Differences between revisions 1 and 9 (spanning 8 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2018-01-11 10:46:42
Size: 2407
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2018-01-11 12:37:45
Size: 2769
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
This page gather the information on the technical observations that are needed to perform NIKA2 calibration.
Line 4: Line 5:
<<TableOfContents(3)>>
Line 15: Line 15:
Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm). If the weather conditions are good enough, lateral focus corrections can be implemented as well, using the maps of the residual after subtraction of a Gaussian beam. Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm).
Line 40: Line 40:
''Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)'' ''Table of the Skydip scans''
Line 44: Line 44:


== Calibrators ==

 * Monitor primary and secondary calibrators. Few of them but repeatedly along the run and at various elevation
 * Observe in priority MWC349: use the loop script comprizing 4 OTF scans, 3 times a day
 * Observe also Uranus, Mars & Neptune + NGC7027 (and optionally CRL2688)

''Table of secondary calibrator scans''

|| Dates || scan # || source || elevation || comment ||
|| 20180112 || || || ||

Back to the NIKA2 2nd Science pool

This page gather the information on the technical observations that are needed to perform NIKA2 calibration.

Pointing

The pointing model is to be checked on the first night of the campaign by means of a mini pointing session (about 10 sources), and if needed a complete session (minimum 15 sources, 30 is better). [Add here a summary of the pointing session(s)]

Beammaps

Beammap sequences, which are focus + pointing + beammap, are to be done at least once a day, spanning various elevation, at the best average focus (z central - 0.2 mm).

Beammap analysis status

The table below gathers the beammap scan ID, comments related either to the observing condition or to the reduced beammap quality and the analysis status

Status "done" means the analysis is completed, namely the kidpar file is produced using a 2-step iteration analysis, and uploaded in SVN.

Scan ID

analyser initials

comments

status

20171030s268

LP

Uranus, obs. date is 11:15 p. m., elev about 60 deg, finished 30 min. before a crash of the main pump, A1 has 12.5 arcsec average fwhm

done

Special beammap sequences

  • For the optimization of the best average focus, a few series of beammaps at different axial focus in a row are needed: the focus settings to be spanned are z0 - 0.2mm, z0 - 0.3mm and z0 - 0.4mm.
  • For the study of the elevation impact and the test of destriping methods, couples of beammap with orthogonal scanning startegy will be made (using @beammap99.. a (default) and e (along the elevation)).

Opacity

A skydip scan per 8-hour observation shift, in all possible weather conditions, is needed

Table of the Skydip scans

Dates

scan #

tau225

comment

20180112

Calibrators

  • Monitor primary and secondary calibrators. Few of them but repeatedly along the run and at various elevation
  • Observe in priority MWC349: use the loop script comprizing 4 OTF scans, 3 times a day
  • Observe also Uranus, Mars & Neptune + NGC7027 (and optionally CRL2688)

Table of secondary calibrator scans

Dates

scan #

source

elevation

comment

20180112

Gain-elevation monitoring

Table for gain curve task (3C84, i.e. 0316+413 in nikas-17)

Dates

scan #

UT

elevation

comment

20180116

otf 8x4

CalibNika2Run14 (last edited 2018-02-08 10:47:36 by NikaBolometer)