Size: 2839
Comment:
|
Size: 3966
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
Line 28: | Line 26: |
|| 20171030s268 || Uranus || 11:15 p.m. || 60 deg || finished 30 min. before a crash of the main pump || LP || A1 has 12.5 arcsec average fwhm || done || | || 20180115s108 || Uranus || 2:10 p.m. || 35 deg || closest focus scan 15s106 || || || || || 20180115s109 || Uranus || 2:35 p.m. || 39 deg || scan in elevation (constant azymuth) || || || || || 20180115s122 || Uranus || 4:00 p.m. || 54 deg || closest focus scan 15s120 || LP || v0 done || || || 20180115s123 || Uranus || 4:25 p.m. || 57 deg || z0 - 0.1 || || || || || 20180115s124 || Uranus || 4:50 p.m. || 60 deg || z0 - 0.3 || || || || || 20180115s125 || Uranus || 5:15 p.m. || 61 deg || z0 - 0.4 || || || || || 20180116s68 || Uranus || 5:04 p.m. || 61 deg || z0 - 0.2 || || || || |
Line 44: | Line 49: |
|| 20180112 || || || || | || 20180116 || 69 || 0.3 || || |
Line 52: | Line 57: |
Below the visibility plot: {{attachment:Visibility_calib.pdf | Science Visibility plot | width=850}} |
|
Line 56: | Line 64: |
|| 20180112 || || || || | || 20180116 || 82-85 || MWC349 || 29-26 || otf 8x5 || || 20180116 || 102-105 || Uranus || 45-44 || otf 8x5 || |
Line 61: | Line 70: |
''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)'' | Observe at least two complete spans of the elevation from about 20 to 80 degrees using 3C84 |
Line 63: | Line 72: |
|| Dates || scan # || UT || elevation || comment || || 20180116 || || || || otf 8x4 || |
''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikaw-17)'' || Dates || scan # || UT || elevation || comment || || 20180116 || 111-114 || 20:55-21:15 || 76-73 deg || otf 8x5 || || 20180116 || 163-167 || 23:30-23:40 || 48-46 deg || otf 8x5 || || 20180117 || 35-38 || 2:30-2:45 || 17-14 deg || otf 8x5, OUT OF FOCUS || || 20180117 || 39-42 || 2:45-3:00 || 14- deg || otf 8x5, focus set by hand without having used @focusOTF-Z, but we checked the focus was stable (no sizeable change) afterwards || |
Back to the NIKA2 2nd Science pool
This page gather the information on the technical observations that are needed to perform NIKA2 calibration.
Pointing
The pointing model is to be checked on the first night of the campaign by means of a mini pointing session (about 10 sources), and if needed a complete session (minimum 15 sources, 30 is better). [Add here a summary of the pointing session(s)]
Beammaps
Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm).
Beammap analysis status
The table below gathers the beammap scan ID, comments related either to the observing condition or to the reduced beammap quality and the analysis status
Status "done" means the analysis is completed, namely the kidpar file is produced using a 2-step iteration analysis, and uploaded in SVN.
|
observing condition |
analysis status |
|||||
scan ID |
source |
UT |
elevation |
comments |
analyser ID |
data quality |
status |
20180115s108 |
Uranus |
2:10 p.m. |
35 deg |
closest focus scan 15s106 |
|
|
|
20180115s109 |
Uranus |
2:35 p.m. |
39 deg |
scan in elevation (constant azymuth) |
|
|
|
20180115s122 |
Uranus |
4:00 p.m. |
54 deg |
closest focus scan 15s120 |
LP |
v0 done |
|
20180115s123 |
Uranus |
4:25 p.m. |
57 deg |
z0 - 0.1 |
|
|
|
20180115s124 |
Uranus |
4:50 p.m. |
60 deg |
z0 - 0.3 |
|
|
|
20180115s125 |
Uranus |
5:15 p.m. |
61 deg |
z0 - 0.4 |
|
|
|
20180116s68 |
Uranus |
5:04 p.m. |
61 deg |
z0 - 0.2 |
|
|
|
Special beammap sequences
- For the optimization of the best average focus, a few series of beammaps at different axial focus in a row are needed: the focus settings to be spanned are z0 - 0.2mm, z0 - 0.3mm and z0 - 0.4mm.
- For the study of the elevation impact and the test of destriping methods, couples of beammap with orthogonal scanning startegy will be made (using @beammap99.. a (default) and e (along the elevation)).
Opacity
A skydip scan per 8-hour observation shift, in all possible weather conditions, is needed
Table of the Skydip scans
Dates |
scan # |
tau225 |
comment |
20180116 |
69 |
0.3 |
|
Calibrators
- Monitor primary and secondary calibrators. Few of them but repeatedly along the run and at various elevation
- Observe in priority MWC349: use the loop script comprizing 4 OTF scans, 3 times a day
Observe also Uranus, Mars & Neptune + NGC7027 (and optionally CRL2688)
Below the visibility plot:
Table of secondary calibrator scans
Dates |
scan # |
source |
elevation |
comment |
20180116 |
82-85 |
MWC349 |
29-26 |
otf 8x5 |
20180116 |
102-105 |
Uranus |
45-44 |
otf 8x5 |
Gain-elevation monitoring
Observe at least two complete spans of the elevation from about 20 to 80 degrees using 3C84
Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikaw-17)
Dates |
scan # |
UT |
elevation |
comment |
20180116 |
111-114 |
20:55-21:15 |
76-73 deg |
otf 8x5 |
20180116 |
163-167 |
23:30-23:40 |
48-46 deg |
otf 8x5 |
20180117 |
35-38 |
2:30-2:45 |
17-14 deg |
otf 8x5, OUT OF FOCUS |
20180117 |
39-42 |
2:45-3:00 |
14- deg |
otf 8x5, focus set by hand without having used @focusOTF-Z, but we checked the focus was stable (no sizeable change) afterwards |