20180116 || 102-105 || Uranus || 45-44 || otf 8x5 ||
Line 71: Line 70:
''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)'' Observe at least two complete spans of the elevation from about 20 to 80 degrees using 3C84


''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikaw-17)''
Line 74: Line 76:
|| 20180116 ||         || || || otf 8x4 || || 20180116 || 111-114 || || || otf 8x5 ||

Back to the NIKA2 2nd Science pool

This page gather the information on the technical observations that are needed to perform NIKA2 calibration.

Pointing

The pointing model is to be checked on the first night of the campaign by means of a mini pointing session (about 10 sources), and if needed a complete session (minimum 15 sources, 30 is better). [Add here a summary of the pointing session(s)]

Beammaps

Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm).

Beammap analysis status

The table below gathers the beammap scan ID, comments related either to the observing condition or to the reduced beammap quality and the analysis status

Status "done" means the analysis is completed, namely the kidpar file is produced using a 2-step iteration analysis, and uploaded in SVN.

observing condition

analysis status

scan ID

source

UT

elevation

comments

analyser ID

data quality

status

20180115s108

Uranus

2:10 p.m.

35 deg

closest focus scan 15s106

20180115s109

Uranus

2:35 p.m.

39 deg

scan in elevation (constant azymuth)

20180115s122

Uranus

4:00 p.m.

54 deg

closest focus scan 15s120

20180115s123

Uranus

4:25 p.m.

57 deg

z0 - 0.1

20180115s124

Uranus

4:50 p.m.

60 deg

z0 - 0.3

20180115s125

Uranus

5:15 p.m.

61 deg

z0 - 0.4

20180116s68

Uranus

5:04 p.m.

61 deg

z0 - 0.2

Special beammap sequences

  • For the optimization of the best average focus, a few series of beammaps at different axial focus in a row are needed: the focus settings to be spanned are z0 - 0.2mm, z0 - 0.3mm and z0 - 0.4mm.
  • For the study of the elevation impact and the test of destriping methods, couples of beammap with orthogonal scanning startegy will be made (using @beammap99.. a (default) and e (along the elevation)).

Opacity

A skydip scan per 8-hour observation shift, in all possible weather conditions, is needed

Table of the Skydip scans

Dates

scan #

tau225

comment

20180116

69

0.3

Calibrators

  • Monitor primary and secondary calibrators. Few of them but repeatedly along the run and at various elevation
  • Observe in priority MWC349: use the loop script comprizing 4 OTF scans, 3 times a day
  • Observe also Uranus, Mars & Neptune + NGC7027 (and optionally CRL2688)

Below the visibility plot:

Science Visibility plot

Table of secondary calibrator scans

Dates

scan #

source

elevation

comment

20180116

82-85

MWC349

29-26

otf 8x5

20180116

102-105

Uranus

45-44

otf 8x5

Gain-elevation monitoring

Observe at least two complete spans of the elevation from about 20 to 80 degrees using 3C84

Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikaw-17)

Dates

scan #

UT

elevation

comment

20180116

111-114

otf 8x5

CalibNika2Run14 (last edited 2018-02-08 10:47:36 by NikaBolometer)